other proteins, DNA, and RNA. Hence, they represent
attractive targets for developing new methods for treating a
variety of diseases. Triaryl ring systems can mimic sections
of these helices by orientating peptide side-chains in either
the i, i+3, and i+7 or i, i+4, and i+7 positions. They have
the potential to be particularly useful in this regard because
they represent typical drug-like scaffolds. With this in mind,
we became interested in developing the synthetic methodol-
ogy needed to build microelectrode array-supported libraries
of triaryl peptidomimetics.
The study of site-selective Suzuki reactions began with
the placement of a 4-iodobenzoate substrate (1) onto the
surface of an array having 1024 microelectrodes cm-2
(Scheme 1). The substrate was placed proximal to each of
Scheme 1
The key to constructing triaryl ring skeletons is the Suzuki
reaction.8,10 The Suzuki reaction allows for a “building-
block” approach to the molecules using preconstructed,
individual aryl rings that are then coupled to each other. But
can such an approach be employed site-selectively on a
microelectrode array? Microelectrode array reactions involve
a delicate balance between the electrochemical generation
of a catalyst, the rate of the desired reaction, and the
destruction of the catalyst generated in the solution above
the array by a “confining” agent. In this balance, the
confining agent must be reactive enough to prevent migration
of the catalyst to nonselected sites in the array. This is a
challenging task since the arrays can contain up to 12 544
microelectrodes cm-2. On the other hand, the confining agent
must not be too reactive or it will prevent the desired reaction
from occurring at the selected electrodes. Hence, the critical
step in the development of any new reaction on a micro-
electrode array is identifying an effective confining agent.
For the Suzuki reaction, the need for a confining agent
immediately raised questions about the generality of the
strategy used to confine the earlier Pd(0)-catalyzed reactions.7
Does changing the reaction catalyzed by a reagent on a
microelectrode array require the identification of a new
confining agent, or can the parameters of the electrolysis be
adjusted to account for differences in the reactions so that
the same confining agents can be employed? The answer to
this question is essential for planning new reactions and
synthetic strategies on the arrays. We report here that site-
selective Suzuki reactions can be accomplished using the
confining strategy developed earlier for the Heck reaction if
the rate of Pd(0) generation at the microelectrodes is reduced
and the concentration of the confining agent increased to
account for a faster reaction.
the electrodes in the array using the electrogenerated base
catalyzed procedure previously developed for coupling
activated esters to the agarose polymer coating the array.6,7
The Suzuki reaction was then initiated using nearly the same
conditions utilized to accomplish site-selective Heck
reactions.7a Accordingly, the entire surface of the array was
treated with an acetonitrile/dimethylformamide/water solution
containing pyrene-1-boronic acid 2, palladium acetate, triph-
enylphosphine, and tetrabutylammonium bromide. The Pd(II)
reagent was then reduced to the required Pd(0)-catalyst at
selected locations on the array by using the microelectrodes
as cathodes. The potential at the selected electrodes was set
at -2.4 V relative to a remote Pt-wire anode for 0.5 s and
then the electrodes turned off for 0.1 s. Nonselected
electrodes were left off for the entire reaction. The only
change in the reaction relative to the site-selective Heck
reaction was the use of allyl acetate as the confining agent
instead of the allyl methyl carbonate employed previously.
The confining agent is added to the solution above the array
in order to oxidize any Pd(0) that begins to migrate away
from the microelectrodes selected as cathodes. This prevents
unwanted reactions from occurring proximal to electrodes
that were not selected. Both allyl acetate and allyl methyl
(6) For Pd(II) reactions, see: (a) Tesfu, E.; Maurer, K.; Ragsdale, S. R.;
Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6212–6213. (b) Tesfu, E.;
Maurer, K.; McShae, A.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 70.
For examples using electrogenerated base, see: Maurer, K.; McShea, A.;
Strathmann, M.; Dill, K. J. Comb. Chem. 2005, 7, 637. For the site-selective
generation of acid, see: Kesselring, D.; Maurer, K.; Moeller, K. D. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 2501. For the use site-selective use of ceric ammonium
nitrate, see: Kesselring, D.; Maurer, K.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 11290
.
(7) For a Pd(0) reactions see: (a) Tian, J.; Maurer, K.; Tesfu, E.; Moeller,
K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1392. (b) Tang, F.; Chen, C.; Moeller,
K. D. Synthesis 2007, 3411. (c) Chen, C.; Lu, P.; Walker, A.; Maurer, K.;
Moeller, K. D. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 973. (d) Tian, J.; Maurer,
Scheme 2
K.; Moeller, K. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 5664
.
(8) For the use of triaryl systems as helix mimics, see: Yin, H.; Lee,
G.; Seedy, K. A.; Kutzki, O.; Park, H. S.; Orner, B. P.; Ernst, J. T.; Wang,
H.-G.; Sebti, S. M.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10192
(9) For the phenyl dipyridyl systems, see: Che, Y.; Brooks, B. R.;
Marshall, G. R. Biopolymers 2007, 86 (4), 288
(10) For 2: Unpublished results with Bourne, G. and Marshall, G. R.
.
.
1274
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009