ChemComm
Table 1 Comparison of C-NMR data of authentic 5 to C-labelled 5
Communication
13
13
13
obtained after feeding of [2- C]-12 to F. fujikuroi
a
b
a
b
Carbon no.
d [ppm]
Carbon no.
d [ppm]
C-19
C-7
C-16
C-2
178.1
173.2
157.8
133.3
131.5
106.3
90.5
C-9
C-5
C-6
C-8
C-14
C-15
C-12
C-11
C-18
52.1
50.8
50.5
49.4
44.3
42.7
38.8
16.6
14.5
C-1
C-17
C-10
C-13
C-3
76.6
68.4
C-4
53.1
a
b 13
Carbon numbering according to Scheme 1.
C NMR shifts of 5 are
2
13
referenced to [ H
feeding experiment with [2- C]-12 are given in bold.
6
]DMSO. C-NMR signals of labelled carbons in the
13
13
Scheme 4 Detected C labelling patterns in sesquiterpenes from Fusarium
13
13
fujikuroi after feeding of [2- C]-12. Asterisks indicate C-labelled carbons.
Notes and references
1
N. L. Brock, B. Tudzynski and J. S. Dickschat, ChemBioChem, 2011,
2, 2667.
N. L. Brock, K. Huss, B. Tudzynski and J. S. Dickschat, ChemBioChem,
013, 14, 311.
1
2
2
3
4
D. E. Cane, R. Iyengar and M.-S. Shiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 914.
C. B ¨o mke and B. Tudzynski, Phytochemistry, 2009, 70, 1876.
1
3
2
13
5 F. McCapra, A. I. Scott, G. A. Sim and D. W. Young, Proc. Chem. Soc.,
Fig. 1 (A) C NMR spectrum of 5 in [ H
6
]DMSO; (B) C NMR spectrum of a
13
1962, 185.
crude culture extract from F. fujikuroi after feeding of [2- C]-12. Asterisks
indicate carbon signals originating from 5 after incorporation of [2- C]-12.
6
7
8
9
M. C. Rojas, P. Hedden, P. Gaskin and B. Tudzynski, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A., 2001, 98, 5838.
S. Malonek, M. C. Rojas, P. Hedden, P. Gaskin, P. Hopkins and
B. Tudzynski, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2005, 71, 1462.
B. Tudzynski, M. C. Rojas, P. Gaskin and P. Hedden, J. Biol. Chem.,
13
Fig. S8–S10 of ESI†). The signal at 27.6 ppm is due to incorporation into
the geminal pro-S methyl group of 14, whereas only low incorporation
ca. 10% by C NMR peak integration) into the adjacent methyl group
was detected (25.6 ppm). This defined stereochemical course is in
strong favour of a concerted S 2 type reaction with major inversion of
configuration, which in turn demonstrates incorporation of labelling
mainly into the pro-R methyl group of 1. This experiment also shows
that attack of the acorenyl cation E by water must have occurred from
the Re face of the molecule (Re/Si distinguished due to labelling,
2002, 277, 21246.
13
(
B. Tudzynski, M. Mihlan, M. C. Rojas, P. Linnemannst o¨ ns, P. Gaskin
and P. Hedden, J. Biol. Chem., 2003, 278, 28635.
23
1
0 A. Bhattacharya, S. Kourmpetli, D. A. Ward, S. G. Thomas, F. Gong,
S. J. Powers, E. Carrera, B. Taylor, F. N. de Caceres Gonzalez,
B. Tudzynski, A. L. Phillips, M. R. Davey and P. Hedden, Plant Physiol.,
2012, 160, 837.
N
1
1
1 S. J. Castellaro, S. C. Dolan, P. Hedden, P. Gaskin and J. Macmillan,
Phytochemistry, 1990, 29, 1833.
2 P. Hedden, Physiol. Plant., 1991, 101, 709.
Scheme 4). In contrast, an alternative stereochemical course with 13 A. J. Birch, R. W. Richards and H. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1959, 7, 241.
1
1
4 J. R. Hanson, J. Hawker and A. F. White, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1972, 1892.
5 J. A. Lawson, W. T. Colwell, J. I. De Graw, R. H. Peters, R. L. Dehn
and M. Tanabe, Synthesis, 1975, 729.
elimination of water from 1 to generate a cation that is intramolecularly
reattacked by the olefinic double bond from the same side, i.e. with
retention of configuration, is difficult to understand.
1
1
6 M. Tanabe and R. H. Peters, Org. Synth., 1981, 60, 92.
7 J. S. Dickschat, C. A. Citron, N. L. Brock, R. Riclea and H. Kuhz,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 3339.
For 2 the obtained spectrum showed enhanced signals at 46.3, 37.6,
and 31.0 ppm (Scheme 4 and Fig. S11–S13 of ESI†). This, together with
2
published NMR data of 2, allowed for conclusions on the stereoche- 18 I. Yamaguchi and N. Takahashi, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1975, 992.
19 A. Preiss, G. Adam, D. Saman and M. Budesinsky, Magn. Reson.
Chem., 1987, 25, 239.
mical course of the FPP cyclisation that proceeds with conversion of the
terminal E methyl group of FPP into the pro-S of the two geminal
2
0 J. S. Dickschat, S. C. Wenzel, H. B. Bode, R. M u¨ ller and S. Schulz,
ChemBioChem, 2004, 5, 778.
13
methyl groups in 2. Finally, incorporation of labelling from [2- C]-12
13
21 N. L. Brock, S. R. Ravella, S. Schulz and J. S. Dickschat, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2100.
2
into 3 was observed by enhanced C signals at 40.39, 40.36, and
5.7 ppm (Scheme 4 and Fig. S14 and S15 of ESI†), in agreement with
2
2 T. G. Randall and R. G. Lawton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 2127.
3
Cane’s earlier report.
23 G. D. Brown, G.-Y. Liang and L.-K. Sy, Phytochemistry, 2003, 64, 303.
5
226 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 5224--5226
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014