K.S. Dalal et al.
Catalysis Communications 152 (2021) 106289
aldehydes and malononitrile. Recently, some environment compatible
catalyst like MCM-41-SO3H [20], Cobalt nanoparticles [21], Cuprous
oxide-Zeolite clinoptilolite nanoparticles [22], Fe3O4@SiO2-BenzIm-Fc
(Cl)/ZnCl2 [23], nano Fe3 O4@SiO2-IL-Fc [24], NH4Cl [25], Fe3O4@-
SiO2-s-triazinium chloride [26], Ultrasonic irradiation [27] and
β-Cyclodextrin [28] were also used to achieve this transformation. Lajis
et al. reported the enzymatic method for the synthesis of kojic acid based
KAD (7-O-kojic acid monopalmitate) using immobilized lipase N435 at
80 ◦C for 4 h in bioreactors (reaction volume 0.12 L) using palmitic acid
and kojic acid as a substrate [29]. Although these methods show good
results, exhibit some limitations such as low conversion rate, high
temperature, toxic reagents and use of strong catalysts. Therefore, it is
important to explore newer biocatalyst with good activity to avoid toxic
chemical catalysts and reagents in the reaction. In continuation of our
work for the synthesis and characterization of promising heterocyclic
compounds [30], we recently developed a new methodology for the
synthesis of ortho-aminocarbonitriles using lipase as a biocatalyst [31].
To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on enzyme-catalyzed
synthesis of kojic acid derivatives using multicomponent reaction of
aromatic aldehydes, malononitrile and kojic acid.
off and washed with acetone. Isolated products were further recrystal-
lized from ethanol to achieve the pure products. The structures of the
products were confirmed by IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, Mass Spectrometry.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Screening of enzymes
In initial phase, the kojic acid (1.0 mmol), malononitrile (1.0 mmol)
and 4-chloro benzaldehyde (1.0 mmol) were used as the model sub-
strates to optimize the reaction conditions (Scheme 1). In order to carry
out the model reaction, different enzymes were tested for the synthesis
of 2-amino-4,8-dihydropyrano [3,2-b]pyran-3‑carbonitrile and the re-
sults are shown in Table 1. The results showed that only 20% yield of
product was obtained when the reaction was carried out in the control
with absence of catalyst (entry 1, Table 1). When lipase from Porcine
pancreas and Candida rugosa were used, the target compound 4b was
obtained with 63% and 69%, yields respectively (entry 2 and 3,
Table 1). The best yield of 95% was achieved using lipase from Asper-
gillus niger (entry 4, Table 1). Under the same condition, the Acylase I
from Aspergillus melleus was used as a catalyst which resulted in low yield
of 50% (entry 5, Table 1). To determine the catalytic effects coming from
enzyme, the control experiments were performed using denatured lipase
that obtained the yield of 21% (entry 6, Table 1). In next experiment,
lipase samples pretreated with urea and PMSF were tested to confirm its
role as enzyme in overall reaction system (entry 7–8, Table 1). The
results indicated that the active ANL is the only enzymatic preparation
capable of performing this reaction with good yield.
2. Experimental section
2.1. General information
Lipase from Aspergillus niger (200 U/g), Lipase from Candida rugosa
(2 U/mg), Lipase from porcine pancreas Type II (100–500 U/mg) and
Acylase I from Aspergillus melleus (0.5 U/mg) were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich. All other chemicals including aldehydes, kojic acid and
malononitrile were purchased from Spectrochem and Sigma-Aldrich,
India and used without further purification. The reactions were moni-
tored by thin-layer chromatography (Hexane: Ethyl acetate, 3:7) using
silica gel-coated plates and EtOAc/hexane solution as the mobile phase.
The spots were visualized under UV light. Melting points of compounds
were recorded in open glass capillary method and were uncorrected. The
NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance-II spectrophotometer
operating at 500, 400 MHz and 125, 100 MHz. Infrared (IR) spectra were
obtained on Shimadzu IR-Affinity spectrometer using KBr pellets.
3.2. Influence of solvents
The reaction medium has always been one of the important influ-
encing factors. The solvents are known to affect the configuration of the
enzyme and hence the enzyme promiscuity also. Several solvents were
screened in this reaction using kojic acid, 4-chlorobenzaldehyde and
malononitrile as a model reaction. As shown in Table 2, the experi-
mental results demonstrate that this reaction went smoothly in the
presence of various proportions of water and ethanol. When the reaction
was carried out in acetonitrile, the yield was just 10% (entry 1, Table 2)
while in ethanol it was 60% (entry 2, Table 2). Methanol gave lesser
yield of 15% (entry 3, Table 2). When the reaction was performed in
pure water, only 42% of yield was obtained. We speculated that the low
yield might be due to poor solubility of the aldehyde in water and the
corresponding Knoevenagel product. (entry 4, Table 2). Therefore, the
model reaction was tested in a 50% aqueous ethanol, so that the solu-
bility could be enhanced. Interestingly, when water and ethanol were
used in equal concentration (1:1) for the reaction, the yield of the
product enhanced dramatically up to 95% (entry 5, Table 2). Many
2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of kojic acid derivatives (4a-4 k)
In a 25 ml round bottom flask containing aromatic aldehyde (1.0
mmol), malononitrile (66 mg, 1.0 mmol), kojic acid (142 mg, 1.0 mmol)
and enzyme (50 mg, 10 U) were added in the mixture of H2O (5 ml) and
ethanol (5 ml) and then stirred at room temperature (RT). Completion of
reaction was confirmed by TLC and the crude solid products were
extracted by adding 10 ml of ethyl acetate to the reaction mixture, fol-
lowed by filtration and evaporation of solvent. The enzyme was filtered
Scheme 1. Model reaction to prepare derivatives of kojic acid
2