ionic liquids have also been widely explored as media for
electrochemical technologies,9 chemical extractions,10 and
other industrial processes.11 This is due to several intriguing
properties of ionic liquids: high thermal and chemical
stability, no measurable vapor pressure, nonflammability,
friction reduction, anti-wear performance, and high loading
capacity. In many cases, the ionic liquids can be recycled
easily. An attractive feature of ionic liquids is that their
solubilities can be tuned readily so that they can phase
separate from organic as well as aqueous media depending
on the choice of cations and anions. Substrate solubility can
also be tuned. For example, recently, “sugar-philic” ionic
liquids have been prepared that are capable of dissolving
carbohydrates such as glucose, cyclodextrin, and even
glycosylated proteins.12 This suggests the possibility of using
these low molecular weight ionic liquids as soluble supports
for organic synthesis. Phase separation between the “ionic
liquid phase”, the organic phase, and the aqueous phase can
be achieved for product separation and purification.13 We
demonstrate the idea with a Suzuki reaction14 by comparing
the reaction under nearly identical conditions using conven-
tional solution phase synthesis versus the ionic liquid
supported synthesis (ILSS).
By comparison, 3-p-iodobenzoyloxyethyl(l-methylimida-
zolium) tetrafluoroborate (5), prepared readily from 3-hy-
droxyethyl(l-methylimidazolium) tetrafluoroborate (6),13a,16
was coupled with 2a under identical reaction conditions.
Evaporation of the reaction mixture under reduced pressure
1
gave the crude product that contained, according to the H
NMR (acetone-d6), the coupled product 8a, unreacted 2a,
and the side product 4a. However, extraction of the crude
product with ether removed the ether soluble 2a and 4a, and
left behind the ether insoluble product 8a, relatively pure
according to NMR. Cleavage of 8a with ammonia/methanol
1
gave 3a, pure according to H NMR, easily separated from
the ionic liquid residue 6 by ether extraction (Scheme 2).17
Scheme 2. Suzuki Reactions of Ionic Liquid Supported
p-Iodobenzoate 5 with Aryl Boronic Acids 2 in Aqueous Media
Methyl p-iodobenzoate (1) was coupled with p-methoxy-
phenylboronic acid (2a) with a catalytic amount of Pd(OAc)2
in an aqueous solution of cesium fluoride under nitrogen at
80 °C for 22 h.15 At the end of reaction, the mixture was
extracted with ether to give the crude product, which
contained the desired coupled product 3a, together with the
unreacted starting materials 1 and 2a and a side product 4a
that was due to self-coupling of 2a (Scheme 1). The relative
The overall yield of 3a from 5 was 73% without the need
for chromatographic purification.
Scheme 1. Suzuki Reactions of Methyl p-Iodobenzoate 1 with
Aryl Boronic Acids 2 in Aqueous Media
We have examined the general scope of the reaction by
coupling 5 with a number of arylboronic acids (Table 1).
The corresponding reactions of 1 were also performed with
the same set of arylboronic acids and the purities of the crude
products were determined by 1H NMR (Table 2). In all cases,
the ionic liquid supported synthesis gave 3 in equal or
superior yields, pure according to NMR, without the need
(13) The use of ionic liquid supported synthesis has been reported, but
its advantage over conventional liquid-phase synthesis has not been
demonstrated. See: (a) Fraga-Dubreuil, J.; Bazureau, J.; Bazureau, J. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6097. (b) Fraga-Dubreuil, J.; Bazureau, J. P.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6121.
(14) For recent reports of Suzuki reaction in water and in ionic liquids,
see: (a) Leadbeater, N. E.; Marco, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2973. (b) Sakurai,
H.; Tsukuda, T.; Hirao, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2721. (c) Mathews, C.
J.; Smith, P. J.; Welton, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1249. (d) Rajagopal, R.;
Jarikote, D. V.; Srinivasan, K. V. Chem. Commun. 2002, 616. (e) Revell,
J. D.; Ganesan, A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3071.
amounts of each were determined by 1H NMR of the crude.
Typically, purification by chromatography of the crude
mixture was performed to give the desired product 3a in
60% yield.
(8) (a) Sheldon, R. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2399. (b) Sheldon, R. A.;
Lau, R. M.; Sorgedrager, M. J.; v. Rantwijk, F.; Seddon, K. R. Green Chem.
2002, 4, 147.
(9) (a) Fuller, J.; Osteryoung, R. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997, 144, 3881.
(b) Fuller, J.; Breda, A. C.; Carlin, T. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 459, 29.
(10) (a) Huddleston, J. G.; Willauer, H.; Swatloski, R. P.; Visser, A. E.;
Rogers, R. D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1765. (b) Bosmann, A.; Datsevich,
L.; Jess, A.; Lauter, A.; Schmitz, C.; Wasserscheid, P. Chem. Commun.
2001, 2494.
(11) Ye, C.; Liu, W.; Chen, Y.; Yu. L. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2244.
(12) (a) Kimizuka, N.; Nakashima, T. Langmuir 2001, 17, 6759. (b) For
other ionic liquids containing PEG, see: Leone, A. M.; Weatherly, S. C.;
Williams, M. E.; Thorp, H. H.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 318.
(15) (a) Wright, S. W.; Hageman, D. L.; McClure, L. D. J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 6095. (b) Bumagin, N. A.; Bykov, V. V. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
14437. (c) Blettner, C. G.; Konig, W. A.; Stenzel, W.; Schotten, T. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 3885. (d) Grasa, G. A.; Hillier, A. C.; Nolan, S. P. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 1077.
(16) Branco, L. C.; Rosa, J. N.; Moura Ramos, J. J.; Afonso, C. A. M.
Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 3671.
(17) Methyl p-iodobenzoate was not observed in the final product under
the reaction conditions. Separate experiments showed that any unreacted 5
would have been recovered as methyl p-iodobenzoate. The less than 100%
yield of 3a was attributed to mechanical loss in the work up process.
5004
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 26, 2003