Reactions of Iodonium and λ3-Bromoiodane
example, spontaneous heterolysis, should be large, as observed
in methanol and could be evaluated at least to the order of 102.
The value obtained in chloroform may be the result of
competition of different reactions, spontaneous heterolysis and
ligand coupling. From the previous kinetic analysis of the SNVσ
reaction of dec-1-enyliodonium salt6 (the last column of Table
2), the relative reactivities of iodonium and iodane are evaluated
to be 11. This rather small value may be a result of the nature
of the transition state of the bimolecular substitution.
The other problem is the relative reactivities of the two
species. In the beginning of this study, we assumed that the
iodanyl group (PhIX-) could be a better leaving group than
the iodonio group (PhI+-) because the hypervalent C-I bond
of iodane is longer than the C-I bond involved in the iodonium
ion,19,20 and, thus, the former may be weaker than the latter.
However, this hypothesis is clearly disproved by the present
kinetic results. The leaving ability of the iodanyl group is about
102 times smaller than that of the iodonio group. Our previous
conclusion that the leaving ability of the phenyliodonio group
(PhI+-) is about 106 times greater than that of triflate was
obtained from the solvolysis in aqueous ethanol,1 and this refers
to the iodonio group. The iodanyl group (PhIBr-) is only 104-
fold better than triflate as a leaving group.
Iodonium salts are often called iodane12,13 because species
represented by R2IX can exist either in an ionic or in a covalent
form; an electronegative ligand X may be anionic or may form
a hypervalent (covalent) bond to the iodine. There is a strong
argument in favor of the iodane nomenclature13 on the basis of
the structure of the iodonium salts in a crystalline form, where
the iodine moiety is T-shaped and the counteranion locates on
the apical direction of the polyvalent iodine.13-15 There is
hypervalent interaction, but the separation between the iodine
and the stable anion, like tetrafluoroborate or triflate, is quite
large, suggesting the ionic character of this bonding.14,15 The
triflate in iodonium crystals has a weak interaction with the
iodine through one of the three oxygen atoms of the sulfonate
group, but these oxygen atoms are apparently equivalent,16
characteristic of the triflate anion. Furthermore, the iodane
obviously dissociates in solution, as the UV spectrum suggests.
Molecular weight17 and conductivity measurements18 show that
the dissociation in solution results in the formation of the
iodonium ion. That is, both iodonium and iodane forms do exist
in solution in a proportion that is dependent on the concentration
and the dissociation constant, which is very dependent on the
counteranion and solvent.
Experimental Section
Substrates 1a and 1b, solvents, and tetrabutylammonium salts
were obtained as described previously.1,5,6 All the products were
characterized by NMR and MS spectra and compared with reported
data.1,3
Reactions were carried out on a scale of a 1-5 mL solution
containing 1-10 mg of the substrate 1, and products were
determined by vapor-phase chromatography in the same way as
before.1,5,6 The UV absorbance changes were recorded on a
spectrophotometer Shimadzu UV-2200. The measurements of the
initial absorbance and the reaction rates were also done in the same
way as described for similar iodonium salts.1,5,6
Acknowledgment. The initial part of this work was started
in collaboration with Professor Masahito Ochiai during the study
on the solvolysis reported in ref 1. We are grateful for his
valuable suggestions on this manuscript. Also acknowledged
is financial support by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on
Priority Area, Reaction Control of Dynamic Complexes, from
the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Tech-
nology, Japan.
(12) Varvoglis, A. HyperValent Iodine in Organic Synthesis; Academic
Press: San Diego, California, 1997; p 3.
(13) (a) Ochiai, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 611, 494-508. (b) Ochiai,
M. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry. In Topics in Current Chemistry; Wirth,
T., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2003; Vol. 224, pp 5-68.
(14) Stang, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 274-285.
(15) Koser, G. F. In The Chemistry of Functional Groups; Supplement
D2; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, 1995; Chapter 21.
(16) Stang, P. J.; Arif, A. M.; Crittell, C. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1990, 29, 287-288.
(17) Ochiai, M.; Kida, M.; Sato, K.; Takino, T.; Goto, S.; Donkai, N.;
Okuyama, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1559-1562.
(18) Kline, E. R.; Kraus, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 814-816.
(19) Zhdankin, V. V.; Stang, P. J. In Chemistry of HyperValent
Compounds; Akiba, K.-y., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999; p 329.
JO0523013
(20) The apical C-S bond of sulfurane (1.926 Å in o,o′-bisbi-
phenylylenesulfurane)20a is also obviously longer than the sulfonium C-S
bond (1.80 Å).20b (a) Ogawa, S.; Matsunaga, Y.; Sato, S.; Iida, I.; Furukawa,
N. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1141-1142. (b) Perozzi, E. F.;
Paul, I. C. In The Chemistry of the Sulphonium Group; Part 1; Stirling, C.
J. M., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, England, 1981; Chapter 2.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2006 1613