Scheme 1. Synthetic routes of ACRDSO2 and PXZDSO2. i) Bromine, acetic acid, 80 °C; ii) H2O2 (30%), acetic acid, dichloromethane, 90 °C;
iii) 4-bromoiodobenzene, K2CO3, Cu, N,N-dimethylformamide, 160 °C; iv) bis(pinacolato)diboron, CH3COOK, Pd(dppf)Cl2, dioxane, 80 °C; v) Pd(PPh3)4,
K2CO3, toluene/EtOH = 3/1, 90 °C; vi) 1,4-dibromobenzene, K2CO3, toluene/EtOH = 3/1, 9 °C; and vii) phenoxazine, tri-tert-butylphosphine, sodium
tert-butoxide, palladium acetate, toluene, 110 °C.
126.65, 126.05, 125.40, 124.55, 120.94, 114.00. EI-MS (m/z): calcd for
C
based on ACRDSO2 without any hole-transport layer exhibits
30H19NO5S2 537.61; found, 538.0 [M+]. Anal. calcd for C30H19NO5S2: C
obviously lower driving voltage and higher EQE (17.5%) in
comparison with the well-known green TADF emitter 4CzIPN
in the same device structure. In addition, the PXZDSO2-based
solution-processed device exhibits a maximal EQE of 15.2%,
which is the first reported solution-processed TADF-based
OLED that exhibits competitive performance compared with
the corresponding vacuum-deposited devices other than green
TADF OLEDs. Moreover, all the devices exhibit slight efficiency
roll-off with EQE values exceeding 13% at the luminance of
1000 cd m−2, which can be mainly attributed to triplet–triplet
annihilation. The current findings validate a practical strategy
to develop evaporation- and solution-process-feasible metal-free
highly efficient fluorescent emitters for OLED applications.
67.02, H 3.56, N 2.61, S 11.93; Found: C 67.28, H 3.22, N 2.68, S 12.41.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or
from the author.
Acknowledgements
The authors greatly appreciate the financial support from the Ministry
of Science and Technology (2015CB655003 and 2014DFA52030), the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (91233116 and 51073057),
the Ministry of Education (NCET-11-0159), and the Guangdong Natural
Science Foundation (S2012030006232).
Experimental Section
Received: July 4, 2015
Revised: September 13, 2015
Published online: November 9, 2015
Materials: All solvents and reagents were used as received from
commercial suppliers without any further purification. 9,9-Dimethyl-
9,10-dihydroacridine (S3) was synthesized according to literature
procedures.[17] Synthetic routes of the compounds ACRDSO2 and
PXZDSO2 are shown in Scheme 1, and they were further purified by
repeated temperature gradient vacuum sublimation. Details of syntheses
are shown in the Supporting Information.
2-[4-(9,9-Dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine)phenyl]thianthrene-9,9′,10,10′-
tetraoxide (ACRDSO2): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ) 8.54–8.55 (d,
J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 8.37–8.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.31–8.32 (m, 2H), 8.07–
8.12 (m, 1H), 7.86–7.91 (m, 4H), 7.47–7.53 (m, 4H), 6.96–7.00 (m, 4H),
6.29–6.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.71(s, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3,
δ): 146.24, 142.97, 140.02, 137.97, 137.08, 133.76, 132.47, 131.68,
130.11, 127.35, 123.74, 120.94, 114.00, 31.24. EI-MS (electron ionization
mass spectrometry, m/z): calcd for C33H25NO4S2 563.69; found, 564.2
[M+]; Anal. calcd for C 70.31, H 4.47, N 2.48, S 11.38; Found: C 70.36, H
4.23, N 2.54, S 11.75.
[1] C. W. Tang, S. A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913.
[2] Y. G. Ma, H. Zhang, J. C. Shen, C. Che, Synth. Met. 1998, 94, 245.
[3] B. W. D’Andrade, S. R. Forrest, Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1585.
[4] L. J. Rothberg, A. J. Lovinger, J. Mater. Res. 1996, 11, 3174.
[5] M. A. Baldo, S. R. Forrest, M. E. Thompson, Organic Electrolumines-
cence, (Ed: Z. H. Kafafi), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA 2005.
[6] H. Uoyama, K. Goushi, K. Shizu, H. Nomura, C. Adachi, Nature
2012, 492, 234.
[7] B. Milian-Medina, J. Gierschner, Org. Electron. 2012, 13, 985.
[8] S. Y. Lee, T. Yasuda, H. Nomura, C. Adachi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012,
101, 93306.
[9] T. Nakagawa, S. Y. Ku, K. T. Wong, C. Adachi, Chem. Commun. 2012,
48, 9580.
2-(4-Phenoxazinephenyl)thianthrene-9,9′,10,10′-tetraoxide (PXZDSO2):
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ) 8.50–8.51 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H),
8.31–8.37 (m, 3H), 8.07–8.08 (m, 1H), 7.86–7.87 (m, 4H), 7.53–7.54
(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.68–6.73 (m, 4H), 6.62–6.64 (m, 2H) 5.97–5.99
(d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 146.24, 142.96,
140.40, 139.65, 137.97, 137.08, 133.76, 132.46, 131.68, 130.27, 129.95,
[10] G. Méhes, H. Nomura, Q. Zhang, T. Nakagawa, C. Adachi, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11311.
[11] B. Li, H. Nomura, H. Miyazaki, Q. Zhang, K. Yoshida, Y. Suzuma,
A. Orita, J. Otera, C. Adachi, Chem. Lett. 2014, 43, 319.
©
186 wileyonlinelibrary.com
2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 181–187