554
G.A. Guirgis et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 563±564 ꢀ2001) 551±554
phase ꢀxenon solution) without carrying out a
temperature dependant study of the infrared spectrum.
In order to determine the enthalpy difference, DH,
between the conformers of 3-methyl-3-butene nitrile,
the relative intensities of the pair of bands at 551 ꢀcis)
and 570 ꢀgauche) cm were measured as a function
of temperature from 255 to 21008C. The results are
summarized in Table 1 and show that the intensities of
the cis band increases,as the temperature is decreased
compared to the intensities of the gauche band.
Utilizing the van't Hoff equation,this conformer
[2] J.R. Durig,G.A. Guirgis,A.S. Drew,J. Raman Spectrosc. 25
1994) 907.
3] W.A. Herrebout,B.J. van der Veken,J. Phys. Chem. 100
1996) 9671.
ꢀ
[
[
ꢀ
4] W.A. Herrebout,B.J. van der Veken,A. Wang,J.R. Durig,J.
Phys. Chem. 99 ꢀ1995) 578.
[5] M.O. Bulanin,J. Mol. Struct. 347 ꢀ1995) 73.
21
[
6] B.J. van der Veken,F.R. DeMunck,J. Chem. Phys. 97 ꢀ1992)
060.
3
[
[
[
7] M.O. Bulanin,J. Mol. Struct. 19 ꢀ1973) 59.
8] C. Moller,M.S. Plesset,Phys. Rev. 46 ꢀ1934) 618.
9] M.J. Frisch,G.W. Trucks,H.B. Schlegel,G.E. Scuseria,M.A.
Robb,J.R. Cheeseman,V.G. Zakrzewski,J.A. Montgomery,
R.E. Stratmann,J.C. Burant,S. Dapprich,J.M. Millam,A.D.
Daniels,K.N. Kudin,M.C. Strain,O. Farkas,J. Tomasi,
V. Barone,M. Cossi,R. Cammi,B. Mennucci,C. Pomelli,
C. Adamo,S. Clifford,J. Ochterski,G.A. Petersson,P.Y.
Ayala,Q. Cui,K. Morokuma,D.K. Malick,A.D. Rabuck,
K. Raghavachari,J. B. Foresman,J. Cioslowski,J.V. Ortiz,
B.B. Stefanov,G. Liu,A. Liashenko,P. Piskorz,I. Komaromi,
R. Gomperts,R.L. Martin,D.J. Fox,T. Keith,M.A.
Al-Laham,C.Y. Peng,A. Nanayakkara,C. Gonzalez,
M. Challacombe,P.M.W. Gill,B.G. Johnson,W. Chen,
M.W. Wong,J.L. Andres,M. Head-Gordon,E.S. Replogle,
J.A. Pople, Gaussian 98 ꢀRevision A.7),Gaussian,Inc.,
Pittsburgh,PA,1998.
2
1
pair gives a DH value of 174 ^ 20 cm
0
ꢀ2:08 ^
:24 kJ=mol with the cis conformer the more stable
form. This value should be a reasonable estimate for
the enthalpy difference in the gas phase as discussed
elsewhere [3±7]. Since both of these molecules have
an ethalpy difference considerably smaller than the
2
1
value of 336 ^ 61 cm reported [2] for 3-buteneni-
trile,it brings into question the correctness of this
value. Therefore,the enthalpy value for 3-buteneni-
trile should be determined again.
[
10] P. Pulay,Mol. Phys. 17 ꢀ1969) 197.
References
[1] G.H. Grif®th,L.A. Harrah,J.W. Clark,J.R. Durig,J. Mol.
Struct. 4 ꢀ1969) 255.