Organic Letters
Letter
significantly enhancing the scope of the herein described
method.
Scheme 3. Competition Experiments
We then carried out some key mechanistic experiments.
Because it was observed that electron-poor benzotriazoles (e.g.,
dihalides and tetrahalides) resulted in lower conversion to the
desired heterocoupling product, such as for 3ac, we ran a
couple of competition experiments in order to probe the
relative philicity of each coupling partner in this reaction
(Scheme 3). From the latter it can be concluded that both
amides and benzotriazoles convert faster to the desired N−N
coupling product if they are more electron rich. There thus
does not exist any clear electrophile−nucleophile relationship
between the two coupling partners during the rate determining
step(s). Next, the reaction was also attempted by replacing N-
methoxy benzamide with N-methyl benzamide or N-phenyl
benzamide. No conversion occurred however in such cases,
suggesting that the N-methoxy group is essential and plays an
enabling role in this reaction. Furthermore, the fact that only
hypervalent iodine compounds competently operate as
oxidants in this reaction, in contrast to K2S2O8, Ag2O,
chloramine-T, DTBP, or O2, suggests the structural involve-
ment of the oxidant.
In order to elucidate the sequence of events that lead to the
N−N hetero-coupling product, we then performed sequential
addition experiments (Scheme 4). We thus initiated the
reaction while omitting either the benzotriazole (Experiment
A) or alternatively the amide (Experiment B). After 16 h, the
second substrate was added. Remarkably, no N−N hetero-
coupling product could be detected in the first scenario
(Experiment A), while a good yield of product 3ba was
obtained in the second scenario (Experiment B, Scheme 4). It
can therefore be concluded that the amide substrate
irreversibly decays in the presence of PIDA, while the
benzotriazole survives. The oxidative decay byproducts could
not be identified at this stage. This nevertheless suggests a
competing N−H activation scenario, wherein only the
activation of the benzotriazole would be reversible under
reaction conditions, justifying the need for an excess. These
mechanistic elements are summarized in Scheme 5.
Scheme 4. Sequential Addition Experiments
Next, the reaction could be scaled up with only minor
adjustments (reaction temperature from 40 to 60 °C, Scheme
Scheme 5. Proposed Reaction Mechanism
panol (HFIP) provided the best results. With the optimized
conditions in hand, the substrate scope of the reaction was
then investigated. Several N-methoxyamides and benzotria-
zoles were tested, which showed remarkable functional group
tolerance (Scheme 2). For example, alkyl, halide, CF3, cyano,
and carboxyl ester groups on both the amide and triazole gave
their corresponding N−N cross-coupled products in good
yields. When monosubstituted benzotriazoles are engaged,
isomeric mixtures of products are typically obtained due to
similarly reacting and no longer symmetrical N-centers. For
example, benzotriazole-6-carbonitrile led to an encouraging 1
to 2.2 mixture (3ak and 3ak′), whereas 7-methyl-benzotriazole
led to a 1 to 2.5 mixture of regioisomers (3aj and 3aj′).
Unfortunately, none of the regioisomers could be assigned at
this stage due to inconclusive NOESY characterization.
Importantly, however, ubiquitous aliphatic amides were well
accommodated in the reaction (3sa, 3sb, 3ta, 3ua), thus
3904
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3902−3907