G. Guanti, R. Ri6a / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 357–360
359
Other methods, tested in order to improve most of all
the stereoselectivity, like for example Jacobsen cata-
6. Armstrong, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998,
371–388.
21
lyst in the presence of mCPBA or NaClO, or t-
7. All new compounds reported in this paper have been
22
25
D
1
13
BuOOH in the presence of VO(acac)2
were
fully characterized ([h] , IR, GC–MS, H and
C
absolutely unsatisfactory: with the first conditions
only traces of the desired epoxides were obtained
starting from 22, while, with the second reagent, an
extensive decomposition of the starting compound 25
was observed. The mixture of the diastereomeric
NMR).
8
9
. Banfi, L.; Guanti, G.; Riva, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
999, 10, 3571–3592.
1
. We experienced an analogous behavior on very similar
compounds, as reported in Ref. 8.
2
3
epoxides could not be separated and was converted
as such, by acidic or basic hydrolysis, into the final
products, that were quite easily separated by chro-
matography. Under acidic conditions, compounds 28
and 29 were obtained in moderate overall yield but
with complete retention of the d.r. of the starting
epoxides. On the other hand, the basic hydrolysis of
1
1
0. Ariza, X.; Urp ´ı , F.; Viladomat, C.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9101–9102.
1. The preparation of 15 by protection of 13 as THP ether,
followed by azide reduction and introduction of the
carbamate moiety, was less satisfactory giving an overall
yield of 71%.
1
1
2. While we are not able to explain the low yield of 10, the
moderate yield of 18 is in part due to the competitive
intramolecular silyl migration from oxygen to nitrogen,
as previously experienced on monosilyl ethers of
THYM*. This problem was however solved using a
bulkier silylated group.
3. (a) Miller, S. J.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 5855–5856; (b) Jo, E.; Na, Y.; Chang, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5581–5582; (c) Schleich, S.;
Helmchen, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2515–2521; (d)
Souers, A. J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
1222–1224; (e) Taniguchi, T.; Ogasawara, K. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 3193–3195; (f) Kumareswaran, R.; Balasubrama-
nian, T.; Hassner, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8157–
8162; (g) Agami, C.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4639–4643; (h) Mues, H.; Kazmaier,
U. Synthesis 2001, 487–498; (i) Banba, Y.; Abe, C.;
Nemoto, H.; Kato, A.; Adachi, I.; Takahata, H. Tetra-
hedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 817–819; (j) Varray, S.;
Lazaro, R.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2
6 and 27, furnished 28 and 29 with and a remark-
able changement of the d.r., with stereoisomer 29 pre-
vailing in this case. These data suggest that, only
under acidic conditions, the epoxide opening is
regioselective. Finally, the spectroscopic data of both
17,19
triols agree with those reported in literature
and,
in particular, the optically rotatory value of 28 fits
24
well with the reported one, thus demonstrating that
the whole sequence proceeded without racemization.
We are now trying to investigate more in detail the
mechanistically aspects of the last reactions, that have
never been pointed out in similar projects. Further-
more, we are also studying other stereoselective addi-
tions to the double bond of 22 and 25 in order to
synthesize new highly functionalized piperidine deriva-
tives of great interest for their potential biological
activity. Our data will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgements
2002, 2308–2316.
1
4. Only recently the enzymatic kinetic resolution of a com-
pound similar to 20–22 has been reported Altenbach,
H.-J.; Blanda, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1519–
The authors gratefully thank Amano for a generous
gift of lipase from Pseudomonas cepacia, the Univer-
sity of Genova and MURST (COFIN 00) for finan-
cial support and Ms Monica Paravidino for her help
in this work.
1524.
1
5. Lillelund, V. H.; Jensen, H. H.; Liang, X. F.; Bols, M.
Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 515–553 and references cited
therein.
1
6. Several enantioselective synthesis of 28, passing through
different intermediates, are known. See: (a) Jespersen,
T. M.; Dong, W.; Sierks, M. R.; Skrydstrup, T.; Lundt,
I.; Bols, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33,
References
1
2
. Banfi, L.; Guanti, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 745–757
and references cited therein.
1
778–1779; (b) Ichikawa, Y.; Igarashi, Y.; Ichikawa,
M.; Suhara, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3007–
018; (c) Kim, Y. J.; Ichikawa, M.; Ichikawa, Y. J.
. The S enantiomer was obtained in 97% e.e. by monohy-
drolysis of the corresponding diacetate catalyzed by com-
mercially available PPL, while the R enantiomer was
prepared in 98% e.e. by monoacylation of the corre-
sponding diol catalyzed by PPL supported on Celite.
. (a) Guanti, G.; Banfi, L.; Narisano, E. J. Org. Chem.
992, 57, 1540–1554 for the S enantiomer; (b) Guanti, G.;
Banfi, L.; Riva, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 9–12
for the R enantiomer.
3
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2599–2602; (d) Pandey, G.;
Kapur, M. Synthesis 2001, 1263–1267; (e) Zhao, G.
H.; Deo, U. C.; Ganem, B. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 201–203;
3
(
3
f) Andersch, J.; Bols, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3744–
747.
1
17. Jespersen, T. M.; Bols, M.; Sierks, M. R.; Skrydstrup, T.
4
. Guanti, G.; Moro, A.; Narisano, E. Tetrahedron Lett.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 13449–13460.
2
000, 41, 3203–3207.
18. Only the synthesis of (ent)-29 was reported; Kazmaier,
U.; Schneider, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 817–818.
19. Hansen, S. U.; Bols, M. J. Chem Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2000, 911–915.
5
. This work was presented at IUPAC 14th International
Conference on Organic Synthesis, Christchurch (NZ),
1
4–18 July 2002.