22
K. Walczyn´ski et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 40 (2005) 15–23
1H(5); J = 5.3 Hz); 7.25–7.20 (dd, 1H(4); J = 5.3, 1 Hz); 3.80–
3.75 (m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.60–2.55 (m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.40–
2.35 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz); 1.60–1.50 (m, 2H); 0.96–0.91 (t, 3H;
J = 7.3 Hz); TLC(a) Rf = 0.35.
Male guinea-pigs weighing 300–400 g were sacrificed by
a blow on the head.A portion of the small intestine, 20–50 cm
proximal to the ileocaecal valve (jejunum), was removed and
placed in Krebs buffer (composition (mM) NaCl 118; KCl
5.6; MgSO4 1.18; CaCl2 2.5; NaH2PO4 1.28; NaHCO3 25;
glucose 5.5). Whole jejunum segments (2 cm) were prepared
and mounted between two platinum electrodes (4 mm apart)
in 20 ml Krebs buffer, continuously gassed with 95% O2:5%
CO2 and maintained at 37 °C. Contractions were recorded
isotonically under 1 g tension with Hugo Sachs Hebel-
Messvorsatz (Tl-2)/HFmodem (Hugo Sachs Electronik, Hug-
stetten, Germany) connected to a pen recorder. After equili-
bration for 1 h with washings every 10 min, the muscle
segments were stimulated maximally between 15 and 20 V
and continuously at a frequency of 0.1 Hz and a duration of
0.5 ms, with rectangular-wave electrical pulses, delivered by
a Grass Stimulator S-88 (Grass Instruments Co., Quincy,
USA).After 30 min of stimulation, cumulative concentration–
response curves (half-log increments) of (R)-a-
methylhistamine, H3-agonist, were recorded until no further
change in response was found. The tested compounds were
added 20 min before generation of concentration–response
curves with (R)-a-methylhistamine as H3-agonist. Statistical
analysis was carried out with the Students’t-test. In all test P
< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The potency
of an antagonist is expressed by its pA2 value, calculated from
the Arunlakshana and Schild [50] regression analysis where
at least three concentrations were used.
4g. C13H18N4O (278.00); Yield 76%; m.p. 86–87 °C (for
free base) and >300 °C (for dihydrobromide); 1H NMR (d in
ppm; CDCl3): 8.65 (d, 1H(4); J = 1.0); 8.30–8.25 (d, 1H(6)
;
J = 5.5 Hz); 7.25–7.20 (dd, 1H(7); J = 5.5, 1 Hz); 3.80–3.75
(m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.65–2.55 (m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.40–2.35 (t,
2H, J = 7.7 Hz); 1.65–1.55 (m, 2H); 0.96–0.91 (t, 3H;
J = 7.3 Hz); TLC(a) Rf = 0.33.
4h. C13H18N4O (278.00); Yield 90%; m.p. 76–78 °C (for
free base) and >300 °C (for dihydrobromide); 1H NMR (d in
ppm; CDCl3): 8.25–8.00 (dd, 1H(5); J = 5.1, 1.5 Hz); 7.457.40
(dd, 1H(7); J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz); 7.25–7.2 (dd, 1H(6); J = 8.0,
5.1 Hz); 3.80–3.70 (m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.35–2.30 (m, 4H“pip
-
erazine”); 2.20–2.15 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz); 1.50–1.45 (m, 2H);
0.96–0.91 (t, 3H; J = 7.3 Hz); TLC(a) Rf = 0.40.
5.1.8. General method for the preparation
of 1-[(2-thiazolobenzo)-4-n-propyl]piperazine (9)
and 1-[(2-oxazolobenzo)-4-n-propyl]piperazine (10)
To a refluxing mixture of the 1-n-propylpiperazine (5)
(1.28 g, 0.01 mol) and sodium bicarbonate (1.68, 0.02 mol)
in 70 ml of 80% 2-PrOH a solution of 2-chlorobenzothiazole
(7) (0.85 g, 0.005) or 2-chlorobenzooxazole (8) (0.77 g,
0.005 mol) in 4 ml of 2-PrOH was added dropwise. The mix-
ture was refluxed 24 h. The solvent was evaporated under
reduced pressure, and the sticky oil residue was suspended in
100 ml of water. After stirring for 1 h, the mixture was
extracted with CH2Cl2, and the solvent was removed in vacuo.
The products (9) and (10) were purified by column chroma-
tography.
References
[1] J.M. Arrang, M. Garbarg, J.C. Schwartz, Neuroscience 23 (1987)
149–157.
[2] J.M. Arrang, M. Garbarg, J.C. Schwartz, Neuroscience 15 (1985)
553–562.
[3] E. Schlicker, R. Betz, M. Göthert, Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch.
Pharmacol. 337 (1988) 588–590.
[4] J. Clapham, G.J. Kilpatrick, Br. J. Pharmacol. 107 (1992) 919–923.
[5] M. Ichinose, P.J. Barnes, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 174 (1989) 49–55.
[6] E. Schlicker, K. Fink, M. Hinterthaner, M. Göthert, Arch. Pharmacol.
340 (1989) 633–638.
[7] T.W. Lovenberg, B.L. Roland, S.J. Wilson, J. Pyati, A. Huvar,
M.R. Jackson, et al., Mol. Pharmacol. 55 (1999) 1101–1107.
[8] G. Drutel, N. Peitsaro, K. Karlsted, K. Wieland, M.J. Smit, H. Tim-
merman, et al., Mol. Pharm. 59 (2001) 1–8.
[9] S. Morisset, A. Sasse, F. Gbahou, A. Heron, X. Ligneau, J. Tardivel-
Lacombe, et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 280 (2001)
75–80.
9. C14H19N3S (261.00); Yield 43% (Ref. [41] 43%); m.p.
100–101 °C (for free base) and 285–287 °C (for dihydrobro-
mide) (Ref. [41] 100–101 °C and for dihydrobromide 285–
1
287 °C); H NMR (d in ppm; CDCl3): 7.6–7.55 (d, 1H;
J = 8 Hz); 7.40–7.35 (d, 1H; J = 7.9 Hz); 7.25–7.20 (dd, 1H;
J = 7.9, 5.9 Hz); 7.05–7.00 (dd, 1H; J = 8.0, 5.9 Hz); 3.80–
3.75 (m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.55–2.45 (t, 4H“piperazine”); 2.35–
2.30 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz); 1.60–1.55 (m, 2H); 1.00–0.90 (t, 3H;
J = 7.3 Hz); TLC(a) Rf = 0.46.
10. C14H19N3O (245.00); Yield 50%; m.p. 92–94 °C (for
1
free base) and 291–293 °C (for dihydrobromide); H NMR
(d in ppm; CDCl3): 7.4–7.36 (d, 1H; J = 8 Hz); 7.35–7.30 (d,
1H; J = 7.9 Hz); 7.25–7.20 (dd, 1H; J = 7.9, 5.9 Hz); 7.05–
6.95 (dd, 1H; J = 8.0, 5.9 Hz); 3.75–3.70 (m, 4H“piperazine”);
2.55–2.40 (m, 4H“piperazine”); 2.35–2.30 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz);
1.60–1.55 (m, 2H); 0.95–0.90 (t, 3H; J = 7.1 Hz); TLC(a) Rf
= 0.41.
[10] S. Miyazaki, M. Imaizumi, K. Onodera, Life Sci. 57 (1995) 2137–
2144.
[11] P. Blandina, M. Giorgetti, L. Bartolini, M. Cecchi, H. Timmerman,
R. Leurs, et al., Br. J. Pharmacol. 119 (1996) 1656–1664.
[12] K. Onodera, S. Miyazaki, M. Imaizumi, H. Stark, W. Schunack,
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 357 (1998) 508–513.
[13] H. Yokoyama, K. Onodera, K. Iinuma, T. Watanabe, Eur. J. Pharma-
col. 234 (1993) 129–133.
5.2. Pharmacology
[14] H. Yokoyama, K. Onodera, K. Maeyama, E. Sakurai, K. Iinuma,
R. Leurs, et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol. 260 (1994) 23–28.
[15] P. Panula, K. Kuokkanen, M. Relja, K.S. Eriksson, T. Sallmen,
J.O. Rinne, et al., Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 21 (1977) 34.
All compounds were tested for H3-antagonistic effects in
vitro on the guinea-pig jejunum [49] using standard meth-
ods.