10.1002/chem.202100552
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
Experimental Section
Acknowledgements
Mechano-chemical synthesis of NaBH4
This work was financially supported by the National
Natural
Science Foundation of China Projects (Nos. 51771075 and No.
52001125) and Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
NSFC51621001). Z.H. acknowledges support under the
Australian Research Council‘s Discovery Projects funding
scheme (project number DP170101773).
Na2B4O7·10H2O (ACS-grade, Aladdin), Na2B4O7·5H2O (purity: ≥99.5%,
Chron Chemicals), Al (purity: ≥99%, Aladdin), Al88Si12 alloy (purity: 99%,
Aike Reagent), Si (powder, 1 µm, Desheng Alloy Materials Co., Ltd),
NaOH (purity: ≥99%, Aladdin), Na2CO3 (purity: ≥99.8%, General-
Reagent), and NaH (purity: 90%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used as received
for the mechano-chemical synthesis of NaBH4. All the raw materials
except Na2B4O7·xH2O (x=5, 10) are stored in an argon glove box
(MIKROUNA, China) with <0.1 ppm H2O and O2. 1 g of reactants were
put in an 80 mL jar with 50 g of two different sized steel balls. Effects of
ball milling duration and atomic ratios among the start materials on the
yield were studied. In a shaker mill, impact is the most dominant force,
which benefits the mechanochemical reactions. This is in contrast to a
planetary mill which generates friction, shear, and impacts.[21] Besides,
shaker mills are generally capable of operating with higher rotation
speeds. As a result, the shaker ball mill could supply higher energy to
efficiently pulverize particles to allow better mechanochemical reactions.
Shaker mills have been found to be more effective in promoting the
NaBH4 formation, as compared with planetary mills.[5e] All reactions were
conducted in a shaker mill (QM-3C, Nanjing, China) at 1200 cycles per
min (CPM) at room temperature. To prevent overheating, the ball milling
process was conducted by alternating 30 min of milling and 30 min of
rest. Note that the ball-milling times mentioned in articles do not include
the pauses.
Keywords: aluminum • borax • borohydride • hydrogen •
hydrogen storage
[1]
a) M. S. Dresselhaus, I. L. Thomas, Nature 2001, 414, 332; b) P. Jena,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 206-211; c) N. Onishi, M. Iguchi, X. Yang,
R. Kanega, H. Kawanami, Q. Xu, Y. Himeda, Adv. Energy Mater. 2019,
9, 1801275.
[2]
[3]
a) U. B. Demirci, P. Miele, Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 627-637; b) A.
Serov, A. Aziznia, P. H. Benhangi, K. Artyushkova, P. Atanassov, E.
Gyenge, J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 14384-1439.
a) H. I. Schlesinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 215-219; b) T. F.
Hung, H. C. Kuo, C. W. Tsai, H. M. Chen, R. S. Liu, B. J. Weng, J. F.
Lee, J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11754-11759; c) Z. Huang, S. Wang, R.
D. Dewhurst, N. V. Ignat'ev, M. Finze, H. Braunschweig, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8800-8816; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 8882-8900; d)
S. M. Kwon, M. J. Kim, S. Kang, T. Kim, Appl. Energy 2019, 251,
113331.
Quantification of NaBH4
[4]
[5]
L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, Nature 2001, 414, 353-358.
a) Y. Kojima, T. Haga, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2003, 28, 989-993; b) Z.
P. Li, B. H. Liu, N. Morigasaki, S. Suda, J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 354,
243-247; c) B. H. Liu, Z. P. Li, S. Suda, J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 474,
321-325; d) B. H. Liu, Z. P. Li, N. Morigasaki, S. Suda, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 2008, 33, 1323-1328; e) C. L. Hsueh, C. H. Liu, B. H. Chen, C.
Y. Chen, Y. C. Kuo, K. J. Hwang, J. R. Ku, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
2009, 34, 1717-1725; f) Ç. Çakanyıldırım, M. Gürü, Renewable Energy
2010, 35, 1895-1899; g) L. Kong, X. Cui, H. Jin, J. Wu, H. Du, T. Xiong,
Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 5049-5054; h) Z. P. Li, B. H. Liu, J. K. Zhu, N.
Morigasaki, S. Suda, J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 437, 311-316; i) S. Suda,
N. Morigasaki, Y. Iwase, Z. P. Li, J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 404–406,
643-647.
Anhydrous ethylenediamine (C2H8N2, Sigma-Aldrich, purity: 99%) was
used to extract NaBH4 from the milled products under an Ar atmosphere.
The filtrate was collected after passing through polytetrafluoroethylene
membrane (0.45 μm) and then dried in a freeze dryer, where the solvent
vapor (C2H8N2) was captured by a cold trap (-54°C ). The amount of
resultant NaBH4 was determined by iodimetric analysis [15]. H2SO4 (GR),
sodium thiosulfate solution (Na2S2O3, 0.1000 mol L-1), potassium iodide
(KI, purity: ≥99%), potassium iodate (KIO3, AR-grade), and starch
indicator (≥99%) were used for iodimetric analysis. All these chemicals
were purchased from Aladdin and used without further purification. The
yield of NaBH4 was calculated according to formula: [5g]
Yield = [(obtained mass NaBH4)/(theoretical mass NaBH4)]×100% (3)
where the theoretical mass NaBH4 is calculated based upon the
assumption that 1 mole Na2B4O7·xH2O (x=5,10) can produce 4 moles
NaBH4.
[6]
a) B. German, S. Werner, US Pat. 3505035A, 1996; b) İ. Kayacan, Ö. M.
Doğan, B. Z. Uysal, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 7410-7415; c) Z.
P. Li, N. Morigazaki, B. H. Liu, S. Suda, J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 349,
232-236; d) C. Çakanyıldırım, M. Gürü, Energy Sources 2012, 34,
1104-1113.
Characterization
[7]
[8]
[9]
A. M. Beaird, P. Li, H. S. Marsh, W. A. Alsaidi, J. K. Johnson, M. A.
Matthews, C. T. Williams, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 7746-7752.
A. Ekmekyapar, A. Ahmet Baysar, A. Künkül, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
1997, 36, 3487-3490.
The obtained powders were subjected to qualitative analyses using
powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FT-IR) and solid-state 11B nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectroscopy. The crystal phase composition of the samples was
characterized by XRD using a PANalytical Empyrean with a Cu Kα
radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm, step size = 0.262°, integration time 300
s/step) at 40 mA and 45 kV. During the test, the sample was covered
with Scotch tape to prevent exposure to air. To characterize chemical
bonds in the samples, FTIR (Nicolet IS50) spectra were collected in the
transmission mode. The sample was mixed with KBr powders (weight
ratio of 1:99) and then pressed into pellets under 20 MPa. The spectra
were recorded in the range of 400-4000 cm-1 with a resolution of 4 cm-1.
The NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 400 NMR
a) L. Ouyang, W. Chen, J. Liu, M. Felderhoff, H. Wang, M. Zhu, Adv.
Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700299; b) Y. Zhu, L. Ouyang, H. Zhong, H.
Wang, H. Shao, Z. Huang, M. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59,
8623-8629; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 8701-8707; c) Y. Zhu, L. Ouyang,
H. Zhong, H. Wang, H. Shao, Z. Huang, M. Zhu, ACS Sustainable
Chem. Eng. 2020, 59, 8623-8629.
[10]
a) H. Zhong, L. Ouyang, M. Zeng, J. Liu, H. Wang, H. Shao, M.
Felderhoff, M. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 10723–10728; b) H.
Zhong, L. Z. Ouyang, J. S. Ye, J. W. Liu, H. Wang, X. D. Yao, M. Zhu,
Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 7, 222-2288.
[11] a) B. H. Liu, Z. P. Li, N. Morigasaki, S. Suda, Energy Fuels 2008, 22,
1894-1896; b) B. H. Liu, P. L. Zhou, K. Z. Jing, N. Morigasaki, S. Suda,
Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 1707-1711.
spectrometer using a 4 mm CP-MAS probe and a spinning speed of νR
=
8.0 kHz. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were
performed on Thermo Fisher Scientific K-Alpha using an Al Kα
monochromatic source, and the XPS spectra were analyzed by
XPSPEAK Fit 4.1 software. The gaseous components in the ball mill
reactor were analyzed using Hiden-Qic 20 mass spectrometer (MS).
[12] a) A. Almahboob, E. Muller, A. Karim, J. T. Muckerman, C. V. Ciobanu,
P. Sutter, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10381-10384; b) Z. Wang, X.
Guo, M. Wu, Q. Sun, Y. Jia, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 305, 40-45; c) A. Du,
S. C. Smith, X. Yao, G. Q. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10201-
7
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.