Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
(e.g., squaraines, rubrene, and coumarins), without typical
covalent functionalization; 5) selective interactions are found
between mannose-binding proteins (i.e., concanavalin A) and
the clusters with/without fluorescent dyes.
stacked polyaromatic core of (MA)6 is thoroughly coated by
18 mannose-based pendants.
Spectroscopic analyses of (MA)n revealed its moderate
emissivity and relatively high stability against low concen-
tration. The UV/Vis absorption bands of (MA)n in H2O were
slightly red-shifted (Dlmax =+ 5 nm) relative to those of MA
in CH3OH, implying anthracene-based p-stacking interac-
tions (Figure 3a). The emission bands of (MA)n were
Mannose-attached amphiphile MAwas synthesized in two
steps from our bent building block[12] and the quantitative
formation of mannose cluster (MA)n in water was revealed by
NMR, DLS, and AFM analyses. Etherification of 1,5-di(9-
anthryl)-2,3,4-trihydroxybenzene with a tetra-O-acetylman-
nose derivative (39% yield) and subsequent deprotection
(84% yield) gave rise to MA.[13,14] Stirring a suspension of
MA (0.4 mg, 0.4 mmol) in D2O (0.4 mL) at 1008C for 30 min
resulted in a clear, colorless solution including cluster (MA)n.
1
Whereas the H NMR spectrum of MA in CD3OD showed
five sharp aromatic signals and complicated mannose signals
in the ranges of 8.5–6.9 and 4.9–3.0 ppm, respectively, that of
the product in D2O was extremely broadened (Figure 2a,b).
The broad signals sharpen at elevated temperatures (e.g.,
608C, Figure 2c), suggesting that the motion of the polyar-
omatic panels of MA is restricted in the assembled state on
the NMR timescale.[15] The selective formation of well-
defined cluster (MA)n (n = ca. 6) was confirmed by particle
size analyses. The DLS chart of (MA)n in water indicated the
formation of small particles with an average polyaromatic-
core diameter of ca. 2 nm (Figure 2d). The AFM image of
(MA)n on mica displayed the presence of spherical particles
with an average outer shell diameter of 2.6 Æ 0.6 nm (Fig-
ure 2e,f). Molecular modeling studies suggested the dominant
formation of a spherical hexamer of MA (Figure 2g), whose
core and outer diameters (i.e., 1.9 and 3.1 nm) are comparable
to those of the DLS and AFM data, respectively. The partially
Figure 3. a) UV/Vis spectra (r.t., 0.1 mM based on MA) of (MA)n in
H2O and MA in CH3OH and, b) their fluorescence spectra
(lex =366 nm). c) Fluorescence quantum yields (r.t., lex =366 nm) of
MA, AA, and SA in the monomeric (CH3OH, 0.1 mM) and micellar
states (H2O, 0.1 or 1.0 mM based on the monomers).
observed at lmax = 435 nm with apparent red-shifts (Dlmax
=
+ 17 nm) and broadening, as compared with those of MA
(Figure 3b).[16] The fluorescent quantum yields (FF) of (MA)n
and MA were estimated to be 19 and 41%, respectively
(Figure 3c). Notably, the FF of (MA)n is 5- and 19-times
higher than that of analogous micelles (AA)n and (SA)n with
ionic substituents, respectively (Figure 3c).[13] The observed,
enhanced emission of (MA)n most probably stems from
restricted p-stacking interactions between the polyaromatic
panels,[17] owing to the sterically hindered saccharide groups.
The concentration-dependent emission study in water indi-
cated the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of MA being
0.02 mM (Figure S23), which is ca. 50 times smaller than that
of (AA)n.[11] The observed, increased stability of (MA)n
against dilution is derived from the non-repulsive, nonionic
hydrophilic groups.
Emission color and intensity of (MA)n could be altered
upon encapsulation of various water-insoluble fluorescent
dyes, through mainly the hydrophobic effect in water. Such
facile, non-covalent modifications have been rarely demon-
strated with the previous covalent and non-covalent clus-
ters.[9] For instance, red-fluorescent saccharide clusters were
facilely prepared employing hydrophobic squaraine dye Squ
and dicyanomethylenepyran dye DCM. When a mixture of
MA (0.2 mg, 0.2 mmol) and Squ (0.01 equiv) was manually
ground for 1 min, followed by sequential water addition
(2.0 mL), centrifugation, and filtration, a clear aqueous
solution of (MA)n·(Squ)m in pale blue was obtained (Fig-
ure 4a,b).[18] The host–guest structure was confirmed by the
UV/Vis spectrum, where a new absorption band derived from
encapsulated (Squ)m was observed at 684 nm (Figure 4c). The
DLS analysis indicated the selective formation of small
particles with a core diameter of 2.1 nm, implying the
presence of (MA)6·Squ (Figure S28 and S29).
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, 1.0 mM based on MA) of a) MA
in CD3OD and b) (MA)n in D2O at r.t., and c) (MA)n in D2O at 608C.
d) DLS chart (r.t., H2O, 0.1 mM based on MA) of (MA)n. e) AFM
image (r.t., dry, mica) of (MA)n and f) the selected height profiles.
g) An optimized structure of (MA)6.
2
ꢀ 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!