2112 Journal of Natural Products, 2009, Vol. 72, No. 12
Li et al.
Table 2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) Data (δ) for Compounds
6 and 7 (J in Hz)
CH3, 170.6 qC), a ∆14,15 double bond (δH 6.23 s; δC 120.6 CH,
162.3 qC) (Tables 2 and 3), and the absence of the 30-acetyl group
of xyloccensin Y (δH 2.19 s; δC 21.0 CH3, 171.4 qC in xyloccensin
Y). The HMBC correlation from H-12 (δ 4.89 dd, 13.2, 4.0) to the
acetyl carbon at δ 170.6 confirmed the location of the 12-acetyl
group. The existence of the ∆14,15 double bond was corroborated
by HMBC correlations between H-15/C-8, H-15/C-14, H-15/C-16,
H-17/C-14, and H3-18/C-14 (Figure 3). Moreover, the significant
NOE interactions observed in 6 from H-30 to H-2 and H-15, but
not from H-30 to H-5, H-11ꢀ, and H-17, established the 30R-H
and the corresponding 3ꢀ-OH group (Figure 4). Similarly, NOE
interactions from H-3 to Hpro-R-29, but not from H-3 to H-5, helped
to establish this 3R-H and the corresponding 3ꢀ-OAc group. Those
between H-5/H-12ꢀ, H-5/H-17, and H-12ꢀ/H-17 indicated their
mutual cis relationship and ꢀ-orientation (Figure 4). Therefore, the
structure of 6, named granatumin F, was established as shown.
position
6
7
2
3
5
6
11R
11ꢀ
3.07, d (12.4)
5.18, d (12.0)
2.61, br s
6.43, br s
2.23, dd (14.0, 4.0)
1.89, t (14.0)
4.89, dd (13.2, 4.0)
6.23, s
5.04, s
2.53, br s
6.43, br s
2.21a
1.89, t (14.0)
4.84, dd (13.5, 4.0)
6.31, s
12
15
17
5.92, s
5.95, s
18
1.64, s
1.65, s
19
1.37, s
1.41, s
21
22
23
28
7.44, br s
6.55, br s
7.38, br s
0.95, s
7.43, br s
6.55, br s
7.38, br s
0.95, s
Compound 7 had a molecular formula of C33H40O16, established
by HRTOFMS, which suggested the presence of an additional OH
group when compared to the structure of 6. Assignment of this
OH group to C-2 of 7 was corroborated by the downfield chemical
shift of this carbon in 7 (δC 76.0 qC) and HMBC correlations from
H-3 and H-30 to C-2. The relative configuration of 7 was the same
as that of 6, on the basis of NOE interactions between H-5/H-12ꢀ,
H-5/H-17, H-17/H-21, H-15/H3-18, H-21/H3-18, and H-22/H3-18.
Thus, granatumin G (7) was identified as 2-hydroxygranatumin F.
29pro-S
29pro-R
30
7-OMe
3-OAc-2′
6-OAc-2′′
12-OAc-2′′′
2.30, d (10.8)
1.44, d (10.8)
4.42, br s
3.74, s
2.02, s
2.20, s
2.18, d (10.5)
1.68, d (10.5)
4.41, br s
3.74, s
2.06, s
2.21, s
1.55, s
1.55, s
a Overlapped signals assigned by 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC
spectra without designating multiplicity.
The obtained mexicanolides were tested for insecticidal activity
using a conventional leaf disk method against the fifth instar larvae
of Brontispa longissima (Gestro). Khayasin T, previously reported
to have significant insecticidal activity against the leafcutting ants
Atta sexdens rubropilosa,25 exhibited moderate insecticidal activity
at a concentration of 20 mg/L. Its lethal rates against the fifth instar
larvae of B. longissima at exposure times of 48, 72, and 96 h were
17.4%, 27.8%, and 41.5%, respectively. The other compounds were
less active. However, lethal rates of toosendanin at the same
concentrations were 0%, 7.4%, and 7.4%, respectively.
4′/C-3′, H3-4′/C-2′, H3-5′/C-2′, H3-5′/C-1′, and H-2′/C-1′. The
HMBC cross-peak from H-3 [4.90 (d, J ) 9.0 Hz)] to a carbonyl
carbon placed the 2-methylbutyryl group at C-3. The significant
NOE interaction observed in 2, from H-3 to H3-29, but not from
H-3 to H-5, established the 3ꢀ-orientation of the 2-methylbutyryl
group. The absolute configuration at C-2′ in the 2-methylbutyryl
group was determined as S on the basis of the positive specific
rotation of the corresponding acid [[R]25 +16 (c 0.05, Me2CO)],
D
obtained from alkaline hydrolysis of 2.20-22 Thus, granatumin B
(2) was identified as 3-O-2S-methylbutyryl 3-demethacryloylgrana-
tumin A.
Experimental Section
Compound 3 had the molecular formula C32H38O9, as established
by HRTOFMS. The NMR data of 3 were similar to those of
swietemahonolide,13 except for the presence of a ∆14,15 double bond
(δH 6.12 s; δC 118.8 CH, 160.9 qC). The existence of this double
bond was supported by HMBC correlations between H-15/C-8,
H-15/C-13, H-15/C-14, H-15/C-16, and H-30/C-14. Moreover, the
R-orientation of the 8,30-epoxy ring in 3 was confirmed by the
NOE interaction between H-30/H-15. Therefore, granatumin C (3)
was concluded to be 14,15-dedihydroswietemahonolide.
The NMR data of 4 (C32H42O8 by HRTOFMS) were similar to
those of swietemahonolide,13 except for the lack of the 8,30-epoxy
ring [δH 3.22 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz); δC 60.7, 63.4 in swietemahonolide],
which was confirmed by carbon multiplicities observed in the DEPT
experiment. Significant NOE interactions observed in 4 between
H-9/H3-19, H-14/H3-18, and H-8/H-9 established their R-orientation.
Thus, granatumin D (4) was identified as 8,30-deepoxyswietemaho-
nolide.
General Experimental Procedures. Optical rotations were recorded
on a Polaptronic HNQW5 automatic high-resolution polarimeter
(Schmidt & Haensch Co. Ltd.). UV spectra were obtained on a Beckman
DU-640 UV spectrophotometer, and MALDITOFMS spectra were
measured on a Bruker APEX II spectrometer in positive ion mode.
NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 using Bruker AV-400 or AV-
500 spectrometers with TMS as the internal standard. Preparative HPLC
was carried out on ODS columns (250 × 10 mm i.d. and 250 × 4.6
mm i.d.,YMC) with a Waters 2998 photodiode array detector. For CC,
silica gel (200-300 mesh) (Qingdao Mar. Chem. Ind. Co. Ltd.) and
RP C18 gel (Cosmosil C18-PREP 140 µm, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto,
Japan) were used.
Plant Material. The seeds of X. granatum were collected in
September 2007 at the mangrove wetlands in Krishna estuary, Andhra
Pradesh, India. The identification of the plant was performed by one
of the authors (T. S.). A voucher sample (No. IndianXM-02) is
maintained in the Herbarium of the South China Sea Institute of
Oceanology.
Compound 5, a white, amorphous powder, had the molecular
formula C32H40O10. The NMR data of 5 were similar to those of
febrifugin A,14 except for the different γ-hydroxybutenolide group
substituted at C-17. The NMR data of the γ-hydroxybutenolide
group in 5, characterized by two broad proton singlets at δH 6.07/
6.09 (H-21) and 6.20/6.25 (H-22) and by resonances at δC 163.2
(C-20), 97.5/99.3 (C-21), 120.5/122.0 (C-22), and 169.4 (C-23),
were the same as those of kihadanin A.23 The appearance of pairs
of most proton and carbon resonances in the NMR spectra of 5
suggested the presence of C-21 epimers. Thus, the structure of
granatumin E (5) was elucidated as shown.
Extraction and Isolation. Dried seeds (10.0 kg) of X. granatum
were extracted three times with 95% EtOH at room temperature. The
extract was concentrated under reduced pressure, followed by suspen-
sion in H2O and extraction with EtOAc. The resulting EtOAc extract
(328 g) was chromatographed on silica gel and eluted using a
CHCl3-MeOH system (100:0-5:1) to yield 229 fractions. Fractions
63 to 70 (25.0 g) were combined and further purified by RP C18 CC
(MeCN-H2O, 50:50-100:0) to afford 82 subfractions. Subfractions
30 and 31 were combined and subjected to preparative HPLC (YMC-
Pack ODS-5-A, 250 × 20 mm i.d. and 250 × 4.6 mm i.d.,
MeOH-H2O, 50:50 to 55: 45) to yield compounds 1 (3 mg), 2, (5
mg), 3 (3 mg), 4, (3 mg), 5 (2 mg), 6 (3 mg), and 7 (2 mg), khayasin
T10 (4 mg), tigloylseneganolide A11 (4 mg), 6-deoxyswietenine12 (6
mg), swietemahonolide13 (5 mg), febrifugin A14 (2 mg), xylogranati-
nin15 (30 mg), gedunin16 (5 mg), phaseic acid17 (2 mg), (2R,3R)-
Compound 6 had the molecular formula C33H40O15. The NMR
data of 6 were similar to those of xyloccensin Y (C33H42O15),24
except for the presence of a 12-acetyl group (δH 1.55 s; δC 19.9