strictly related to the direct electrosynthesis of substituted
1H-indoles, would be desirable to clarify these reactions.
When a proton donor (phenol or methyl 3-oxobutanoate)
is added to the solution, the cyclic voltammogram changes
dramatically, as shown by curve B of Figure 2. Only one
very broad cathodic peak is seen at ꢀ1.25 V vs SCE, which is
in accord with observations made in our earlier study.12 It is
our belief, as revealed below, that this single, large cathodic
peak arises principally from the overall four-electron con-
version of the o-nitrostyrene (2a) to the desired 2-phenyl-
1H-indole (3a).
Compiled in Table 1 are cathodic and anodic peak
potentials for all five o-nitrostyrenes (2aꢀe) in the absence
of a proton donor as well as cathodic peak potentials for
these compounds in the presence of a 10-fold molar excess of
phenol. Although there are some differences in the various
peak potentials for the five species, the essential interpreta-
tion of their electrochemical behavior is quite comparable. It
is not unexpected that structural modifications for 2bꢀe can
lead to the appearance of a new voltammetric peak or to the
coalescence of two voltammetric peaks.
Table 2. Coulometric Data and Product Yields for the Direct
Reduction of 5.0 mM Solutions of o-Nitrostyrenes at a Retic-
ulated Vitreous Carbon Cathode in DMF Containing 0.050 M
TMABF4 and 50 mM Phenol
electrolysis
potential, Va
yield of
1H-indole
o-nitrostyrene
nb
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2ec
ꢀ1.31
ꢀ1.46
ꢀ1.26
ꢀ1.41
ꢀ1.41
ꢀ1.41
3.92
4.13
4.10
4.20
4.20
4.20
3a (82%)
3b (67%)
3c (57%)
3d (38%)
3e (35%)
3e (65%)
a All potentials are with respect to the saturated calomel electrode
(SCE); see Supporting Information for details about the actual reference
electrode used. b Average number of electrons required to reduce one
molecule of each parent o-nitrostyrene derivative. c Methyl 3-oxobu-
tanoate (50 mM) was used as the proton donor instead of phenol.
hydrogen gas and competing with direct electrolysis of the
chosen o-nitrostyrene.
Table 2 summarizes the coulometric data along with
yields of the 1H-indole derivatives (3aꢀe) for at least
duplicate electrolyses of each o-nitrostyrene; the n values
indicatethe average numberof electronsrequiredtoreduce
each molecule of o-nitrostyrene, and the product yield is
the percentage of the o-nitrostyrene derivative incorpo-
rated into each of the 1H-indoles (as determined by means
of gas chromatography, with a known quantity of an
electroinactive internal standard, n-dodecane, being added
to each solution prior to an electrolysis).19 At the end of
each experiment, none of the starting material remained
unreduced. As revealed in Table 2, an interesting observation
is that the use of methyl 3-oxobutanoate, which is more
acidic than phenol, raised the yield of 3e from 35% to 65%;
in a DMF medium, the pKa values for phenol and methyl
3-oxobutanoate are close to 18.9 and 15.2, respectively.20,21
In preliminary experiments a near doubling of the yield of 3d
has been obtained when phenol is replaced by methyl
3-oxobutanoate. Thus, the use of even more potent proton
donors should be a fruitful avenue for future exploration. We
have begun to explore a larger set of more potent proton
donors, including acetic acid (pKaDMF = 13.4) and benzoic
acid (pKaDMF = 12.1). Changing the proton donor has little
effect on the value of Epc for the single cathodic peak that is
governed essentially by reduction of the nitro group, but we
have not yet assessed whether these better proton donors
affect the yields of 1H-indoles.
Table 1. Cyclic Voltammetric Peak Potentials at 100 mV sꢀ1 for
2.0 mM Solutions of o-Nitrostyrenes at a Glassy Carbon
Electrode in DMF Containing 0.050 M TMABF4
o-nitrostyrene
Epc, Va
Epa, Va
Epcb,Va
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
ꢀ1.27, ꢀ1.59, ꢀ1.79 ꢀ1.51, ꢀ0.99
ꢀ1.25
ꢀ1.45
ꢀ1.18
ꢀ1.33
ꢀ1.30
ꢀ1.54, ꢀ1.78
ꢀ1.42, ꢀ1.25, ꢀ0.87
ꢀ1.14, ꢀ1.54, ꢀ1.70 ꢀ1.37, ꢀ0.91
ꢀ1.25, ꢀ1.64, ꢀ1.74 ꢀ1.38, ꢀ1.04, ꢀ0.84
ꢀ1.29, ꢀ1.41, ꢀ1.68 ꢀ1.38, ꢀ1.08, ꢀ0.82
a Epc values are cathodic peak potentials, and Epa values are anodic
peak potentials with respect to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE);
see Supporting Information for details about the actual reference
electrode used. b 20 mM phenol was added to the solution.
On the basis of previous work done with 1-nitro-2-
vinylbenzene,12 separateroom-temperaturecontrolled-po-
tential (bulk) electrolyses of 5.0 mM solutions of 2aꢀe in
DMF containing 0.050 M TMABF4 and 50.0 mM phenol
were carried out at reticulated vitreous carbon cathodes.
We determined the potential needed for each bulk electrol-
ysis by inspecting a cyclic voltammogram for a 2.0 mM
solution of each compound in DMFꢀ0.050 M TMABF4
containing 20.0 mM phenol. For example, to carry out the
electrolysis of 2a, the potential chosen from curve B of
Figure 2 was ꢀ1.31 V vs SCE (Table 2), which is just
slightly more negative than the value for Epc (ꢀ1.25 V vs
SCE) listed in Table 1. Potentials for the electrochemical
reductions of 2bꢀe weresimilarlyselected, asacomparison
of data in Tables 1 and 2 reveals. Choosing a potential
more positive than Epc will prolong the electrolysis (and
may lead to extraneous products), whereas a potential
that is significantly more negative than Epc will induce
the formation of products (e.g., amines) that are more
extensively reduced than the desired 1H-indoles. More-
over, at more negative potentials, it is possible that the
proton donor itself will undergo some reduction, forming
It should be noted that the coulometric n values reported
in Table 2 are essentially 4, an observation in accord with
7
the postulate, as articulated by Soderberg, that a nitrene
€
intermediate might be involved in the reductive conversion
of o-nitrostyrenes to 1H-indoles. Finally, 3b is difficult to
isolate in pure form, as discussed in the Supporting
Information.
(19) Pritts, W. A.; Vieira, K. L.; Peters, D. G. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65,
2145–2149.
(20) Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456–463.
(21) Maran, F.; Celadon, D.; Severin, M. G.; Vianello, E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9320–9329.
4074
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 15, 2011