84
N.W. Smith et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 157 (2010) 83–87
2.4. Gel preparation for the conductivity measurements
The gel electrolytes were formed by mixing organogelator A,
DMSO, and ionic liquid in a vial followed by heating with a heat gun
until a homogeneous solution was obtained. The mixture was
transferred into the cell by syringe while hot followed by the insertion
of the electrodes. The measurement was performed after the gel was
formed.
Fig. 1. Structures of ionic liquid 1 and organogelator A.
2.5. Tgel measurements
[Bn−mim]BF4, 2: [10] 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO−d6) δ=9.18
Tgel were determined using test-tube-tilting method: [16] a vial
containing the gel was inversely (or horizontally, i.e., on its side)
immersed into a water-bath and the temperature was raised at 1 °C/
min. The Tgel was recorded as the temperature when the gelled mass
started to flow downward.
(1H, s), 7.77 (1H, t, J=1.8 Hz), 7.70 (1H, t, J=1.8 Hz), 5.40 (2H, s), 3.84
(3H, s).
[HO(CH2)2−mim]BF4, 3: [11] 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO−d6)
δ=9.04 (1H, s), 7.69 (1H, t, J=1.8 Hz), 7.65 (1H, t, J=1.8 Hz), 5.14
(1H, s), 4.19 (2H, t, J=4.8 Hz), 3.84 (3H, s), 3.70 (2H, m).
[C12−mim]BF4, 1: [9b] 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO−d6) δ=9.06
(1H, s), 7.73 (1H, t, J=1.8 Hz), 7.67 (1H, t, J=1.8 Hz), 4.13 (2H, t,
J=7.5 Hz), 3.83 (3H, s), 1.75 (2H, m), 1.22 (18H, m), 0.84 (3H, t,
J=6.6 Hz).
[C4−py]BF4, 5: [12] 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO−d6) δ=9.06 (2H,
d, J=5.6 Hz), 8.59 (1H, d, J=7.9 Hz), 8.14 (2H, t, J=6.9 Hz), 4.59 (2H,
t, J=7.7 Hz), 1.88 (2H, pent, J=7.7 Hz), 1.27 (2H, six, J=7.7 Hz), 0.89
(3H, t, J=7.2 Hz).
[Bn−py]BF4, 6: [12] 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ=9.64 (2H, d,
J=5.6 Hz), 8.43 (1H, t, J=7.9 Hz), 8.01 (2H, t, J=6.7 Hz), 7.68 (2H,
m), 7.31 (3H, m), 6.30 (2H, 1 s).
[HO(CH2)2−py]BF4, 7: [13] 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO−d6)
δ=8.99 (2H, d, J=5.4 Hz), 8.60 (1H, tt, J=7.5, 0.9 Hz), 8.15 (2H, t,
J=6.6 Hz), 5.20 (1H, s), 4.64 (2H, t, J=5.1 Hz), 3.84 (2H, t, J=5.1 Hz).
3. Results and discussion
A was reported to gelate a variety of molecular solvents [7]. 10 mg/ml
is a minimum gelator concentration for A to gel DMSO [7]. In order to test
the ability of [C4−mim]BF4 to assist in the gelation of DMSO, we prepared
a 2 mg/ml solution of A in DMSO and, as expected, no gelation of DMSO
was observed. However, upon addition of [C4−mim]BF4 (20% v/v) an
instantaneous formation of a stable transparent gel occurred at room
temperature. The gel formation was thermoreversible. We then examined
whether 1, which contained 2 mg/ml of A, could be gelled by the addition
of various amounts of DMSO. However, no gelation was observed when
DMSO was added to the solution of Ain 1. In this case the dissolution of the
ionic liquid into DMSO took place, leading to the precipitation of A. The gel
formation of the obtained heterogenoues mixture was only observed
upon subjecting it to a heating/cooling procedure, i.e., the vial was heated
with the heat gun until a homogeneous mixture was obtained and then
allowed to cool to room temperature. The gel formation was observed
visually by the inverse tube method.
In order to gain an insight into the role of 1 in the gelation process,
we probed 1-DMSO-A interactions using NMR spectroscopy, using
DMSO−d6 in place of DMSO. Chemical shifts of ionic liquids are
known to be environment and concentration dependent [17].
Therefore, if the ionic liquid is trapped within the gel, one would
expect the chemical shifts to be distinct from those observed in the
solution. Our experiments revealed that all chemical shifts of 1 (both
1H and 19F nuclei resonances) were identical in the gel state and in the
DMSO solution, i.e., in the presence and absence of A, respectively.
These experiments indicated that the ionic liquid is neither a part of
the gel network nor does it undergoes any aggregation processes
upon gelation. Due to low gelator concentration, it was not possible to
estimate the behavior of A in neither solution nor the gel states.
Collectively, the observations presented above indicated that the ionic
[C12−py]BF4, 8: [14] 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ=8.54 (2H, d,
J=5.8 Hz), 8.48 (1H, t, J=8.0 Hz), 8.05 (2H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 4.64 (2H, t,
J=7.4 Hz), 2.00 (2H, m), 1.24 (18H, m), 0.87 (3H, t, J=6.6 Hz).
2.3. Conductivity measurements
The specific conductance values were obtained by the direct
current four-electrode method using a custom-made glass cell (Fig. 2)
and Ag-electrodes at 25.00 0.01 °C. The measurements were
performed using: Hewlett Packard 34401A multimeter (Estd), Keithley
182 sensitive digital voltmeter (Ecell), AMEL instructions general
purpose potentiostat model 2049 (constant current source) and
Leed&Northrup 1000 Ohm D–C resistance standard (Rstd). The
conductance cell was calibrated using KCl solutions, according to
literature procedures [15].
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ionic liquids.