Molecules 2020, 25, 3392
7 of 11
3
.1. (R)-1,2-O-Isopropylidene-3,5-O-Sulfinyl-α-d-Glucofuranose (R)-4 [28]
-O-tert-Butyldimethylsilyl-1,2-O-isopropylidene- -d-glucofuranose (3.4 g, 10 mmol) in pyridine
6
α
(
0
10 mL) was treated with freshly distilled thionyl chloride (0.87 mL, 12 mmol). The mixture was kept at
C, and after disappearance of the substrate (24 h) the mixture was poured into water and extracted
◦
with DMC. The extract was dried over MgSO , concentrated in vacuo and separated on silica gel
4
◦
column using n-hexane-diethyl ether (9:1) as an eluent to give (R)-
] = +48.0 (c = 1.4 CH Cl ), H NMR (CDCl ):
4
(1.5 g, 45%), m.p. = 54–56 C,
1
[α
δ
= 6.01 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz, H-1); 4.94 (d, 1H, J = 2.6 Hz,
D
2
2
3
H-3); 4.68 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz, H-2); 4.46 (t, 1H, J = 2.6, 5.5 Hz, H-4); 4.30 (m, 1H, J = 4.8, 5.5, 8.0 Hz, H-5);
4
.12 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0, 10.8 Hz, H-6); 3.93 (dd, 1H, J = 4.8, 10,8 Hz, H-6); 1.50, 1.35 (2s, 6H, 2
×
CH ); 0.89
3
(s, 9H, t-Bu); 0.08 (s, 6H, 2×CH3).
3
.2. (S)-1,2-O-Isopropylidene-(5-O-α-d-glucofuranosyl) t-Butanesulfinate (-)-(S)-10
1 mmol, 0.226 g) of (R)-
◦
(
4
in 10 mL of a solvent (THF, Et O or benzene) was cooled to 0 C and
2
treated with excess of t-butylmagnesium chloride (3 mmol). The progress of the reaction was monitored
with TLC. After 4 h for Et O and THF as the solvents (and 6 h for benzene as a solvent), the mixture was
2
worked up with 10 mL of saturated ammonium chloride and extracted 3 times with DCM (3
Combined extracts were dried over magnesium sulfate and evaporated. Separated on silica gel column
using DCM: Et O 1:1 as an eluent gave desired product 10: 0.291 g (90% for Et O as a solvent), 0.285 g
×
10 mL).
2
2
◦
(
(
(
88% for THF as a solvent), and 0.275 g (85% for benzene as a solvent). M.p. = 60–62 C, [
α
] = 57.8
−
D
1
c = 1.0 DCM). H NMR (CDCl ):
δ = 5.95 (d, 1H, J = 3.5 Hz, H-1); 4.56 (d, 1H, J = 3.5 Hz, H-3); 4.41
3
d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, H-2); 4.38 (s, 1H, OH); 4.35 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, H-4); 4.21 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 9.7 Hz,
H-5); 4.17 (d.d, 1H, J = 2.4, 7.3 Hz, H-6); 4.06 (dd, 1H, J = 3.4, 8.7 Hz, H-6); 3.99 (d, 1H, J = 3.5 Hz, H-5);
.55, 1.62 (br, s, 1H, OH); 1.50 (s, 3H, OCH ); 1.31 (s, 3H, OCH ); 1.23 (s, 9H, t-Bu). Anal. Calcd. for
1
3
3
C H O S: C, 48.15; H, 7.41; S, 9.87. Found: C, 48.41; H, 7.23; S, 9.99.
13
24
7
3
.3. t-Butyl Methyl Sulfoxide (+)-(R)-11
A solution of (-)-(S)-10 (0,162 g, 0.5 mmol) in 10 mL of diethyl ether was added dropwise to an
etheral solution of methylmagnesium iodide (1 mmol/10 mL) at room temperature. After completion
of the addition, the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The reaction was then
quenched with 10 mL saturated ammonium chloride solution. After being stirred for a while, the layers
were separated and the ether phase was extracted twice with water (2
phases, after saturation with sodium chloride, were extracted with dichloromethane (4
The organic solution was dried over magnesium sulfate and evaporated. A crude product was purified
×
10 mL). The combined water
10 mL).
×
on a silica gel column using dichloromethane - ethyl ether (2:1) as eluent affording (-)-(R)-t-butyl
1
methyl sulfoxide 11 (54 mg, 90%) [
1
α
] =
D
−
4.2 (c = 1.0, acetone), 99% e.e.; H NMR (CDCl ): 2.28 (s, 3H);
3
.15 (s, 9H). These data are fully consistent with the literature data [25,28].
3
.4. Reaction of (R)-1,2-O-Isopropylidene-3,5-O-Sulfinyl- α-d-Glucofuranose (+)-(R)-4 with
Phenylmagnesium Bromide
◦
A solution of (+)-(R)-4 (0.133 g, 0.5 mmol) in of THF (5 mL) was cooled to 0 C and treated with
a solution of freshly prepared phenylmagnesium bromide (1.5 mmol) in THF (10 mL). The progress
of the reaction was monitored with TLC and after disappearance of the substrate (1.5 h) the
mixture was treated with aqueous, saturated ammonium chloride solution (7 mL) and extracted
with chloroform (4
×
10 mL). The combined organic phase was dried over magnesium sulfate and
evaporated. The residue was separated on a silica gel column using DCM: ethyl acetate 2:1 and, finally,
with ethyl acetate as eluents for diphenyl sulfoxide 9b (88 mg, 89%) m.p. 69–71 C; H NMR (CDCl ):
◦
1
3
δ
= 7.22–7.36 (m, 6H), 7.47–7.62 (m, 4H) (these data are in accordance with literature data [35
and 1,2-O-isopropylidene- -d-glucofuranose 13 (71 mg, 65% [ ] = 11.2 (c = 1.2, H O- this value
is in accordance with literature data [38]). Substrate (+)-(R)-
–37])
α
α
−
D
2
4
was not detected. A similar reaction