J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 57, Nº 4 (2012)
One of the most interesting products in the hydrogenation of substrates
is (R)-1-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-2-one, from PPD. This compound is
commonly known as L-PAC and its importance become because it acts as a
key intermediate of various compounds used for treatment of hypotension,
nasal decongestants and asthma40. It production was preferencial with respect
to others products of PPD hydrogenation. During the formation of a new pair of
enantiomers in minor amount, the ee values vary reached a maximum of 53%
at 420 minutes of reaction.
An unmodified catalyst, 1% Rh/SiO2, obtained in similar conditions but
without (-)-DIOP as stabilizer, was also prepared as comparison with 1.0Rh-
3L. Average particles size of this catalyst was higher as consequence of it was
prepare in absence of the stabilizer ligand and therefore the growing of the metal
particle is higher. Additionally, the lack of chiral surface leads to the racemic
mixture. These catalytic tests were performed only on the hydrogenation in
similar conditions of PPD substrate.
Figure 7 shows the reactant consumption and the formation of products
in PPD hydrogenation. It can be observed as the diketone is converted, the
hydrogenation of both carbonyl bonds may occurs, however, is favoured the
hydrogenation of carbonyl group closer to the aromatic ring. After 100 min of
reaction the slight formation of (S) and (R)-2-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-1-one
was observed, but in lower extent.
CONCLUSIONS
The hydrogenation of prochiral substrates at 40 bar and 298 K was studied
on different Rh chiral catalysts. The obtained results indicate that catalysts
synthesized under mild conditions allow to obtain active and selective NPs
on SiO in asymmetric hydrogenation, without further treatment, because the
surface2contains chirally modified metal sites.
The variation of metal loading in the catalysts allows a slight change in
catalytic activity, and it was also found that the concentration of chiral ligand
added in the synthesis of Rh NPs significantly affects the metal size and the
enantioselectivity of each system in particular.
The reuse of catalyst shows high activity and enantioselectivity in a first
recycle decreasing slightly with increasing the amount of recycling. These
changes are explained in terms of small leaching of metal NPs.
REFERENCES
1. B.D. Vineyard, W.S. Knowles, M.J. Sabacky, G.L. Bachman, D.J.
Weinkauff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 5946, (1977).
2. R.A. Sheldon, Chirotechnology. Industrial Synthesis of Optically Active
Compounds, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1993; pp. 173204.
3. A.N. Collins, G.N. Sheldrake, J. Crosby. Chirality in Industry. Vol I, Vol
II, Jhon Wiley, Chichester, 1992 and 1997.
4. S.A. Matlin, W.J. Lough, L. Chan, D.M.H. Abram, Z. Zhou, J. Chem.
Commun. 1038 (1994).
5. D. Ruiz, P. Reyes, J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 53, 1740, (2008).
6. D. De Vos, I Vankelecom, P. Jacobs. Chiral Catalysis Immobilization and
Recicling, Wiley-VCH, 2000; p.1-41, 211.
Figure 7. Evolution of the PPD hydrogenation on time. Reaction
conditions: 0.02 mol×L-1 of substrate, 100 mg of 1.0Rh-3L catalyst, 40 bar of
H2 and 298 K in cyclohexane as solvent.
7. A. Roucoux, J. Schulz, H. Patin, Chem. Rev. 102, 3757, (2002).
8. M. A. El-Sayed, Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 257, (2001).
One of the most important advantages of heterogeneous catalysis is that
the catalyst recycling is easier. In this work, 1.0Rh-3L catalysts were used
in consecutive cycles of PPD hydrogenation without addition of extra chiral
inducer.
Catalytic results in the reaction of PPD indicate a decrease in activity by
reusing the 1.0Rh-3L catalyst, however, the conversion reaches high values up
to 41% and 37% of enantioselectivity at 420 min of reaction until cycle N° 4
compared to 72 y 53% initial respectively. Table 4 summarizes the obtained
results of recycling on PPD and in figure 8 it can also be seen that chiral catalyst
shows a deactivation in the successive cycles but with rather slight changes
in the enantioselectivity. These changes in activity and enantioselectivity are
attributed to small leaching of metal NPs along the cycles.
9. J. A. Widegren, R. G. Finke, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 191, 187, (2003).
10. J. D. Aiken, R. G. Finke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 8803, (1999).
11. H. Bönnemann, G. A. Braun, J. Chem. Eur. 3, 1200, (1997).
12. J. Dupont, G. S. Fonseca, A. P. Umpierre, P. F. P. Fichtner, S. R. Teixeira,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 4228, (2002).
13. J. U. Kohler, J. S. Bradley, Langmuir. 14, 2730, (1998).
14. H. Bönnemann, G. A. Braun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 35, 1992, (1996).
15. M. Studer, H. U. Blaser, C. Exner, Adv. Synth. Catal. 345, 45, (2003).
16. X. B. Zuo, H. F. Liu, D. W. Guo, X. Z. Yang, Tetrahedron. 55, 7787,
(1999).
17. S. Jansat, M. Gomez, K. Philippot, G. Muller, E. Guiu, C. Claver, S.
Castillon, B. Chaudret, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1592, (2004).
18. S. Castillon, C. Claver, Y. Diaz, Chem. Soc. Rev. 34, 702, (2005).
19. M. Dieguez, O. Pamies, C. Claver, Chem. Rev. 104, 3189, (2004).
20. M. Dieguez, O. Pamies, A. Ruiz, Y. Diaz, S. Castillon, C. Claver, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 248, 2165, (2004).
21. M. Aghmiz, A. Aghmiz, Y. Diaz, A. Masdeu-Bulto, C. Claver, S. Castillon,
J. Org.Chem. 69, 7502, (2004).
22. K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, C. R. Chimie. 6, 1019, (2003).
23. B. Chaudret, C. R. Physique. 6, 117, (2005).
24. J. S. Bradley, E. W. Hill, S. Behal, C. Klein, B. Chaudret, A. Duteil, Chem.
Mater. 4, 1234, (1992).
25. D. Zitoun, M. Respaud, M. C. Fromen, M. J. Casanove, P. Lecante, C.
Amiens, B. Chaudret, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 37203, (2002).
26. M. Axet, S. Castillón,C. Claver, K. Philippot, P. Lecante,, B. Chaudret,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 22, 3460, (2008).
27. A. Gual, M. R. Axet, K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, A. Denicourt-Nowicki, A.
Roucoux, S. Castillón, C. Claver, Chem. Commun. 2759, (2008).
28. I. Favier, M. Gómez, G. Muller, M. R. Axet, S. Castillón, C. Claver, S.
Jansat, B. Chaudret, K. Philippot, Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 2459, (2007).
29. A. Gual, C. Godard, K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, A. Denicourt-Nowicki, A.
Roucoux, S. Castillón, C. Claver, Chem. Sus. Chem. 2, 769, (2009).
30. H. Bönnemann, R. M. Richards, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 10, 2455, (2001).
31. D. Han, X. Li, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Li, C. Li, J. Catal. 243, 318, (2006).
32. D. Han, X. Li b, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, G. Hu, Can Li, J. Mol. Cat A: Chem.
Figure 8. Recycles of 1.0Rh-3L catalyst. Conversion of PPD and ee of
(R)-1-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-2-one. Reactions conditions: 0.02 mol×L-1 of
PPD over 100 mg of 1.0Rh-3L catalyst in cyclohexane at 298 K and 40 bar
of H2.
1398