Photophysical Properties of 1,4-Bis(phenylethynyl)benzene
A R T I C L E S
Chart 1. Compounds 1 and 2
isomers of 1, i.e., a planar structure and a twisted form. If true,
this observation would have profound implications for the
behavior of these materials in a range of applications, as well
as being an example of very unusual photophysical behavior.
We had not previously observed such anomalous behavior
in several closely related systems,6 and Grummt and colleagues
have claimed the fluorescence spectrum of 1 is wavelength
independent.7j Furthermore, neither we nor Grummt’s group had
seen the unusual low-energy shoulder (λmax ) 360 nm) on the
UV-vis profile of 1 reported by Levitus et al.14 This prompted
us to reexamine carefully the spectroscopic properties of 1 in
solution.
In terms of measurements concerned with the dynamic
processes of materials based upon the core framework of 1,
Sluch et al. have undertaken picosecond time-resolved emission
studies of a substituted nonamer 2 (Chart 1).12 Their results are
consistent with a thermally populated distribution of ground-
state conformations and a first excited state with a considerably
larger barrier to rotational distortion from the lowest energy
planar orientation. The viscosity of the solvent medium was
also shown to play a significant role in the dynamic process,
with high-viscosity solvents hindering the relative torsional
motion of the aryl groups. Similar models have been proposed13
to account for the photophysical properties of 1,4-bis(anthra-
cenyl-9-ethynyl)benzene6c and 1,4-bis(phenylethynyl)anthra-
cene.6c,7a-c
We were greatly intrigued by a recent report of a series of
photophysical measurements of the parent species 1,4-bis-
(phenylethynyl)benzene (1).14 This report described the observa-
tion of significant and systematic shifts in the fluorescence
emission spectrum of 1 with excitation wavelength. The
observation of two discrete spectral profiles, rather than a smooth
transition from one spectral profile, clearly indicated the
presence of two, spectroscopically distinct species in solution.
These species were attributed to two discrete configurational
2. Experimental Section
A sample of 1 was prepared by Sonogashira coupling of 1,4-
diiodobenzene with phenylacetylene in diisopropylamine with a mixed
Pd(PPh3)4 (3%)/CuI (3%) catalyst.15 The product was purified by
recrystallization from toluene, yielding analytically pure material as
determined by elemental analysis (C22H14 requires C 94.97%, H 5.03%;
1
found C 94.59% H 4.99%), H and 13C NMR, and GC-MS. UV-vis
spectra were recorded with an ATI Unicam UV-2 spectrophotometer.
Samples were held in silica cells with path lengths of 1, 2, 10, and 25
mm and the spectra recorded over the range 200-400 nm with a 1 nm
data interval and a 2 nm band-pass. Fluorescence spectra were recorded
with a Jobin-Yvon Horiba Fluorolog 3-22 Tau-3 spectrofluorimeter.
The spectra of dilute solutions, with an absorbance of <0.1 in the range
250-400 nm, were recorded by using conventional 90° geometry, and
a front-face geometry was used to study highly absorbing solutions.
Both the excitation and emission spectra were fully corrected by using
the manufacturers correction curves for the spectral response of the
excitation and emission optical components. A spectral band-pass of
2.5 nm was used for both the excitation and emission monochromators.
Excitation and emission matrices were acquired by recording the
emission spectra over the range 300-500 nm and stepping the excitation
wavelength from 230 to 400 nm in 2.5 nm increments. Fluorescence
lifetimes were recorded with the same spectrometer operating in the
phase-modulation mode. The phase shift and modulation were recorded
over the frequency range 50-300 MHz, and the data fitted using the
Jobin-Yvon software package. Low-temperature spectra were recorded
in an Oxford Instruments DN1704 cryostat and temperature controller
(ITC 6). A mixture of diethyl ether, 2-methylbutane, and ethanol in
the ratio 5:5:2 (v/v), EPA, was used for the low-temperature studies
since this forms an optically transparent glass at low temperatures.
(7) For a selection of recent references see: (a) Piskunov, A. V.; Moroz, A.
A.; Shvartsberg, M. S. IzV. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1990, 1441-
1443. (b) Nakatsuji, S.; Akiyama, S.; Nakatsuji, S.; Nomura, K.; Matsuda,
K.; Nakashima, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991, 948. (c) Matsuda,
K.; Uesugi, Y.; Nakashima, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1992, 755.
(d) Jones, L., II; Schumm, J. S.; Tour, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1388.
(e) Li, H.; Powell, D. R.; Firman, T. K.; West, R. Macromolecules 1998,
31, 1093-1098. (f) Lahiri, S.; Thompson, J. L.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 11315-11319. (g) Dirk, S. M.; Price, D. W.; Chanteau,
S.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Tour, J. M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 5109-5121. (h)
Tour, J. M.; Rawlett, A. M.; Kozaki, M.; Yao, Y. X.; Jagessar, R. C.; Dirk,
S. M.; Price, D. W.; Reed, M. A.; Zhou, C. W.; Chen, J.; Wang, W. Y.;
Campbell, I. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5118-5134. (i) Kawai, T.; Saski, T.;
Irie, M. Chem. Commun. 2001, 711. (j) Birckner, E.; Grummt, U.-W.;
Go¨ller, A. H.; Pautszch, T.; Egbe, D. A. M.; Al-Higari, M.; Klemm, E. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 10307. (k) Tan, C.; Pinto, M. R.; Schanze, K.
S. Chem. Commun. 2002, 446-447.
(8) (a) Abramenkov, A. V.; Almenningen, A.; Cyvin, B. N.; Cyvin, S. J.;
Jonvik, T.; Khaikin, L. S.; Romming, C.; Vilkonv, L. V. Acta Chim. Scand.
1988, A42, 674-84. (b) Inoue, K.; Takeuchi, H.; Konaka, S. J. Chem. Phys.
A 2001, 105, 6711-16. (c) Okuyama, K.; Hasegawa, T.; Ito, M.; Mikami,
N. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 1711-1716.
(9) Kim, J.; Swager, T. M. Nature 2001, 411, 1030-34.
(10) Reinerth, W. A.; Jones, L., II; Burgin, T. P.; Zhou, C.; Muller, C. J.;
Deshpande, M. R.; Reed, M. A.; Tour, J. M. Nanotechnology 1998, 9, 246-
250.
(11) (a) McFarland, S. A.; Finney, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1178.
(b) Crisp, G. T.; Bubner, T. P. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 11881-11898.
(12) Sluch, M. I.; Godt, G.; Bunz, U. H. F.; Berg, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 6447.
(13) (a) Cherkasov, A. S.; Veselova, B. M.; Krasovitskii, B. M.; Shershukov,
V. M. Opt. Spectrosc. (USSR) 1985, 59, 59-63. (b) Levitus, M.; Garica-
Garibay, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 8632-8637. (c) Schmieder,
K.; Levitus, M.; Dang, H.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002,
106, 1551-1556.
(14) Levitus, M.; Schmieder, K.; Ricks, H.; Shimizu, K. D.; Bunz, U. H. F.;
Garcia-Gariby, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4259-4265.
3. Results and Discussion
In cyclohexane solution, the UV-vis spectrum of 1 prepared
in this manner is consistent with that published earlier by one
of us,6e featuring a series of partially resolved absorption bands
between 250 and 350 nm, with a sharp band-edge at the red
end of the absorption profile (Figure 1). Similar spectra were
observed in toluene, acetonitrile, and dioxane solutions.6e,7j,16
A maximum extinction coefficient of 58 000 ( 1 000 mol-1
dm3 cm-1 was determined at the 320 nm peak. The same
spectral profile was obtained at concentrations from 10-6 to 2.5
× 10-4 mol dm-3 in cyclohexane, with a linear dependence of
the absorption upon concentration (Figure 1). The linear nature
of the Beer-Lambert plot suggests that concentration-dependent
aggregation phenomena are not significant in this solvent.
(15) A minor modification of the procedure described in ref 6a was employed,
as detailed in the Supporting Information.
(16) Beeby, A.; Low, P. J.; Marder, T. B.; Nyugen, P.; Dai, C. Unpublished
work.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 28, 2002 8281