Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
Table 2 Comparison of the production rates on a catalyst weight basis.
(II)). These two reaction pathways
agree with those reported previously
(the competitive oxidation11 and the
electrochemical deprotonation23). The
more the cell was anodically polarized,
the more the production of C2H4 was
promoted (Figs. 2a and 3a). This
indicates that the competitive oxidation
to C2H4 and the deprotonation of C2H6
are dominant under highly-polarized
conditions. Thus, in order to suppress
the by-production of C2H4 and to
synthesize the oxygenates selectively at
the intermediate temperature, it is
DOI: 10.1039/D0CC05111J
Production rate
[μmol g-cat-1 s-1]
Temperature
[oC]
Applied current
[mA]
Catalyst
Oxidant
Ref.
C2H4
0
C2H5OH CH3CHO
80 [a]
Nafion-H
Pt
O2
40
0.26
0.54
14
79 [c]
160 [d]
2.8
5.2
0
1.2
16
This
220 [a]
H2O
0.42
work
475 [a]
50 [b]
Au
O2
H2O2
N2O
O2
5.3
0
-
0
0.16
-
15
10
11
12
13
H-LTA-Pt [e]
FePO4
-
-
-
-
0.0097
400 [b]
550 [b]
650 [b]
1.4
0.26
0.50
0.23
0.47
0.84
0.039
preferable
to
operate
the
B/BPO4
-
-
electrochemical cell under moderate
polarization.
V2O5/O-dia [f]
CO2
Table 2 compares the production
rates of the C2 species (C2H4, C2H5OH
[a] Electrochemically. [b] Thermal catalytically. [c] 30% steam condition applying 100 mA cm-2. [d] 40%
steam condition applying 10 V. [e] Pt containing LTA zeolite. [f] V2O5 supported on oxidized diamond.
and CH3CHO) using various catalysts in
thermal catalytic systems and in
5
6
7
N. Mimura, M. Okamoto, H. Yamashita, S. T. Oyama, K.
Murata, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 21764-21770.
Y. Honda, A. Takagaki, R. Kikuchi, S. T. Oyama, Chem. Lett.,
2018, 47, 1090-1093.
D. J. Xiao, E. D. Bloch, J. A. Mason, W. L. Queen, M. R. Hudson,
N. Planas, J. Borycz, A. L. Dzubak, P. Verma, K. Lee, F. Bonino,
V. Crocellà, J. Yano, S. Bordiga, D. G. Truhlar, L. Gagliardi, C. M.
Brown, J. R. Long, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 590-595.
R. Jin, M. Peng, A. Li, Y. Deng, Z. Jia, F. Huang, Y. Ling, F. Yang,
H. Fu, J. Xie, X. Han, D. Xiao, Z. Jiang, H. Liu, D. Ma, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 18921-18925.
electrochemical systems. On a catalyst weight basis, the
Pt/C|CsH2PO4/SiP2O7|Pt/C electrolysis cell operated at 220oC
gave much higher production rates of the oxygenates and
ethylene than those in the other studies. The production rates
of other products are summarized as well in Table S6.
8
9
Conclusions
The partial oxidation of ethane was carried out using a
phosphate-based electrolyte and Pt/C electrodes at 220oC. The
ethane conversion and the selectivity to acetaldehyde and
ethanol increased under anodically polarized conditions. It was
confirmed that the C2 species were produced electrochemically
from ethane on the Pt/C electrode. Moreover, it was found that
the O species generated by water electrolysis functioned as an
effective oxidant for the synthesis of the oxygenates. This
report offers for the first time the possibility of ethane
conversion to oxygenates at intermediate temperatures using
the phosphate-based electrolyte and the electrochemically-
generated oxidants.
J. G. Vitillo, A. Bhan, C. J. Cramer, C. C. Lu, L. Gagliardi, ACS
Catal. 2019, 9, 2870-2879.
10 B. Liu, S. C. Oh, H. Chen, D. Liu, J. Energy Chem., 2019, 30, 42-
48.
11 Y. Wang, K. Otsuka, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1995, 91,
3953-3961.
12 Y. Uragami, K. Otsuka, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1992, 88,
3605-3610.
13 K. Okumura, K. Nakagawa, T. Shimamura, N. Ikenaga, M.
Nishitani-Gamo, T. Ando, T. Kobayashi, T. Suzuki, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2003, 107, 13419-13424.
14 F. Frusteri, E. N. Savinov, A. Parmaliana, E. R. Savinova, V. N.
Parmon, N. Giordano, Catal. Lett., 1994, 27, 355-360.
15 S. Hamakawa, K. Sato, T. Hayakawa, A. P. E. York, T. Tsunoda,
K. Suzuki, M. Shimizu, K. Takehira, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997,
144, 1-5.
16 Y. Song, L. Lin, W. Feng, X. Zhang, Q. Dong, X. Li, H. Lv, Q. Liu,
F. Yang, Z. Liu, G. Wang, X. Bao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019,
58, 16043-16046.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
17 S. Yoshimi, T. Matsui, R. Kikuchi, K. Eguchi, J. Power. Sources.,
2008, 179, 497-503.
18 G. Qing, K. Sukegawa, R. Kikuchi, A. Takagaki, S. T. Oyama, J.
Appl. Electrochem., 2017, 47, 803-814.
19 R. Kikuchi, A. Ogawa, T. Matsuoka, A. Takagaki, T. Sugawara,
S. T. Oyama, Solid State Ion., 2016, 285, 160-164.
20 S. M. Haile, C. R. I. Chisholm, K. Sasaki, D. A. Boysen, T. Uda,
Faraday Discuss., 2007, 134, 17-39.
21 S. Kishira, G. Qing, S. Suzu, R. Kikuchi, A. Takagaki, S. T. Oyama,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy., 2017, 42, 26843-26854.
22 G. Qing, R. Kikuchi, S. Kishira, A. Takagaki, T. Sugawara, S. T.
Oyama, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2016, 163, E282-E287.
23 S. Liu, K. T. Chuang, J. L. Luo, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 760-768.
References
1
2
3
A. S. Bodke, D. A. Olschki, L. D. Schmidt, E. Ranzi, Science,
1999, 285, 712-715.
C. T. Au, K. D. Chen, H. X. Dai, Y. W. Liu, C. F. Ng, Appl. Catal.
A-Gen., 1999, 177, 185-191.
D. Melzer, G. Mestl, K. Wanninger, Y. Zhu, N. D. Browning, M.
Sanchez-Sanchez, J. A. Lercher, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10,
4012.
4
P. Sun, G. Siddiqi, W. C. Vining, M. Chi, A. T. Bell, J. Catal.,
2011, 282, 165-174.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins