M. Frezza et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 1428–1431
1431
scans) for 10 h at room temperature. The proportion of
each compound, (S)-8, 3, and DPD, was determined on
the basis of integration of the signals (in D2O) corre-
sponding to the 2 diastereotopic H of the methylene group
(C-5) at 4.24 and 4.44 ppm for (S)-8 and at 4.14 ppm for3
or to the hemiketalic methyl groups (2 diasteroisomers) at
1.39 and 1.42 ppm for DPD. The precision for integration
measurements is about 5%. At low concentrations of DPD
(ca. 10%) no accurate values can be given by this method
because the intensity of DPD signals is weak due to its
equilibrium between three species.
applications. Also, this work opens new perspectives for
the development of prodrug type derivatives as quorum
sensing modulators.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the MENESR and
CNRS. M.F. thanks the MENESR for a scholarship.
Authors thank Dr B. Bassler for very kindly providing
V. harveyi BB170 and MM30 as well as Salmonella
typhimurium MET 844 strains.
12. Tamm, C. Pure Appl. Chem. 1992, 64, 1187.
13. Kinetic data showed that the hydrolysis of the 4-OAc
group of 8 to give3 is first-order with respect to 8
(k1 = 0.029 minꢀ1). The hydrolysis of the 5-OAc group of
3 giving rise to DPD appeared also to be first-order with
respect to 3. From these series first-order reaction,14 the
corresponding rate constant k2 was found to be about
0.0021 minꢀ1. In the presence of PLE (EC 3.1.1.1, 19 U/
mg, 10 mg), a similar treatment of kinetic data of Fig. 3a
and b allowed us to estimate the corresponding first-order
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
constants: k01 ꢁ 0:045 minꢀ1; k02 ꢁ 0:0047 minꢀ1
.
14. Moore, J. W.; Pearson, R. G. In Kinetics and Mechanism;
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1981; p 290.
References and notes
15. Taga, M. E.; Miller, S. T.; Bassler, B. L. Mol. Microbiol.
2003, 50, 1411.
1. For recent reviews (a) Miller, M. B.; Bassler, B. L. Annu.
Rev. Microbiol. 2001, 55, 165; (b) Whitehead, N. A.;
Barnard, A. M.; Slater, H.; Simpson, N. J.; Salmond, G.
P. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 25, 365; (c) Lyon, G. J.;
Muir, T. W. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 1007; (d) Waters, C. M.;
Bassler, B. L. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 319; (e)
Reading, N. C.; Sperandio, V. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
2006, 254, 1.
2. (a) Chen, X.; Schauder, S.; Potier, N.; Van Dorsselaer, A.;
Pelczer, I.; Bassler, B. L.; Hughson, F. M. Nature 2002,
415, 545; (b) Miller, S. T.; Xavier, K. B.; Campagna, S. R.;
Taga, M.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Bassler, B. L.; Hughson, F.
M. Mol. Cell. 2004, 15, 677.
16. The bioluminescence- and b-galactosidase-inducing activ-
ities of ( )-DPD or (S)-8 were measured using a V. harveyi 9
and a Salmonella enterica Typhimurium15 reporter strains,
respectively. The luminescent reporter strain V. harveyi
BB170 was grown for 18 h at 30 ꢁC, with aeration, in
AB medium and was diluted 1:5000 into fresh AB medium.
The S. typhimurium MET844 strain was grown for 18 h
at 37 ꢁC in Luria Bertani (LB) medium and diluted 1:100
in LB. Next, DPD or 8 was added to each diluted bacterial
cell suspension at a 10% (v/v) final concentration, and
then shaken at 30 ꢁC (V. harveyi) or 37 ꢁC (S. typhimurium)
for 4 h. The backgrounds were determined by the
addition of sterile medium to diluted bacterial cell suspen-
sions. After the incubation period, the resulting light or
b-galactosidase production was measured with a lumino-
meter, directly or using the beta-Gal reporter gene assay
(chemiluminescent) (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and
activity was expressed as relative units of luminescence
(RLU) per second.
3. De Keersmaecker, S. C.; Sonck, K.; Vanderleyden, J.
Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 114.
4. Meijler, M. M.; Hom, L. G.; Kaufmann, G. F.; McKen-
zie, K. M.; Sun, C.; Moss, J. A.; Matsushita, M.; Janda,
K. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2106.
5. Semmelhack, M. F.; Campagna, S. R.; Federle, M. J.;
Bassler, B. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 569.
6. De Keersmaecker, S. C.; Varszegi, C.; van Boxel, N.;
Habel, L. W.; Metzger, K.; Daniels, R.; Marchal, K.; De
Vos, D.; Vanderleyden, J. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 19563.
7. Frezza, M.; Soulere, L.; Queneau, Y.; Doutheau, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6495.
8. (a) Potter, P. M.; Wadkins, R. M. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006,
13, 1045; (b) Kadereit, D.; Waldmann, H. Chem. Rev.
2001, 101, 3367.
9. Bassler, B. L.; Greenberg, E. P.; Stevens, A. M. J.
Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 4043.
10. Racemic and (S)-DPD were prepared according to Refs.
7,6, respectively.
17. Auger, S.; Krin, E.; Aymerich, S.; Gohar, M. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 937.
18. Biofilm inhibition was tested in a 96-well polyvinylchlo-
ride microtiter plate assay.17 Briefly, microtiter plates
were inoculated with a diluted overnight preculture of
the strain 407 of B. cereus. Synthetic (S)-DPD or (S)-8
were subsequently added to the microtiter wells and
biofilm density was measured after 24 h of incubation as
follows: the microtiter plate wells were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline, and bound cells were stained
with a 1% (wt/vol) crystal violet solution at room
temperature for 20 min. The wells were then washed and
the dye was solubilized with a 20:80 acetone/ethanol
mixture. The absorbance at 600 nm of the solubilized
dye was then determined. Assays were performed
triplicate.
11. NMR samples were prepared as follow: (S)-8 (1.8 mg,
8.33 lmol) was dissolved in a 100 mM Na2 HPO4 buffer in
D2O (0.6 mL, pH 7.4). 1H NMR spectra were recorded on
a Bruker spectrometer DRX 500 MHz each 10 min (64