Catalytic Performance of Nanoscopic, Aluminium Trifluoride-Based Catalysts
COMMUNICATIONS
After the reaction, the catalyst was separated from the two-
phase solvent mixture, the heptane phase (containing the to-
copherol) was separated from the propylene carbonate
phase and the solvent was removed under vacuum to give a
crude product.
might be beneficial but also a certain topological ar-
rangement at these catalysts may provide a high selec-
tivity towards formation of the desired phytyl carbo-
cations resulting in high regioselectivity to the desired
(all-rac)-a-tocopherol. All these are topics of ongoing
investigations.
In any case, the catalytic efficiency combined with
practical advantages (e.g., no external inert atmos-
phere and no azeotropic removal of water) of the cat-
alytic experimental set-up make this catalyst system
appealing even in the commercial stage.
The crude product was analysed by HPLC (column – EC
125/4.6 Nucleosil 120–5 C18; eluent: acetonitrile; flow rate:
0.8 mLminꢀ1
; wavelength: 280 nm; volume of sample:
15 mL) chromatography and H, 13C NMR (Bruker AV 400
spectrometer, in CDCl3 solvent and Me4Si as internal stan-
dard) spectroscopy. (all-rac)-a-Tocopherol: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d=0.90 (m, 12H, CH3), 1.0–1.9 (m,
26H, CH3, CH2, CH), 2.10 and 2.17 (both s, 9H, CH3-Ar),
2.60 (t, 2H, C4H2, J (H, H)=6.7 Hz), 4.3 (s, 1H, OH).
For compound characterisation the crude product was
separated by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent:
CH2Cl2) and analysed by 1H-1H COSY NMR and 1H-13C
HSQC NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3).
1
Experimental Section
Catalyst Preparation
For comparison, similar tests were done in the presence
Nanoscopic partly hydroxylated aluminium fluoride was pre-
pared from aluminium isopropoxide using a one-pot sol-gel
fluorination method as follows: 9.73 g (48 mmol) of com-
mercially available aluminium isopropoxide (Aldrich, 98+
%) were dissolved in 300 mL isopropyl alcohol and reacted
with a stoichiometric amount of approximately 40%, 50%,
60% or 70% hydrofluoric acid and the products are named
in Table 1 as AlF3-40, AlF3-50, AlF3-60 and AlF3-70. After
aging for 12 h, the resulting gel was dried under vacuum at
room temperature. The formed solid product was then dried
further under vacuum at 708C, for 5 h and used as obtained
in this way.
of HS-AlF3 prepared through
a two-step fluorination
method. The preparation of the sample is described in detail
elsewhere.[7]
Trimethylhydroquinone (97 wt%) and isophytol (95 wt%)
were purchased from Acros Organics. The other reagents
(analytical grade) were obtained from Merck.
Acknowledgements
Dr. S. M. Coman is a fellow of Alexander von Humboldt
Foundation. The authors kindly acknowledge I. Hartwich
and I. Buchem for preparing the catalysts.
Catalyst Characterisation
The XRD pattern was recorded with an XRD-7 Seiffert-
FPM diffractometer equipped with a Cu-Ka radiation
source. Textural properties were determined using N2 at
77 K for adsorption by means of a Micromeritics ASAP
2020 instrument. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet
Magna 550 spectrometer equipped with a liquid nitrogen
cooled MCT detector in transmission mode and purged by a
dry nitrogen flow. The resolution was 4 cmꢀ1 and 128 scans
were co-added for each spectrum. The cell for IR analysis
consisted of vitreous silica and was equipped with CaF2 win-
dows. The cell was connected to a vacuum line and a glass
injection loop with a known volume (2.15 cm3). CO (>
99.997% pure; supplied by Air Liquide, France) was provid-
ed from a gas balloon, dried with liquid N2, and dosed step-
wise on the sample. The detailed procedures of NH3-TPD
are given elsewere.[7]
References
[1] T. Netscher, Vitamins and Hormones 1996, 76, 155.
[2] W. Bonrath, C. Dittel, L. Giraudi, T. Netscher, T.
Pabst, Cat. Today 2007, 121, 65.
[3] M. B. Tarabrin, G. G. Shestakov, R. P. Evstigneeva, E.
Yu. Bulychev, Pharm. Chem. J. 1984, 18, 572.
[4] a) B. O. Linn, C. H. Shunk, E. L. Wong, K. Folkers, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 239; b) J. Greene, D.
McHale, J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 5060; c) K. A. Parker,
T. L. Mindt, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3875.
[5] a) F. Schager, W. Bonrath, J. Catal. 1999, 1, 282;
b) R. F. Childs, A. Mika-Gibala, J. Org. Chem. 1982,
47, 4207; c) A. Heidekum, M. A. Harmer, W. F. Hçlder-
ich, J. Catal. 1998, 176, 260; d) S. M. Coman, G. Pop, C.
Stere, V. I. Parvulescu, J. El Haskouri, D. Beltrꢈn, P.
Amorꢉs, J. Catal. 2007, 251, 388; e) A. Hasegawa, K.
Ishihara, H. Yamamoto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 5731.
[6] K. Ishihara. M. Kubota, H. Yamamoto, Synlett 1996,
1045.
[7] E. Kemnitz, S. M. Coman, S. Rꢁdiger, S. Wuttke, Eur.
Pat. Appl. EP 07 020 498.7, 2007.
[8] a) E. Kemnitz, U. Groß, St. Rꢁdiger, S. C. Shekar,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4251; b) T. Krahl, A.
Vimont, G. Eltanany, M. Daturi, E. Kemnitz, J. Phys.
Chem. C 2007, 111, 18317.
Synthesis of (all-rac)-a-Tocopherol
In a typical procedure, 152 mg (1 mmol) TMHQ, 304 mg
(2 mmol) TMHQ or 9.5 g (62.5 mmol) TMHQ was dissolved
in 6 mL or 375 mL of solvent [heptane:propylene carbonate
(50:50)] in a glass vial (standard capacity of 8 mL or
500 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer. To this mixture
0.4 mL (1 mmol) or 25 mL (62.5 mmol) of IP and 50 mg
(20.1ꢇ1017 acid centres/m2 – AlF3-H; 18.4ꢇ1017 acid centres/
m2 – HS- AlF3 calculated from NH3-TPD) or 3.1 g of AlF3-
H of catalyst were added. After this, the vial was closed, im-
mersed in an oil bath with a temperature of 1008C, and the
charged mixture was stirred (1250 rpm) for 30–1200 min.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2517 – 2524
ꢃ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2523