Cation−Π Interactions in Lectin−Ligand Complexes
A R T I C L E S
an attractive target for the design of further optimized inhibitors
as described below.
The complex with inhibitor 3 shows that the side chain of
Arg144 makes what appears to be a cation-Π interaction31 with
the benzyl substituent of the inhibitor. The 4.3 Å distance seen
between Nꢀ of the arginine side chain and the centroid of the
benzamido ring is in the range of what has previously been
observed for arene-guanidino distances within proteins struc-
tures.32 Cation-Π interactions have now been shown to be
important in protein stability, ligand binding, and enzyme
catalysis and typically, Arg side chains, Lys side chains, metal
ions, or ligand cations are found to interact with the side chains
of Trp, Tyr, or Phe.33-35 Experiments designed to measure the
strength of cation-Π interactions in biological systems have
shown that they range from -0.4 to -2.4 kcal/mol.35 Given
that fluorinated arenes have electron-poor Π-systems (in fact,
the quadrupole moment of 4-methoxy-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenz-
amide is small according to ab initio calculations) and thus form
weak cation-Π interactions,36,37 it may seem surprising that
the affinity-enhancing effect of the 4-methoxy-2,3,5,6-tetra-
fluorobenzamido-guanidino interaction is so large. However,
it has been shown that the electrostatic attraction between the
cation and the permanent quadrupole moment of the Π system
does not account entirely for the observed energetics in systems
involving cation-Π interactions31,35 and that van der Waals
interations,38 Π-Π interactions, charge-transfer effects, and
polarization effects must also be considered. In this case, the
methoxy group of 3 is positioned close to the guanidino group
of Arg144, which may allow for additional electrostatic interac-
tions that further increase the affinity.39 Moreover, fluorinated
hydrocarbons are poorly solvated in water and desolvation of
the 4-methoxy-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzamido moiety can be
expected to contribute substantially to the affinity of 3 for
galectin-3.
Figure 2. 2F0-Fc electron density map contoured at 1σ showing the
electron density associated with the inhibitor 3. The protein surface
accessible is shown and colored according to the charge (blue is positive,
and red is negative).
slightly increased in the present high-resolution structure to 180,
as compared to the 120 seen at lower resolution. Finally, we
observed six residues in alternate conformation, namely, Ile134,
Asn179, Asn222, Ser232, Ser244, and Met249. None of these
residues is in contact with the LacNAc disaccharide. Excluding
the atoms in alternate conformations, the root mean square
deviation (RMSD) of all atoms between the low- and high-
resolution structures is 0.26 Å. The high-resolution LacNAc
complex structure now includes 137 residues, 180 water
molecules, six residues in alternate conformations, one chloride
ion, and the LacNAc disaccharide.
Structure of Galectin-3 in Complex with Inhibitor 3.
Inhibitor 3 is found to bind in the galectin-3C LacNAc binding
site with the benzyl substituent in the extended site as expected
(Figure 2). The benzamide nitrogen at 3′-C of the galactose
residue is hydrogen-bonded to a water molecule, which is in
turn hydrogen-bonded to Oδ1 of Asn160 and NH1 of Arg144
(Figure 3a,b). The benzamide carbonyl oxygen is hydrogen-
bonded with two water molecules, one of which is further
hydrogen-bonded to the Nꢀ1 of Trp 181. These interactions with
the amido functionality may explain why the corresponding
phenyl sulfonamides or ureas at 3′-C are less efficient inhibi-
tors.24
Upon binding of inhibitor 3 the only significant change in
the galectin-3C structure is the conformational change observed
in the side chain of Arg144. The Arg144 guanidino group, which
in the complex with LacNAc is involved in a hydrogen bond
with water molecules at the galectin-3C surface, is moved 3.5
Å to interact with the benzamido ring of 3 (Figure 3c,d). From
being aligned along the galectin-3C surface in the complex with
LacNAc, the side chain of Arg144 adopts an all-staggered
conformation and points out toward the solvent in the complex
with 3. This type of ligand-induced change in conformation is
an example of one of the complications associated with the
structure-based approached to ligand design as recently re-
viewed.30 The central carbon (Cú) of the Arg144 guanidino
group is stacked on one side of the benzamido ring at a distance
of 3.5-4.2 Å from the carbon atoms of the aromatic ring. On
the other side of the benzamido ring, two water molecules are
found within 4.5 Å of its centroid. Additionally, one edge of
the benzamido ring sits in an extended nonpolar pocket formed
by the side chains of Arg144(Câ to Cδ), Ala146(Câ), and
Asn160(Câ). This extended nonpolar pocket thus emerged as
Synthesis of Second Generation Inhibitors. Earlier studies
in natural systems37,40 and in minimalized artificial systems in
water41 and organic solvents39,42 have concluded that electron-
withdrawing substituents (i.e. fluorine or nitro) on the aromatic
component weaken while electron-donating substituents (i.e.
dimethylamino) strengthen cation-Π interactions, observations
that suggest that the Π-electron density of the aromatic
component is of primary importance. To investigate the influ-
ence of the structure of the aromatic component of an arginine-
arene cation-Π interaction in a natural system and to discover
further improved inhibitors of galectin-3, we prepared 42
(31) Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303-1324.
(32) Flocco, M. M.; Mowbray, S. L. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 709-717.
(33) Gallivan, J. P.; Dougherty, D. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96,
9459-9464.
(34) Zacharias, N.; Dougherty, D. A. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2002, 23, 281-287.
(35) Meyer, E. A.; Castellano, R. K.; Diedrich, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 1210-1250.
(36) Mecozzi, S.; West, A. P., Jr.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 2307-2308.
(37) Zhong, W.; Gallivan, J. P.; Zhang, Y.; L., L.; Lester, H. A.; Dougherty, D.
A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 12088-12093.
(38) Mao, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14216-
14217.
(39) Rensing, S.; Arendt, M.; Springer, A.; Grawe, T.; Schrader, T. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 5814-5821.
(40) Mu, T.-W.; Lester, H. A.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
6850-6851.
(41) Ngola, S. M.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4566-4567.
(42) Hunter, C. A.; Low, C. M. R.; Rotger, C.; Vinter, J. G.; Zonta, C. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 4873-4876.
(30) Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J.; Kleywegt, G. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 2718-2736.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 6, 2005 1739