8428 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 36, 1997
Tsuji et al.
Table 1. 1H NMR Parameters for 1b, 3b, and 21ba
species HA(d) JAB (Hz) HB/HC(d) JBC (Hz) HD/HE(d) JDE (Hz)
1b
3b
21b
7.60
7.19
7.12
2.5 6.95, 7.14
8.8
2.4
6.4
4.44b
2.38, 2.50
1.95, 2.45
11.7
14.6
6.6
<1
6.45, 6.56
6.03, 6.13
<1
a In THF-d8 at -60 °C. The signals of OCH3 were observed at δ
3.94, 3.65, and 3.61 for 1b, 3b, and 21b, respectively. b The signal of
the other proton could not be identified, probably due to its overlap
with one of the much stronger signals due to the methoxy group of 3b
at δ 3.65, the solvent at δ 3.58, and water at δ 3.30.
Figure 3. Experimental and calculated (in parentheses) 1H NMR
chemical shifts for 1a, 3a, 21a, and 22.
latter to 1a. The observed spectra were, however, extremely
simple and of low relative intensities,28 and could accidentally
be due to unknown products. Therefore, recourse to theoretical
calculations was made to confirm the structural assignments.
Proton chemical shifts were calculated for 1a, 3a, 21a, and 22
by GIAO29 /6-31G* with the RHF/6-31G* geometries by using
the Gaussian 94 program package.30 The experimental and
computed proton chemical shifts summarized in Figure 3 are
in reasonable agreement with each other, supporting the above
assignments.31 Bis(prismane) 22 of the same symmetry is
apparently incompatible with either of the observed spectra. The
formation of the less symmetrical 2a was not detected again. A
signal for the methylene bridge protons of 21a was not
identified, probably owing to overlap with the much stronger
signal due to the residual protons in the deuterated THF at δ
1.75.
of two species in ca. 3% and 6% yields at the expense of 10%
of 3b. Both the newly observed two sets of signals are simple,
as listed in Table 1, and their characteristics unambiguously
indicated that both the generated species also retained the Ci
symmetry.25 Increase in the vicinal coupling between the
olefinic protons HB and HC from a small 2.4 Hz, characteristic
of cyclobutene,26a to 8.8 Hz in the minor product and 6.4 Hz in
the other, moreover, suggested the cleavage of the central bonds
of both the Dewar benzene moieties in both products. None of
the less symmetrical products resulting from the rearrangement
of only one of the Dewar benzenes, e.g., 2b, was detected by
the 1H NMR. When the resultant NMR sample was irradiated
with >390-nm light, the minor product was quantitatively
converted to the major product in close correspondence with
the changes in UV/vis absorption, implying that the former is
responsible for the absorption extending to 480 nm and the latter
for the one showing λmax at 267 nm.
Computational Analysis. The structure of 1a, its thermo-
dynamic stability relative to related compounds, and the strain
energy are of special interest. To gain insights into these points,
theoretical analyses were carried out by ab initio and DFT
quantum mechanical methods.
The observed UV/vis spectral changes and the details of 1H
NMR spectra are reasonably accommodated by postulating the
initial rearrangement of 3b into 1b, which was in turn
transformed into 21b via the transannular [4 + 4] photocy-
cloaddition. The downfield shifts of all the signals due to HA-
HE, coupled with the appearance of substantial coupling between
HA and HB, upon the initial isomerization strongly suggest the
aromatization of the Dewar benzenes. The subsequent upfield
shifts of the methylene proton signals and the decrease in their
mutual coupling from the normal 11.7 Hz to 6.6 Hz, typical of
cyclopropyl derivatives,26b upon secondary photolysis are also
consistent with the proposed transformation. The assignment
of the electronic absorption extending to 480 nm to 1b, which
possesses strongly interacting bent benzene chromophores,
seems reasonable, and the band at 267 nm is also compatible
with that in 21b.27 Thus, we concluded that 1b was successfully
generated photochemically from 3b, but prone to undergo the
secondary photolysis to give 21b.
Similar successive transformation was observed for 3a. Thus,
irradiation of 3a with a 254 nm light source in THF-d8 at -80
°C led to the development of three singlets at δ 3.38, 5.90, and
6.94 at the expense of two singlet signals at δ 2.24 and 6.48
due to 3a. When the resultant mixture was irradiated with
>335-nm light by which 3a was not affected, the singlet signal
at δ 5.90 was enhanced whereas those at δ 3.38 and 6.94
decayed. The former was accordingly assigned to 21a and the
(1) Geometry. The geometrical optimizations of 1a and 21a
were undertaken at the Hartree-Fock (RHF-SCF), second-order
perturbation (MP2) and density functional B3LYP levels
employing the 6-31G* basis set implemented in the Gaussian
94 program package.30 The structures of the related compounds,
2a and 3a, were also optimized at the RHF/6-31G* level and
with semiempirical MNDO Hamiltonian in the MOPAC 5.0
program.32 An initial exploration of the potential energy surface
of 1a with the 3-21G basis set furnished a single energy
minimum corresponding to the D2h symmetric 1a. The opti-
mizations with the 6-31G* basis set were accordingly performed
within the constraint of D2h symmetry. The optimized geo-
metrical parameters for 1a are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.
(28) The sample contained 1a, 21a, and 3a in a ratio of ca. 3:2:300 after
the initial irradiation with 254-nm light. Extended irradiation did not bring
about an appreciable increase in the proportion of (1a + 21a):3a and only
induced the decomposition of the products and 3a.
(29) Wolinski, K.; Hinton, J. F.; Pulay, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
8251.
(30) Gaussian 94 (Revision C.3), M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B.
Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T.
Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Rachavachari, M. A. Al-
Laham, V. G. Zackrewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B.
B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala,
W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L.
Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Steward, M.
Head-Gordon, C. Gonzales, J. A. Pople, Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA,
1995.
(24) According to calculations (MNDO and RHF/6-31G*), the central
six-membered ring of 3a is significantly bent in a boat form. Interconversion
between the bent conformers would be facile on the NMR time scale at
room temperature. By contrast, the optimized structures of 1a and 21a are
D2h symmetric (vide infra).
(31) It is of interest to compare the 1H NMR spectra of 1a,b with those
of the corresponding [2.2]paracyclophane homologues. The aromatic ring
protons of [2.2]paracyclophane resonate at δ 6.47. The protons of [2.2]-
paracyclophanedicarboxylic ester corresponding to the HA-C of 1b resonate
at δ 7.17 (d, J ) 1.8 Hz), 6.68 (dd, J ) 7.7 and 1.8 Hz), and 6.51 (d, J )
7.7 Hz), respectively. Hopf, H.; Lenich, F. T. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 1891-
1902.
(32) Stewart, J. J. P. QCPE Bull. 1989, 9, 10. Hirano, T. JCPE
NewsLetter 1989, 1, 36; Revised as Ver. 5.01 by Toyoda, J. for Apple
Macintosh.
(25) The 1H NMR spectra recorded in this experiment were shown in a
preliminary account of this work.8
(26) (a) Jackman, L. M.; Sternhell, S. Applications of Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Pergamon Press:
Oxford, England, 1969. (b) Morris, D. G. The Chemistry of Cyclopropyl
Group; Rappoport, Z., Ed.; J. Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 1987;
pp 101-172.
(27) Methyl tetracyclo[4.2.2.22,5.01,6]dodeca-3,7,9,11-tetraene-3-carboxy-
late, which possesses a π-bond system similar to that of 21b, exhibits λmax
at 274 nm.16
(33) (a) Lonsdale, K.; Milledge, H. J.; Krishna Rao, K. W. Proc. R. Soc.,
Ser. A 1960, 255, 82. (b) Hope, H.; Bernstein, J.; Trueblood, K. N. Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. B 1972, 28, 1733.