2594
M. Genov et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17 (2006) 2593–2595
a
Table 1. Results from the asymmetric Negishi couplings
b
c
Entry
Bromide 1
Reagent 2
Product 3
Pd source
Temperature (ꢁC)
Time (h)
Yield (%)
ee (%) (conf.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
1a
1b
1b
1c
1c
1d
1b
2a
2a
2b
2b
2c
2c
2a
2c
3a
3a
3b
3b
3c
3c
3d
3e
4
5
6
4
6
4
4
4
60
60
50
50
50
50
60
60
24
24
96
96
48
24
72
72
95
95
60
65
70
70
95
55
85 (S)
85 (S)
53 (S)
66 (S)
49 (S)
54 (S)
62 (S)
60 (n/a)
a
All reactions were carried out in THF (12.5 ml per 1 mmol of 1); ratio bromide (1)/zinc compound (2) = 1/1.5; 5 mol % Pd and 20 mol % ligand were
applied.
b
c
Isolated yield after column chromatography.
Determined by specific rotation
13–15
9
and HPLC measurements.
2
. Results and discussion
pling partners which, in our examples, is determined by
the substituent at the a-position of the Br or B atom respec-
tively of 1 and 2. Compound 3d (Table 1, entry 7) has been
synthesized with equal enantioselectivity but much better
Naphthyl bromides used were obtained commercially 1a or
were synthesized according to literature procedures 1b and
c. The bis(naphthalen-1-yl)zinc compounds 2a–c were
1
1
13
1
yield than with the corresponding Suzuki reaction.
obtained from the corresponding lithium compounds by
1
2
a modified literature procedure, treating the correspond-
ing lithium organometallic derivative with ZnCl solution
2
3
. Conclusion
in THF followed by filtration. The zinc compounds
obtained were used as THF solutions in the coupling
reactions.
In conclusion we have reported the first synthesis of chiral
binaphthalene derivatives using an enantioselective Negishi
cross-coupling reaction. This method is superior to the
Suzuki equivalent. The protocol is extremely efficient
affording up to 85% enantioselectivity and 95% yield
The reactions proceeded smoothly in THF under anhy-
drous conditions at moderate temperatures (50 and
60 ꢁC). As palladium sources Pd(0) (4) and Pd(II) (5 and
6) species were used. Applying the Pd catalysts 4–6 in
5 mol % and ligand 7 in 20 mol % we hoped to achieve a
0
in the synthesis of 2,2-dimethyl-1,1 -binaphthalene 3a.
Moreover, preliminary results show that these reaction
conditions can be applied to the efficient enantioselective
synthesis of a wider range of other naphthalene derivatives,
either with 7 or chiral ferrocenyl monophosphine ligands
with a similar structure. Looking at the trend of the yields
and enantioselectivities observed in Table 1, these results
may be even better for binaphthyl derivatives with some-
what bulkier substituents. These studies are currently in
progress in our laboratory.
high enantiomeric excess. Very good results were obtained,
especially for the couplings of 1a with 2a. (Table 1, entries
1
and 2). Compared to the results of the corresponding Su-
9
zuki reaction, the couplings reported herein proceeded
with better yields (almost quantitative), equal enantioselec-
tivities, and in remarkably shorter reaction times (24 h).
The same results were obtained with Pd
2
dba
3
ꢁ CHCl
3
4
or with [Pd(NCMe) ](BF ) 5. The coupling of 1b with 2b
4
4 2
proceeded with lower yields and enantioselectivities, but
using 4 instead of Pd(OAc) 6 increased the enantioselectiv-
ity (Table 1, entry 3 vs 4). Similar results were found for the
2
Acknowledgements
coupling of 1c with 2c, however, for shorter reaction times
This work was supported by the Direcci o´ n General de
Investigaci o´ n (MEC, Grant no. CTQ2004–07667), the pro-
gram Consolider Ingenio 2010 (Grant CSD2006-0003) and
the Junta de Castilla y Le o´ n (Project VA060/03). A Marie
Curie fellowship to M.G. (HPMD-CT-2000-00058) is also
gratefully acknowledged.
(
Table 1, entry 5 vs 6). The enantioselectivity observed in
the reactions decreased in the order Me > OBn > OMe
and appears to depend on the steric demand of the cou-
Typical procedure for the Negishi coupling reactions (see Table 1 and
Scheme 1): In a flame dried 50 ml Schlenk flask with a Young’s tap and
Teflon stirring bar were introduced 0.16 mmol of the desired bromide
1a–c, the palladium source 4–6 (0.008 mmol Pd), and the chiral ligand 7
References
(0.032 mmol), which were dissolved in 0.8 ml of THF. Then 1.2 ml of the
corresponding 0.2 M solution in THF of zinc compounds 2a–c were
added and the flask sealed and heated at the corresponding temperature.
The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After the time
indicated in Table 1, the reaction mixture was treated with 10 ml of
1. Pu, L. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2405–2494.
2. Putala, M. Enantiomer 1999, 4, 243–262.
3. Bringmann, G.; Breuning, M. Synthesis 1999, 525–558.
4. Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 4442–4489.
2 2 4
distilled water, extracted with 3 · 10 ml CH Cl , dried over MgSO , and
purified by flash chromatography (hexanes for 3a and 3d and hexanes/
diethyl ether 7/1 for 3b, 3c and 3e) to give the corresponding products
5. Dai, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2719–2724.
6. Milne, J. E.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
13028–13032.
3a–e.