870 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 48, No. 3, 2000
Czerny and Grosch
Ta ble 2. Cu ts, Selected Ion s, a n d Ca libr a tion F a ctor s for
MD-HRGCMS
were isolated according to procedure B and then analyzed by
MD-HRGCMS using the conditions shown in Table 2.
Compounds 18-20. Ground raw (25 g) and roasted coffees
(0.5 g) were extracted by isolation method C after addition of
known amounts of the internal standards d -18, d -19, and d -20.
The samples were analyzed by MD-HRGCMS (Table 2).
Od or Th r esh old Va lu es. The values were determined in
water (Semmelroch et al., 1995) and in air by HRGCO on the
capillary OV-1701 (J &W Scientific) according to the method
of Ullrich and Grosch (1988). Odor thresholds in cellulose were
determined by adding an ethereal solution of the odorant to
cellulose, which was purified according to the method of Czerny
et al. (1999). The mixture was shaken for 15 min, and aliquots
were diluted with increasing amounts of purified cellulose.
After shaking (15 min), each aliquot (1 g) was filled into a glass
beaker (diameter ) 40 mm, capacity ) 45 mL), and its odor
was compared in a triangle test with two samples of odorless
cellulose. The samples were presented in order of decreasing
concentration. Threshold values were calculated according to
a German Health Organization (1993) method.
RI range selected ion
selected ion calibra-
of cut on
of analyte
(m/z)
of int std
(m/z)
tion
analytea precolumnb
int stdc
factord
4
5
6
1030-1050
1050-1070
1430-1450
1400-1430
1400-1430
2170-2220
1510-1530
1480-1505
1510-1530
1990-2030
2160-2210
2510-2550
1820-1850
131
131
105
139
153
129
141
123
167
153
151
153
191
d -4
d -5
d -6
d -9
d -10
c-12
d -13
d -14
d -15
d -18
d -19
d -20
d -22
134
134
108
142
156
131
143
125
0.87
0.85
1.05
1.00
1.06
1.00
1.06
0.98
0.95
0.72
1.12
1.01
0.75
9
10
12
13
14
15
18
19
20
22
170
156-158e
154
156
195-197e
a
b
Numbering refers to Table 1. Retention index (RI) range of
the effluent from the precolumn which was transferred onto the
d
main column. c Abbreviations: c, carbon-13; d, deuterium. The
calibration factor refers to 1:1 (by weight) mixture for the labeled
and unlabeled compounds (Guth and Grosch, 1990; Semmelroch
et al., 1995). e The sum of the relative abundances of the ions was
calculated.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
AEDA revealed 21 potent odorants in raw coffee
showing FD factors of 16 and higher (Table 1). Hexanal
(1), butyric acid (2), the mixture of 2- and 3-methylbu-
tyric acid (3), pentanoic acid (7), 1-octen-3-one (8),
sotolon (12), 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (15), and
vanillin (20) were identified in the neutral-basic and
acid fractions without further enrichment (Table 1). In
the cases of the methoxypyrazines 9 and 10 and in that
of (Z)-2-nonenal (13), the identification was successful
when an extract containing the volatile compounds was
consecutively separated on two capillary columns using
MD-HRGCMS. This technique provided also clear MS-
EI signals for the esters 4 and 5, methional (6), and
nonenal 14 as well as for the phenols 18 and 19 when
these odorants were at first enriched by column chro-
matography in the fractions listed in Table 1. For
identification of linalool (11), a purification by column
chromatography was sufficient. Only the sweet, minty
odorants 16 and 17 and the sweet-smelling odorant 21
were not identified. Enantioselective analysis of ethyl
2-methylbutyrate (4) confirmed the results of Wo¨hr-
mann et al. (1997) that 95% of 4 was the (S)-enantiomer.
AEDA indicated for the peasy smelling 3-isobutyl-2-
methoxypyrazine (15) the highest FD factor. With an
8-fold lower FD factor, 2-methoxy-3,5-dimethylpyrazine
(9) was identified as another very odor-active compound.
A comparison with the literature (references in Table
1) indicates that the earthy-smelling pyrazine 9 as well
as sotolon (12) and 4-ethylguaiacol (19) was identified
for the first time in raw coffee. AEDA of coffee powder
(data not shown) revealed compound 9 as an aroma
compound, but its FD factor was low in comparison to
those of other odorants of coffee powder.
2-Methoxy-3,5-dimethylpyrazine (9) has been detected
as a metabolite of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria
(Mottram et al., 1984), which were isolated from a
machine cutting-fluid emulsion. There are indications
that the methoxypyrazines occurring in raw coffee are
also produced by bacteria which enter the fruits through
holes caused by insects such as the variegated coffee
bug (Anestiopsis orbitalis) (Bouyjou et al., 1999).
The odor threshold of 3 µg/L in water published by
Calabretta (1973) for pyrazine 9 is much too high. We
found threshold values of 0.0004 µg/L (water), 0.006 µg/
kg (cellulose), and 0.000001 µg/L (air). However, the
latter very low odor threshold increases drastically to
56 ng/L (air) when the methoxy group at position 2 of
1H NMR Sp ectr oscop y. 1H NMR spectra were recorded
with an AM 360 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe,
Germany). The substances were dissolved in CDCl3 containing
tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard.
Isola tion of Vola tiles. Procedure A. The ground sample
(25 g) was suspended into CH2Cl2 (4 × 100 mL) and then
stirred for a total period of 4 h. The extract was concentrated
to 100 mL by distilling off the solvent on a Vigreux column
(40 × 1 cm) and distilled in vacuo (5 mPa, 50 °C) using the
apparatus described by Sen et al. (1991) and J ung et al. (1992).
The condensate was separated in the neutral-basic and the
acidic volatiles (Rychlik and Grosch, 1996). Each fraction was
concentrated to 0.1 mL by distilling off the solvent on a Vigreux
column (40 × 1 cm) and by microdistillation (Bemelmans,
1979). The neutral-basic volatiles were fractionated at 12 °C
on a water-cooled column (30 × 1 cm) packed with a slurry of
silica gel 60 in pentane. After application of the sample,
stepwise elution was performed with the following pentane/
diethyl ether mixtures (100 mL each): 9:1 (v/v, fraction I), 8:2
(v/v, fraction II), 7:3 (v/v, fraction III), and 1:1 (v/v, fraction
IV). Finally, the column was eluted with diethyl ether (100
mL, fraction V). After concentration to ∼100 µL by distilling
off the solvents on a Vigreux column (40 × 1 cm) and by
microdistillation (Bemelmans, 1979), each fraction was ana-
lyzed by HRGCMS.
Procedure B. The condensate obtained by distillation in
vacuo according to procedure A was concentrated to 0.1 mL
as reported above and then analyzed by MD-HRGCMS.
Procedure C. The sample of ground raw coffee (25 g) or
ground roasted coffee (0.5 g) was suspended in a mixture of
water, CH2Cl2, and methanol (4:5:10, v/v/v, 100 mL), and then
the suspension was stirred for 3 h. After filtration, the residue
was extracted again with the solvent mixture (100 mL) and
CH2Cl2 (100 mL) for 1 h each. The extracts were combined,
and the organic phase was separated, treated with water (100
mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The extract was
concentrated to 100 mL by distilling off the solvent over a
Vigreux column. Isolation and concentration of the volatiles
were performed as reported for procedure A.
Ar om a Extr a ct Dilu tion An a lysis (AEDA). The fractions
containing the neutral-basic and the acidic volatiles (procedure
A) of raw coffee were stepwise diluted with CH2Cl2 (1:2, v/v).
AEDA was performed by HRGCO using the capillaries DB-5
und DB-FFAP (Ullrich and Grosch, 1987).
Qu a n tifica tion of Od or a n ts. Compounds 4-6, 9, 10, 12-
15, and 22. After addition of known amounts of the internal
standards d -4, d -5, d -6, d -9, d -10, c-12, d -13, d -14, d -15, and
d -22 to the extraction solvent, the analytes and their standards