Table 1 Dearomatising carbolithiation–quench of TMP amides
Starting
material
Entry
R
E+
Product
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
s-Bu
MeI
BnBr
EtI
9a ( = 3a) 71a
a
9b
9c
9d
9e
9f
61
51
32
76
40
22
12
23
15
55
a
a
(CH
2
)
3
CNO
ab
4
NH Cl
Scheme 4 Deprotecting the amide.
n-BuLi
MeLi
s-Bu
MeI
MeI
MeI
MeI
9g
5
6
11a
13a
13b
15a
aromatic rings as precursors of substituted cyclohexane deriva-
tives without recourse to transition metal chemistry.
We are grateful to the EPSRC and to GlaxoSmithKline for
support.
s-Bu
c
1
1
a
0
1
4
NH Cl
7
s-Bu
MeI
b
3
+1 Mixture of diastereoisomers at Et(Me)CH. Mixture of g and e-
c
protonated regioisomers. a-Protonated regioisomer.
Notes and references
†
Typical procedure: sec-Butyllithium (1.3 M in hexane, 0.68 ml, 1.2
equiv.) was slowly added to a stirred solution of the amide 1 (0.20 g, 0.74
mmol) in dry THF (7 ml) at 0 °C under nitrogen. After 1 h, iodomethane
(0.14 ml, 3 equiv.) was added and the mixture was allowed to warm to room
temperature. After a further 45 min, a saturated solution of ammonium
chloride (15 ml) was added and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate
(2 3 20 ml). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (2 3 20
ml) and dried over magnesium sulfate. Concentration under reduced
pressure yielded the crude product as yellow oil. Purification by flash
chromatography (1+14 EtOAc–petroleum ether (bp 40–60)) afforded the
dearomatised product 3a (0.19 g, 71%) as a mixture of diastereoisomers
(3+1), plus starting material 1 (12 mg, 6%). Data for major diastereoisomer:
Scheme 3 Conformation and reactivity.
d
2
2
1
H 3
(300 MHz; CDCl ): 7.40 (1 H, d, J 6.6), 4.97 (1 H, d, J 6.6), 3.66 (3H, s),
.69 (1 H, d, J 2.7), 2.28 (1 H, q, J 7.2), 1.72 (3H, m), 1.52 (3 H, td, J 6.0,
.4), 1.28–1.20 (12 H, m), 1.06–0.92 (6 H, m) and 0.72 (3 H, d, J 6.9); nmax
625 cm (CNO); MS: found, M + H , m/z 348.2903. C23H38NO requires
2
Other substituted benzamides react less efficiently. The
,4-dimethoxybenzamide 5 reacts in a manner analogous to 1
3
21
+
and 7 but only very slowly—the reaction in entry 8 returns
mainly starting amide. The m-methoxy substituted compound 6
by contrast undergoes addition of s-BuLi at the para position,
and quenching with MeI or protonation generates diastereo-
isomers of 13a and 13b.
Amides of TMP have unusual structural features, which
display themselves spectroscopically, and which may shed light
on this unusual reactivity.11 Most significantly, the barrier to C–
M, 348.2902.
The amides were formed by heating to reflux the appropriate acyl chloride
with the sodium salt of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine in toluene for 24 h.
‡
1
2
3
4
5
T. Bach, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1996, 35, 729.
L. N. Mander, Synlett, 1991, 134.
P. W. Rabideau and Z. Marcinow, Org. React., 1992, 42, 1.
A. G. Schultz, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1263.
Naphthalenes and some heteroaromatics have a greater tendency to
dearomatise by nucleophilic addition. See, for representative examples:
S. V. Kolotuchin and A. I. Meyers, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 3018; K.
Tomioka, M. Shindo and K. Koga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 1739; B.
Plunian, J. Mortier, M. Vaultier and L. Toupet, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61,
2
1
11
12
N rotation in the amides is particularly low: 28 kJ mol for 7
2
1
compared with ca. 65 kJ mol for N,N-dimethylbenzamide.
This must be due to steric encumbrance of the normal planar
amide structure, and we propose that while 1 probably adopts
conformation 16a, with the ring twisted out of the amide plane,
as its ground state, a de-conjugated conformation approximat-
ing to 16b is relatively easily accessible (Scheme 3). In
conformation 16b, Ar–CO conjugation activates the ring
towards nucleophilic attack while the four methyl groups shield
the carbonyl from the incoming nucleophilic reagent, and we
propose that dearomatisation arises by attack on 16b.
The TMP feature of the amide is relatively sensitive to
cleavage under acid conditions. For example, treatment of 3a ( =
a) with iodotrimethylsilane in the absence of light cleaved both
the enol ether and the TMP ring, yielding the secondary amide
7 in 50% yield (Scheme 4).
5
206; J. Clayden, C. S. Frampton, C. McCarthy and N. Westlund,
Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 14161; J. Clayden and M. N. Kenworthy, Org.
Lett., 2002, 4, 787; F. Rezgui, P. Mangeney and A. Alexakis,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 6241; D. L. Comins, X. Zheng and R. R.
Goehring, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1611.
6
A number of intermolecular dearomatising reactions—dearomatising
cyclisations—and rearrangements have been reported. For recent
examples, see: J. Clayden, C. J. Menet and D. J. Mansfield, Org. Lett.,
2000, 2, 4229 and references therein.
7 E. P. Kündig, D. Amurrio, G. Anderson, D. Beruben, K. Khan, A. Ripa
and L. Ronggang, Pure Appl. Chem., 1997, 69, 543.
9
8
K. Maruoka, M. Ito and H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
091.
9
1
9
S. Norsikian, I. Marek, S. Klein, J. F. Poisson and J. F. Normant, Chem.
Eur. J., 1999, 5, 2055.
Treatment of hindered amides with strong bases is well
established as a method for the synthesis of aromatic com-
pounds by ortholithiation.10 This reaction appears to place some
limits of the types of amides which may be successfully
ortholithiated, but it also opens up new prospects for the use of
1
0 V. Snieckus, Chem. Rev., 1990, 90, 879.
1
1 L. Lunazzi, D. Macciantelli, D. Tassi and A. Dondoni, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1980, 717.
12 W. H. Stewart and T. H. Siddall, Chem. Rev., 1970, 70, 517.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2138–2139
2139