Sápi et al.
Designed Pt Promoted 3D Mesoporous Co3O4 Catalyst in CO2 Hydrogenation
supported noble metals, probably it occurs at metal/oxide
interface, at Pt-CoO in present case. Finally, it was proved
that the controlled size Pt nanoparticles on a mesoporous
material as a designed catalyst, was more efficient in the
same catalytic reaction, than the prepared by the classic
method. The authors assume that the catalyst design is an
essential step in the future of the heterogeneous catalysis.
Acknowledgment: This work was supported by the
János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian
Academy of Sciences and the ÚNKP-ÚNKP-16-4 New
National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human
Capacities as well as the Hungarian Research Development
and Innovation Office through grants NKFIH OTKA PD
120877 of András Sápi, Ákos Kukovecz and Gyula Halasi
are grateful for the fund of NKFIH (OTKA) K112531 and
PD 115769, respectively. This collaborative research was
partially supported by the “Széchenyi 2020” program in
the framework of GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00013“Intelligent
materials based on functional surfaces—from syntheses to
applications” project. The authors would like to express
their thanks to Balázs Nagy for his help and they are also
grateful for Koppány L. Juhász and Dorina G. Dobó for
their work considering the catalysts preparation.
Figure 4. Selectivity values of the products in the CO2 + H2 reaction
on different Pt promoted catalysts at 673 K.
The product distribution obtained on Pt/Co3O4 suggests
that Step 5 is dominant at low temperatures while the
CO formation mechanism (Steps 6 and 7) are favorable
at higher temperatures. The CH4 formation via formate
hydrogenation may involve the hydrogenation of adsorbed
carbonyl.
References and Notes
IP: 91.243.93.135 On: Wed,11. 9WD. Wecang2,0S1. 8Wa0n1g,:4X6. :M3a7, and J. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3703
(2011).
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
2. S. Saeidi, N. A. S. Amin, and M. R. Rahimpour, J. CO2 Utilization
4. CONCLUSION
Delivered by Ingenta
5, 66 (2014).
3. C. Schild, A. Wokaun, and A. Baiker, J. Mol. Catal. 63, 243 (1990).
4. I. A. Fisher and A. T. Bell, J. Catal. 162, 54 (1996).
5. X. Wang, H. Shi, J. H. Kwak, and J. Szanyi, ACS Catal. 5, 6337
(2015).
6. S. Rönsch, J. Schneider, S. Matthischke, M. Schlüter, M. Götz,
J. Lefebvre, P. Prabhakaran, and S. Bajohr, Fuel 166, 276 (2016).
7. F. Solymosi, J. Mol. Catal. 65, 337 (1991).
8. H. J. Freund and M. W. Roberts, Surf. Sci. Rep. 25, 225 (1996).
9. N. M. Dimitrijevic, B. K. Vijayan, O. G. Pouektov, T. Rajh, K. A.
Gray, H. He, and P. Zapol, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 3964 (2011).
10. H. Narayanan, B. Viswanathan, and S. Yesodharan, Curr. Catal.
5, 79 (2016).
Controlled size Pt nanoparticles were synthesized by a
polyol method using ethylene glycol as a media and PVP
as a capping agent from Pt-salts. 3ꢅ6 1ꢅ25 nm Pt nanopar-
ticles were obtained where the particles have narrow size
distributions as well as spherical shape. Pt nanoparticles
were supported on SBA-15, on mesoporous cobalt-oxide
and on commercial Co3O4 with impregnation method.
Exclusively almost CO was formed on Pt/SBA-15 dur-
ing CO2 dehydrogenation. In contrast, on Pt supported on
mesoporous Co3O4 large amount of methane was formed
at low temperature (570–600 K). When the temperature
was raised the methane formation decreased and CO pro-
duction increased. The different product distributions on
Pt/SBA-15 and Pt/Co3O4 suppose different reaction mech-
anisms in carbon-dioxide hydrogenation. Based on the
reaction products (CO and water) on Pt/SBA-15 we pro-
pose the reverse water-gas shift reaction mechanism in
first approximation. When the reducible oxide (Co3O4ꢁ is
the catalysts support, the reaction mechanism could be
different, although the above-mentioned mechanism could
be also valid in certain extent. We suppose that formate
species is an important reaction intermediate. This for-
mate species may reacts and decomposes further form-
ing methane or CO. This reaction step is supposed on
11. Gy. Halasi, A. Gazsi, T. Bánsági, and F. Solymosi, Appl. Catal. A
Gen. 506, 85 (2015).
12. F. Solymosi, A. Erdo˝helyi, and T. Bánsági, J. Catal. 68, 371 (1981).
13. S. Kattel, B. Yan, J. G. Chen, and P. Liu, J. Catal. 343, 115 (2016).
14. K. An, S. Alayoglu, N. Musselwhite, S. Plamthottam, G. Melaet,
E. Lindeman, and G. Somorjai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16689
(2013).
15. B. Ouyang, S. Xiong, Y. Zhang, B. Liu, and J. Li, Applied Catal. A
Gen. 543, 189 (2017).
16. A. Sápi, D. G. Dobó, D. Sebo˝k, Gy. Halasi, K. L. Juhász,
A. Szamosvölgyi, P. Pusztai, E. Varga, I. Kálomista, G. Galbács,
A. Kukovecz, and Z. Kónya, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 5130 (2017).
17. F. Solymosi, A. Erdo˝helyi, and T. Bánsági, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday
Trans. 77, 2645 (1981).
18. X. Wang, Y. Hong, H. Shi, and J. Szanyi, J. Catal. 343, 185 (2016).
19. X. Wang, H. Shi, and J. Szanyi, Nature Comm. 8, 513 (2017).
20. J. Raskó, T. Kecskés, and J. Kiss, J. Catal. 226, 183 (2004).
Received: 30 September 2017. Accepted: 11 January 2018.
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 19, 436–441, 2019
441