Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
synthesized bulk sample exhibited poor performance (FE-
hexahydroxytriphenylene) (Figure S12) were selected as
comparative materials. PcCo-Cu-O and CuHHTP were
−
2
(
2 4
effect of particle size on electrochemical activity. In order to
further increase the conductivity of the catalyst, we deposited
PcCu-Cu-O on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with weight ratios
12,37
prepared according to the previous reports,
PcCo-Cu-O is isostructural to PcCu-Cu-O, being constructed
by the PcCo-(OH) ligands and the square-planar CuO
of 2:1. However, PcCu-Cu-O/CNT just gave H as the main
2
8
4
nodes. CuHHTP is constructed by tripodal bridging HHTP
−
1.6 V vs RHE) and yielded no C H (Figure S7a), which
ligands and CuO nodes. The electrocatalytic activities for
2
4
4
performance of PcCu-Cu-O is not only much higher than
CO RR of PcCo-Cu-O and CuHHTP were examined under
2
12,37
the same conditions. Similar to the reported performances,
both of PcCo-Cu-O and CuHHTP just gave CO as the main
1
1
and all reported MOFs and MOF derivatives (Table S1)
2
9−31
2
4
but also higher than those of most copper salts, copper
nanoparticles, and copper alloys (Figure 2c), such as
suggesting that the CuPc unit should serve as the C H -
2 4
producing active site and both the CoPc and CuO units
4
3
2
CuOHFCl (FE(C H ) of 36.3%), CuPd (FE(C H ) of
should serve as the CO-producing active sites. On the other
2
4
2
4
3
3
34
4
8%), and Cu nanocube-O (FE(C H ) of 45%) under
hand, the performance of PcCu-Cu-O (FE(C H ) of 50%) is
2
4
2
4
11
similar conditions. Actually, to our best knowledge, only a
reconstructed nanocopper electrocatalyst exhibited a higher
much higher than that of PcCu (FE(C H ) of 25%), thus the
2 4
enhanced electrochemical performance of PcCu-Cu-O may be
ascribed to the synergistic effect between CuPc and CuO4
units.
35
FE(C H ) than that of PcCu-Cu-O in neutral electrolyte,
2
4
but the high selectivity was obtained at a higher potential of
about −2.0 V vs RHE, indicative of a higher energy
consumption (Figure 2c and Table S1).
To understand the synergistic effect between CuPc and
CuO units in PcCu-Cu-O during electrocatalytic CO RR, the
4
2
To evaluate the durability, PcCu-Cu-O was treated with
adsorption energies of *CO intermediates adsorbed on them
were calculated by the periodic density functional theory
(PDFT). The two *CO intermediates adsorbed on the CuPc
continuous electroreduction of CO at −1.2 V. The i−t curve
2
indicates that the performance of PcCu-Cu-O is durable for at
least 4 h (Figure 2d). According to PXRD patterns, scanning
electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron micro-
and CuO units are separated by 8.95 Å, obviously not suitable
4
for direct C−C dimerization into the *OCCOH intermediate.
Thus, one of the *CO intermediates needs to be desorbed
before the C−C dimerization. For the CuPc unit, the *CO
changes during the electrocatalysis (Figure S10). Most
importantly, in-situ operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy
−
1
adsorption energy is about 48 kJ mol , being much higher
−
1
than that of the CuO unit (16 kJ mol ), which can be
4
ascribed to the different coordination fields around the metal
(
XAS) experiments of PcCu-Cu-O indicated that no
significant change in Cu K-edges, or no visible metallic Cu
0) signals, could be observed in the X-ray absorption near-
ions. Since the CuO unit has a high activity for reduction of
4
10
CO to CO, the lower *CO adsorption energy of the CuO4
2
(
unit implies that it could serve as the ideal CO source for C−C
observed in the extended X-ray absorption fine structure
dimerization on CuPc during electrocatalytic CO RR. On the
2
other hand, the higher *CO adsorption energy of the CuPc site
is beneficial for the hydrogenation of CO into *CHO before
the C−C dimerization. Therefore, the combination of CuPc
(
EXAFS) spectrum. Therefore, PcCu-Cu-O has sufficient
durability for electroconversion of CO to C H . In the
and CuO units in PcCu-Cu-O significantly reduces the energy
2
2
4
4
4
,14
literature,
during the electrocatalytic CO RR process, the
barrier of C−C dimerization, compared with those of the
2
Cu−N interaction in the discrete molecular CuPc catalyst is
not strong enough to stabilize the copper ion centers, and the
aggregation of these atomically dispersed Cu atoms leads to
the generation of Cu clusters and nanoparticles. By
comparison, as for PcCu-Cu-O, on the one hand, the electron
donating effect of the oxygen atoms in PcCu-Cu-O can
enhance the coordination ability of nitrogen atoms, thus
enhancing the Cu−N interactions; on the other hand, we think
that the high crystallinity and the strong π−π interaction
between MOF layers can limit the distortion of Cu ions from
tetragonal to tetrahedral. Therefore, CuPc based MOFs with
high crystallinity exhibit high stability during electrocatalysis
without distortion of Cu ions.
Aspired by XANES and EXAFS results, we think that no
aggregated Cu(0) atoms exist during the catalytic process, and
thus the excellent electrochemical performance should not be
ascribed to the aggregated sites which has been illustrated in
many literature works.
possesses two types of potential Cu-based active sites, namely
discrete molecular PcCu and PcCu-(OH) in the catalysis,
8
leading to a much better performance. In other words, the CO
molecule desorbed on the CuO unit can easily migrate to
4
dimerize with the *CHO intermediate adsorbed on CuPc unit,
forming the *OCCHO intermediate, as shown in the proposed
mechanism of CO RR to C H depicted in Figure 3a. A similar
2
2
4
mechanism of C−C dimerization on a catalyst with a single
21
active site has been documented previously.
(Figure 3b and c), the absorption peaks at 1253 and 1396
−
1
cm could be attributed to the C−O stretch and symmetric
vibration (vibration of O−CO) of the *COOH inter-
37
−1
mediate, respectively, and the peak at 1575 and 1713 cm
could be attributed to the asymmetric vibration of *COCHO
and CO stretching of carbonyl intermediates, respectively.
−
1
Additionally, the peak at 1031 cm could be ascribed to the
14,36
As shown in Figure 1, PcCu-Cu-O
nonplanar vibration (OC−H) of the *CHO intermedi-
3
7,38
ate.
Most importantly, the absorption peaks of the
−
1
CuPc and CuO units. In order to clarify the electrocatalytic
*CH intermediate (894 cm for C−H bending vibration
4
2
7
244
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7242−7246