J. S. Yada6 et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 9695–9697
9697
estingly, a catalytic amount of TMSI was also found to
be equally effective for this conversion. However, the
use of allyltri-n-butyltin in place of allyltrimethylsilane
did not yield any product under these reaction condi-
tions, perhaps because iodine does not interact with
allyltri-n-butyltin. Furthermore, the reactions of
enones, with allylsilane in the presence of metal triflates
such as scandium or ytterbium triflate afforded 1,2-
adducts predominantly. In addition, attempted allyla-
tion with allylsilane and solid acids such as K10 clay
and Amberlyst-15 gave only 1,2-adducts. Thus, the
combination of allyltrimethylsilane and iodine could be
the method of choice for conjugate allylation of enones.
There are many advantages in the use of elemental
iodine as catalyst for this transformation, which include
high yields of products, mild reaction conditions,
greater selectivity, cleaner reaction profiles and opera-
tional simplicity. No additives or acidic promoters are
required for the reaction to proceed. The catalyst is
readily available at low cost and is highly efficient in
promoting conjugate allylations.
3. Yanagisawa, A.; Habaue, S.; Yasue, K.; Yamamoto, H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6130.
4. (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Ellsworth, E. L.; Dimock, S. H.;
Smith, R. A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4404; (b)
Lipshutz, B. H.; Hackmann, C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
7437.
5. (a) Lee, P. H.; Ahn, H.; Lee, K.; Sung, S.-Y.; Kim, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 37; (b) Lee, P. H.; Lee, K.;
Sung, S.-Y.; Chang, S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8646.
6. Shibata, I.; Kano, T.; Kanazawa, N.; Fukuoka, S.; Baba,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1389.
7. (a) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Hashim, S. R. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3025; (b) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy,
B. V. S.; Sabitha, G.; Reddy, G. S. K. K. Synthesis 2000,
1532; (c) Kumar, H. M. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, E. J.;
Yadav, J. S. Chem. Lett. 1999, 857; (d) Yadav, J. S.;
Reddy, B. V. S.; Rao, C. V.; Chand, P. K.; Prasad, A. R.
Synlett 2001, 1638.
8. General procedure: To a stirred solution of the a,b-unsatu-
rated ketone (1 mmol), and iodine (0.2 mmol) in
dichloromethane (10 mL), allyltrimethylsilane (1.5 mmol)
was added slowly at 0°C and the mixture stirred at rt for
the appropriate time (Table 1). After complete conversion
as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was quenched
with water (15 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane
(2×15 mL). The combined extracts were washed with a
15% solution of sodium thiosulphate, dried over anhy-
drous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting
product was purified by column chromatography on silica
gel (Merck, 100–200 mesh, ethyl acetate–hexane, 1:9) to
afford the pure product.
In summary, this paper describes a simple and efficient
method for the conjugate allylation of a,b-unsaturated
ketones using the cheap and readily available elemental
iodine as catalyst. In addition to its efficiency, simplic-
ity and mild reaction conditions, this method provides
high yields of products with high selectivity, which
makes it a useful and attractive process for the synthe-
sis of d,o-unsaturated ketones of synthetic importance.
1
Spectral data for selected products: 2e: H NMR (CDCl3)
Acknowledgements
l: 2.0 (s, 3H), 2.30–2.35 (dd, 2H, J=5.5, 7.0, 12.5 Hz),
2.70–2.75 (dd, 2H, J=6.0, 12.5 Hz), 3.25–3.30 (m, 1H),
4.97–5.0 (2d, 2H, J=17.0, 10.2 Hz), 5.58–5.65 (ddt, 1H,
J=17.0, 10.2, 7.0 Hz), 7.20–7.35 (m, 5H). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, proton decoupled, 50 MHz) l: 30.7, 40.6, 40.8,
B.V.S. thanks CSIR, New Delhi for the award of a
fellowship.
49.5, 116.7, 126.4, 127.5, 128.4, 136.2, 144.1, 207.8. EIMS:
+
m/z: 188 M IR (KBr) w: 3015, 2951, 1705, 1440, 1398,
References
1108, 963, 770.
2i: H NMR (CDCl3) l: 1.35–1.40 (m, 1H), 1.60–1.64 (m,
1H), 1.82–2.75 (m, 6H), 2.25–2.41 (m, 3H), 5.05 (2d, 2H,
J=17.8, 10.7 Hz), 5.75 (ddt, 1H, J=17.8, 10.7, 7.0 Hz).
13C NMR (CDCl3, proton decoupled, 50 MHz) l: 25.0,
1
1. (a) Colvin, E. Silicon in Organic Synthesis; Butterworth:
London, 1981; p. 97; (b) Hosomi, A. Acc. Chem. Res.
1988, 21, 200; (c) Langkopf, E.; Schinzer, D. Chem. Rev.
1995, 95, 1375.
2. (a) Hosomi, A.; Sakurai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
1673; (b) Fleming, I.; Dunogues, J.; Smithers, R. Org.
React. 1989, 37, 57–575.
30.7, 38.6, 40.7, 41.3, 47.5, 116.7, 135.6, 211.4. EIMS: m/z:
138 M IR (KBr) w: 3025, 2950, 1690, 1443, 1390, 1108,
+
970, 763.