I.V. Ilyina et al. / Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
5
Table 2
Antiviral activity of (4R)-11a against influenza viruses.
b,c
Strain
Subtype
Origin
Drug resistancea
IC50
SId
A/Puerto Rico/8/34
A/California/07/09
A/Vladivostok/02/09
A/Singapore/1/57
H1N1
H1N1pdm09
H1N1
H2N2
H3N2
H5N2
H7N3
Yamagata-like
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Avian
Am
Am
Os
–
–
–
7.5 1.1
0.9 0.2
>1415.1
0.9 0.3
189
1570
1
1570
1
9
2
83
A/Aichi/2/68
>1415.1
A/mallard/Pennsylvania/10218/84
A/mallard/Netherlands/12/00
B/Florida/04/06
160.4 20.1
613.2 42.5
17.0 2.2
Avian
Human
–
Am
a
b
c
‘‘Am” – amantadine/rimantadine, ‘‘Os” – oseltamivir, ‘‘ꢀ” – susceptible to both adamantanes and Os.
IC50 is the 50% inhibiting concentration; i.e., the concentration causing a 50% decrease in virus replication.
CC50 data are given as mean SD of three replicates.
d
SI is the selectivity index, which is the CC50/IC50 ratio.
cis-conjugated instead of trans-conjugation in 11a, exhibited a
lower antiviral activity and was much more toxic than 11a.
The findings demonstrate that the carbon backbone length and
ring size in substituents at the C(2) position have a significant
effect responsible for the antiviral activity in the synthesized
octahydro-2H-chromenols: antiviral activity decreases, while cyto-
toxicity simultaneously increases for longer substituent length /
ring size. Thus, among the compounds (4R)-11a–c derived from
linear ketones, the highest activity was exhibited by (4R)-11a syn-
thesized from acetone 10a (SI = 189). Octahydro-2H-chromenol
(4R)-11b derived from 3-pentanone 10b possessed a moderate
activity, with SI = 10, whereas compound (R)-11c derived from 4-
heptanone 10c demonstrated very low selectivity index (SI = 3)
with respect to the influenza virus strain used.
Among the compounds (4R)-17a–d with a spirocyclic frame-
work, significant antiviral activity in combination with low cyto-
toxicity was observed for (4R)-17a (IC50 = 8.4 mM, SI = 96)
synthesized from cyclopentanone 18a. An increase in ring size at
the C(2) position of the chromene framework when proceeding
from (4R)-17a to (4R)-17b derived from cyclohexanone 18b results
in reduction of antiviral activity (IC50 = 18.3 mM, SI = 34). The
remaining compounds (4R)-17c,d synthesized via the reactions
between (ꢀ)-isopulegol 7 and ketones with a larger ring size
exhibited smaller anti-influenza activity and were much more
cytotoxic.
neuraminidase (N1), A/Puerto Rico/8/34 and A/California/07/09.
Similarly, it effectively inhibited the virus A/Singapore/1/57 but
appeared ineffective against A/Aichi/2/68, although they both have
the same type of neuraminidase, N2. The target of (4R)-11a, there-
fore, should not be identified as M2 or NA, suggesting a novel, pre-
viously unexplored, mechanism of influenza-inhibiting action.
Based on the data presented, the anti-influenza activity of the
compounds may depend on the type of hemagglutinin (HA). It
was shown previously that all influenza virus hemagglutinins can
be divided into two major groups.31 Among the influenza A viruses
tested, viruses of H1, H2 and H5 subtypes belong to the group 1,
while viruses of H3 and H7 subtypes belong to the group 2. With
two exceptions (A/Vladivostok/02/09 and A/mallard/Pennsylva-
nia/10218/84 viruses), the range of activity of (4R)-11a corre-
sponds to subdivision of HAs into groups. Indeed, it is effective
against viruses of H1 and H2 subtypes (group 1) and ineffective
against those of subtypes H3 and H7 (group 2).
In addition, (4R)-11a appeared to be effective against influenza
B virus. This suggests that it may either bind to similar sites of HAs
of influenza A and influenza B viruses or use another protein of
viral or cellular origin as a target. Further experiments should be
definitely performed to completely characterize the range of activ-
ity and target(s) of the compounds belonging to this class.
To further study the mode of activity of (4R)-11a we performed
time-of-addition experiments where the compound was added to
the replicating virus at different time points corresponding to dif-
ferent stages of viral life cycle. As presented in Fig. 2, the com-
pound was most effective in suppressing the viral replication
when administered at early stages of the viral cycle (0–2 h post
infection). This additionally confirms that the activity of (4R)-11a
may be directed to viral hemagglutinin which is essential at early
stages of viral cycle, namely for viral attachment to cell surface and
membrane fusion.
The number of aliphatic substituents at the C(2) position is
another factor having an apparent effect on biological properties
of octahydro-2H-chromenols. Thus, (4R)-23b synthesized via inter-
action between cyclohexanecarbaldehyde 22b and isopulegol 7
exhibited a moderate antiviral activity in combination with high
cytotoxicity, resulting in very low selectivity index, while (4R)-
23a derived from butyraldehyde 22a showed no antiviral activity
at all. Hence, two substituents need to be present at the C(2) posi-
tion in octahydrochromenols such as 11 and 17 to ensure the
emergence of antiviral activity.
Activity against other types of influenza virus, including viruses
of A and B types, of human and avian origin and differing in their
susceptibility to antivirals, was tested for (4R)-11a, which exhib-
ited the highest activity against type A virus (A/Puerto Rico/8/34
(H1N1) strain) (Table 2).
The results demonstrate that (4R)-11a possesses an activity
against a wide range of influenza viruses independently of their
resistance or susceptibility to rimantadine. Thus, it exhibits the
equally high levels of activity against both rimantadine-resistant
and rimantadine-sensitive strains A/California/07/09 and A/Singa-
pore/1/57. Nevertheless, it appeared inactive against three other
rimantadine-sensitive strains A/Vladivostok/02/09, A/Aichi/2/68
and A/mallard/Pennsylvania/10218/84. Moreover, it did not inhibit
the oseltamivir-resistant strain A/Vladivostok/02/09 but was
highly effective against other viruses with the same subtype of
Fig. 2. Activity of (4R)-11a against influenza virus A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1)
according to time-of-addition experiment.