Scheme 2
for 30 min provided the pentalene derivative 2 in 81% yield
yields (entries 1 and 2, Table 1). Methyl maleic anhydride
and 1 did not react in benzene at reflux; however, microwave
irradiation provided adduct 8 in 63% yield (entry 3, Table
1). Unfortunately, we could not get γ-butyrolactone and 1
to react. In this case, the use of Lewis acids such as BF3‚
Et2O, AlCl3, EtAlCl2, TiCl4, etc. gave decomposition of
fulvene and no other product (entry 4, Table 1). Reaction of
the methylaminofulvene with 2-cyclopentenone did not give
any reaction either (starting materials were recovered).
However, the 1,4-alkylation adduct 10 (ca. 1:1 ratio of
regioisomers) was obtained in the presence of catalytic
amounts of BF3‚Et2O at -78 °C (entry 5, Table 1).
Interestingly, reaction of aminofulvene and 2-cyclopen-
tenone with 1 equiv of BF3‚Et2O (reflux, 240 min) afforded
the tricyclic product 11 in 65% yield (entry 6, Table 1).
Milder conditions could be used for 6-dimethylaminofulvene
(1 equiv of BF3‚Et2O, 50 °C) to provide the tricyclic product
12 in 75% yield (entry 6, Table 1). Cyclopenta[a]pentalene
adducts 11 and 12 are structural analogues of biologically
active natural products incarnal,15 pleurotellol,16 ceratopi-
canol,17 and hypnophilin.
as the only isolable product, (entry 1, Table 1). The structure
1
of 2 was assigned on the basis of IR, H and 13C NMR,
COSY, DEPT, HMQC, HMBC, MS, and HRMS analysis.
This dramatic difference in the chemoselectivity between
6-dimethylaminofulvene (1) and alkylfulvenes may be due
to an increase in the electron density of the 6-dimethylami-
nofulvene π-system. The formation of 2 may be rationalized
by the stepwise mechanism shown in Scheme 2. Initial
addition of 1 to maleic anhydride generates the zwitterionic
intermediate. This is followed by nucleophilic attack at the
C-6 position of fulvene to give the pentalene derivative 2.
A series of homologous maleic anhydrides and maleimide
were then reacted with various aminofulvenes to give the
corresponding products 3-9 (entries 1-4, Table 1).13 Reac-
tion of 1 with maleimide afforded adduct 5. The structure
of 5 was unambiguously assigned by single-crystal X-ray
analysis (Figure 1).14
Reaction of dimethylaminofulvene with dimethyl acetylene-
dicarboxylate and methyl propiolate provided the dimethyl-
amine adducts 1318 and 1419 (entries 7 and 8, Table 1). A
plausible mechanism for this transformation is shown in
Scheme 3. Michael addition of the fulvene amino group to
the triple bond followed by hydrolysis during workup affords
2-dimethylaminomaleic acid dimethylester 13.
In summary, a novel one-pot [6 + 2] cycloaddition of
fulvenes to maleic anhydride, maleimide, and cyclopentenone
has been reported. This constitutes a novel methodology for
Figure 1. ORTEP plots for X-ray crystal structures of 5.
(13) All new compounds were characterized by full spectroscopic (1H
and 13C NMR, DEPT, IR, MS, and HRMS) data. Most of them have COSY
and HMQC data. Yields refer to spectroscopically and chromatographically
homogeneous (>95%) materials.
(14) Crystallographic data for 5: C11H9NO2, M ) 187.19, monoclinic,
space group P21/c, T ) 293 K, a ) 13.6525(16) Å, b ) 8.1225(9) Å, c )
8.4007(10) Å, â ) 97.529(2)°, V ) 923.54(19) Å3, Z ) 4, D ) 1.346
g/cm3, λ (Mo KR) ) 0.71073 Å, 5577 reflections collected, 2114 unique
reflections, 127 parameters refined on F2, R ) 0.0661, wR2[F2] ) 0.2174
[1823 data points with F2 > 2σ(F2)].
(15) Isolated from Gloeostereum incarnatum, with antibacterial activity;
see: Takazawa, H.; Kashino, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 555-557.
(16) Isolated from Pleurotellus hypnophilus, with antibacterial activity;
see: Giannetti, B. M.; Steffan, B.; Steglich, W.; Kupka, J.; Anke, T.
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 3587-3593.
(17) Isolated from the fungus Ceratocystis piceae Ha 4/82; see: Hanssen,
H.-P.; Abraham, W.-R. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 2175-2180.
(18) (a) Schwan, A. L.; Warkentin, J. Can. J. Chem. 1988, 66, 1686-
1694. (b) Guzman, A.; Romero, M.; Talamas, F. X.; Villena, R.;
Greenhouse, R.; Muchowski, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2470-2483.
(19) Roessler, U.; Blechert, S.; Steckhan, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
7075-7078.
Reaction of various aminofulvenes with maleic anhydride
and maleimide gave similar adducts 3,4 and 6,7 in good
(12) (a) Butler, D. N.; Margetic, D.; O’Neill, P. J. C.; Warrener, R. N.
Synlett 2000, 10, 98-100. (b) Klaerner, F.-G.; Breitkopf, V. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 11, 2757-2762. (c) Lonergan, D. G.; Deslongchamps, G.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 14041-14052. (d) Nair, V.; Anilkumar, G.;
Radhakrishnan, K. V.; Sheela, K. C.; Rath, N. P Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
17361-17372. (e) Nair, V.; Nair, A. G.; Radhakrishnan, K. V.; Nandaku-
mar, M. V.; Rath, N. P. Synlett 1997, 7, 767-768. (f) Lonergan, D. G.;
Riego, J.; Deslongchamps, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6109-6112. (g)
Gugelchuk, M. M.; Chan, P. C.-M.; Sprules, T. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
7723-7731. (h) Ho, T.-L.; Yeh, W.-L.; Yule, J.; Liu, H.-J. Can. J. Chem.
1992, 70, 1375-1384. (i) Chou, T.-C.; Jiang, T.-S.; Hwang, J.-T.; Lin, C.-
T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 4165-4168. (j) Roth, W. R.; Bartmann,
M.; Maier, G.; Reisenauer, H. P.; Sustmann, R. Angew. Chem. 1987, 99,
271-272.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 13, 2002
2251