CHROMATO–MASS SPECTROMETRIC IDENTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL PRODUCTS
13
applied specimen volume 10 µL, column thermostat
temperature 30°С. Separation regime II: column
without stirring during 1 day; no oxidation products
were detected in the mixture. Aqueous solution of
ammonia (10%) was added to рН ~10, and air was
bubbled through the solution during 1 h. Prior to the
analysis, the specimens were acidified with formic acid
(about 0.1%) to рН ~3. To exclude the signals of the
admixtures as well as minor or unstable components,
the starting substrate concentration in the solution was
varied.
(
100×2.1 mm) Acquity UPLC HSS T3 (sorbent
particles size 1.8 µm), pre-column filled with the same
sorbent, gradient elution with mobile phases A (water–
acetonitrile–formic acid, 99 : 1 : 0.1) and B (water–
acetonitrile–formic acid, 10 : 90 : 0.1). Content of
phase B in the eluent was linearly increased from 20 to
9
0% during 20 min, kept constant during 4 min, and
then decreased to 20% during 1 min, and the column
was conditioned during 2 min. Eluent flow rate (рН ~
Samples preparation and oxidation conditions for
quercetin has been described elsewhere [6].
2
–3) 0.2 mL/min, applied specimen volume 10 µL,
column thermostat temperature 30°С.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mass-spectrometric detection of the products of
-isopropylphenol and quercetin oxidation was
4
Authors are grateful to the directorate of Research
Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and
Human Ecology, Federal Medico-Biological Agency
of Russia (St. Petersburg) for the opportunity to
perform the experiments.
performed using a Bruker amaZON ETD spectrometer
with ions trap (Germany) under electrospray ionization
conditions in the positive and negative ions detection
modes. Voltage on the capillary –4.8 kV, nitrogen as
drying gas, 250°С, flow rate 9 L/min, mass scan range
REFERENCES
7
0–1000 Da. Each spectrum was obtained by
averaging five sequential scans. The detection was
performed using the total ion current (AutoMS) as well
as by isolation and fragmentation of ions with pre-
selected masses (MRM).
1
. Zenkevich, I.G., Ishchenko, E.N., Makarov, V.G.,
Makarova, M.N., and Selezneva, A.I., Russ. J. Gen.
Chem., 2008, vol. 78, no. 9, p. 1682. doi 10.1134/
S1070363208090077
Linear-logarithmic retention indices for the 4-iso-
propylphenol oxidation products in regimes I and II
were calculated using retention times of the reference
2
. Rosal, R., Rodriguez, A., Perdigon-Melon, J.A., Petre, A.,
and Garcia-Calvo, E., Chem. Eng. J., 2009, vol. 149,
nos. 1–3, p. 311.
components: acetophenone [t 13.0 min (I) and 8.4 min
3. Cory, R.M., McNeill, K., Cotner, J.P., Amado, A.,
Purcell, J.M., and Marshall, A.G., Environ. Sci.
Technol., 2010, vol. 44, no. 10, p. 3683. doi 10.1021/
es902989y
R
(
II)], propiophenone [15.7 min (I) and 11.4 min (II)],
and butyrophenone [17.9 min (I) and 13.7 min (II)].
Aqueous solution of thiourea was used to estimate the
retention time of non-adsorbed component [t 2.1 min
4. Zenkevich, I.G., Ishchenko, E.V., Makarov, A.A., and
Sonchik, O.E., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2010, vol. 80,
no. 13, p. 2671. doi 10.1134/S1070363210130013
0
(
I) and 1.5 min (II)]. The calculations were performed
using a QBasic program.
5
. Zenkevich, I.G., Eschenko, A.Yu., Makarova, S.V.,
Vitenberg, A.G., and Dobryakov, Yu.G., Utsal, V.A.,
Molecules, 2007, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 654. doi
Hydrophobicity parameters (log P) used to
determine the elution order of the components were
calculated using ACD/Labs software. The energies of
formation were simulated using the ММ+ and АМ-1
methods implemented in HyperChem Pro 6.0 software.
1
0.3390/12030654
. Zenkevich, I.G. and Pushkareva, T.I., J. Anal. Chem.
Russ.), 2017, vol. 72, no. 10, p. 1062. doi 10.1134/
S1061934817080147
6
(
Preparation 4-isopropylphenol solutions and the
oxidation with dissolved air oxygen. Solutions of
7. Sangster, J., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1989, vol. 18,
4
6
1
-isopropylphenol {Sigma-Aldrich, mp 60–61°С (mp
no. 3, p. 1111. doi 10.1063/1.555833
2–63°С [22]), pK 10.25} with concentration 0.77–
8. Zenkevich, I.G., Makarov, A.A., Schrader, S., Moeder, M.,
J. Chromatogr. (A), 2009, vol. 1216, p. 4097. doi
10.1016/j.chroma.2009.03.021
a
.0 mg/mL in a mixture of aqueous solution of
NH HCO (25 mM., рН ≈ 8.5) and acetonitrile (80 : 20
4
3
v/v) were prepared. After bubbling air through 100 mL
of the solution (~2 L/min) during 4 h under scattered
luminescent illumination, the solution was kept in air
9
. Zenkevich, I.G., Rotaru, K.I., Selivanov, S.I., and
Kostikov, R.R., Vestn. S.Peterburg. Gos. Univ., Ser.
Fiz.-Khim., 2015, vol. 2 (60), no. 4, p. 386.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 88 No. 1 2018