Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Table 3
Fig. 1 (-)-Securinine and asperparaline A (1).
(i) 300% DLP, 1,2-DCE/–MeOH, reflux (ii) mCPBA, BF3?OEt2,
CH2Cl2
Table 2
Entry
X
Yield (13) (ratio)
Yield (14) (ratio)
1
2
3
S
no reaction
degradation
34% (1 : 1)
—
—
79%
N–Me
N–Ts
In this preliminary study, we have further briefly examined
replacing the furan moiety by other aromatic systems such as a
thiophene or a pyrrole (Table 3). No identifiable reaction took
place with the thiophene but the radical spirocyclisation was
observed with the pyrrole, as long as an electron withdrawing
group was placed on the nitrogen. A simple methyl group only led
to degradation, presumably because of the instability of the
primary spiro adduct. In summary, we have developed a new
radical spirocyclisation onto furans which uses tin-free radical
chemistry and exploits the possibility of a cross-over from a radical
to a polar manifold. This reaction gives access to new spirocyclic
and heterocyclic structures, some of which could be used in the
synthesis of a number of alkaloids containing such subunits.{
(i) 180–210% DLP, 1,2-DCE–MeOH, reflux (ii) mCPBA, BF3?OEt2,
CH2Cl2
Entry
n
Yield (6) (ratio)
Yield (7) (ratio)
1
2
3
a
0
1
2
6a 65% (3 : 3 : 1 : 1)
6b 48% (1 : 1 : 1 : 1)
6c 50% (1 : 1 : 1 : 1)a
b
7a 68% (3 : 1)
7b 65% (1 : 1)a
7c 74% or 46%b
Separable diastereoisomers.
These yields correspond to the
oxidation of the separated pairs of diastereoisomers 6c.
The two major diastereoisomers gave only one isomer after
oxidation. 2D NOESY experiments indicated a relative configu-
ration where the R2 group is anti to the furan oxygen.
We applied this approach to the expedient synthesis of the
tricyclic A,B,D system of securinine (Fig. 1) and analogues.10,11
This system was obtained in good yield in the case of a 5, 6 and
7-membered ring A but unfortunately with little or no selectivity
(Table 2).
Notes and references
{ Typical experimental procedures.
Radical spirocyclisation. A solution of the xanthate (1 mmol) in 1,2-
dichloroethane and methanol (3 : 1, 5 mL) was heated to reflux for 15 min
under a nitrogen atmosphere. Lauroyl peroxide (10 mol%) was then added
every 1 h until complete consumption of the xanthate was observed. The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue purified by
chromatography on a silica gel column (ethyl acetate–petroleum ether) to
furnish the desired product.
Oxidation of the cyclic acetal lactone. A solution of mCPBA (1.1 mmol)
in dichloromethane (2 mL) was added to a solution of the acetal (1 mmol)
in dichloromethane (4 mL) at 220/215 uC followed by BF3?OEt2
(1.1 mmol). When TLC indicated complete transformation, the reaction
was quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution and extracted twice with
dichloromethane. The combined organic extracts were dried over MgSO4,
filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by
chromatography on a silica gel column (ethyl acetate–petroleum ether) to
furnish the desired product.
As some natural compounds, such as the potent insecticidal
asperparalines12 (Fig. 1), possess a spirocyclic imide function, we
replaced the amide with an imide group. Unfortunately, the results
were not very satisfactory (Scheme 3). In the case of a methyl
group on the nitrogen (8a), a competing hydrolysis of the imide by
methanol occurred to give amide 9. The use of a less nucleophilic
solvent such as t-BuOH, CF3CH2OH or AcOH did not improve
the result. With a bulkier iso-propyl group (8b) on the nitrogen, the
product of hydrolysis was not observed but the improvement in
the overall yield of the reaction remained modest.
1 J. Boivin, M. Yousfi and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 5985;
H. Ohno, S.-I. Maeda, M. Okumura, R. Wakayama and T. Tanaka,
Chem. Commun., 2002, 316; F. Gonzalez-Lopez de Turiso and
D. P. Curran, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 151.
2 K. Jones, T. C. T. Ho and J. Wilkinson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36,
6743; C. Escolano and K. Jones, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 8951;
C. Escolano and K. Jones, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 1453.
3 S. T. Hilton, T. C. T. Ho, G. Pljevaljcic and K. Jones, Org. Lett., 2000,
2, 2639.
4 A. S. Kyei, K. Tchabanenko, J. E. Baldwin and R. M. Adlington,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 8931.
5 P. J. Parsons, M. Penverne and I. L. Pinto, Synlett, 1994, 721;
A. Demircan and P. J. Parsons, Synlett, 1998, 1215; A. Demircan and
P. J. Parsons, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2003, 1729.
6 F. Gagosz, C. Moutrille and S. Z. Zard, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 2707.
7 J. Mihelcic and K. D. Moeller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 9106 and
references there cited.
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (i) Lauroyl peroxide (DLP), 1,2-
DCE–MeOH, reflux (ii) mCPBA, BF3?OEt2, CH2Cl2, 220/215 uC.
8 S. F. Martin and S. K. Bur, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 7641.
9 P. Jarglis and F. W. Lichtenthaler, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23, 3781.
666 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 665–667
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006