C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
hydrophobic polystyrene tail, which is attached without the help
of a hydrophilic spacer. In addition, upon aggregation of the giant
amphiphiles from fibers to bundles of fibers, fewer active sites of
the enzyme molecules will remain accessible to substrate mol-
ecules.18
In conclusion, we have shown that monodispersed and precisely
defined giant amphiphiles consisting of an enzyme covalently
connected to a single hydrophobic polymeric tail can be prepared
and induced to self-assemble in a fashion similar to that of low-
molecular weight amphiphiles. Further studies are directed at
investigating the influence of different polymer tails (i.e., poly-
styrenes of different lengths with different hydrophilic spacer groups
for attachment to the enzyme) upon the activity and the self-
assembling behavior of the giant amphiphiles.
Figure 2. Surface pressure/surface area isotherms recorded in a Langmuir-
Blodgett trough using a subphase containing 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH
6.8), T ) 20 °C. (I) CAL B, (II) reaction mixture of polystyrene-maleimide
and native CALB, (III) the giant amphiphile formed in the monolayer, and
(IV) the giant amphiphile formed in THF/water system.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the EC TMR
Sisitomas and Smarton programs. We thank Dr. J. J. L. M.
Cornelissen and Dr. N. A. J. M. Sommerdijk for initial discussions
and Novo Nordisk A/S for the generous donation of the lipase.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental Section (PDF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Feiters, M. C.; Nolte, R. J. M. AdVances in Supramolecular Chemistry;
Gokel, G. W., Ed.; Jai Press Inc.: Stamford CT, 2000; Vol. 6, pp 41-
156.
(2) Hannink, J. M.; Cornelissen, J. J. L. M.; Farrera, J. A.; Foubert, P.; De
Schryver, F. C.; Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M.; Nolte, R. J. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4732-4734.
Figure 3. TEM images (Pt shadowing) of the aggregates obtained after
mixing reduced CAL B in water with maleimide-terminated polystyrene,
in THF/water (9/1 v/v) mixture (A, B). The insert (B) shows µm long
bundles of fibers, with the smallest fiber (C) having a diameter of ∼ 25
nm corresponding to a micellar rod (D).
(3) Shei, H.; Eisenberg, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3310-3312.
(4) (a) Gitsov, I.; Wooley, K. L.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1992, 31, 1200. (b) Cornelissen, J. J. L. M.; Fisher, M.; Sommerdijk,
N. A. J. M.; Nolte, R. J. M. Science 1998, 280, 1427-1430. (c) Hest, J.
C. M. v.; Baars, M. W. P. L.; Delnoye, D. A. P.; Genderen, M. H. P. v.;
Meijer, E. W. Science 1995, 268, 1592-1595.
monodispersed in THF solutions with up to 10% water content.15
The reaction was performed in a THF solution of maleimide-
polystyrene (0.03 mM) to which the reduced enzyme in water (0.015
mM, 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM
NaCl) was added to give a final water content of 8%. The reaction
was allowed to proceed overnight, and then additional water was
slowly added over a period of ∼2 h.16 TEM studies of the resulting
reaction mixture revealed the presence of well-defined µm-long
fibers (Figure 3A,B). Closer examination of these fibers showed
that they were built up from bundles of rods, with the smallest rod
having a diameter between 25 and 30 nm (Figure 3C). The size of
the smallest rod corresponds closely to the predicted diameter of a
micellar architecture formed by the self-assembly of the giant
amphiphile (Figure 3D).17 It is remarkable that these giant am-
phiphiles exhibit self-assembling properties similar to those of their
low-molecular weight counterparts.
These giant amphiphiles were also spread at the air-water
interface of a Langmuir-Blodgett trough. The ∼28 nm2 lift-off
area measured after compression of the monolayer (Figure 2, IV),
further verifies the formation of the biohybrids.
Preliminary catalytic studies were carried out on the self-
assembled fibers using the pro-fluorescent substrate 6,8-difluoro-
4-methylumbelliferyl octanoate (DiFMU-octanoate). The activities
of the native lipase and the reduced lipase were also determined
for comparison (see Supporting Information). The lipase retained
∼70% of its initial activity after the disulfide reduction step. In
contrast, the fibers exhibited only 6-7% of this activity. This
decrease in activity can probably be ascribed to destabilization of
the active conformation of the enzyme due to the presence of the
(5) (a) Schulze, B.; Wubbolts, M. G. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999, 10, 609-
615. (b) Schmid, R. D.; Verger, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
1608-1633.
(6) Uppenberg, J.; Hansen, M. T.; Patkar, S.; Jones, T. A.; Structure (London),
1994, 2, 293-308.
(7) Rotticci, D.; Ottosson, J.; Norin, T.; Hult K. Methods in Biotechnology;
Halling, P., Vulfson, E., Woodley, J., Holland, B., Eds.; Humana Press:
Totowa, NJ, 2001; Vol. 15, pp 261-276.
(8) The native enzyme contains additional disulfide bridges, which are buried
in the inner shell.
(9) Ellman, G. L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82, 70-77.
(10) Trost, B. M.; Kallander, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5427-5435.
(11) Kempin, U.; Hennig, L.; Knoll, D.; Welzel, P.; Muller, D.; Markus, A.;
Heijenoort J. v. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 17669-17690.
(12) Thionitrobenzoate (TNB-), which is formed upon reaction of Ellman’s
reagent with a sulfhydryl group, has an intense absorption band at 412
nm (ꢀ ) 14150 M-1 cm-1) which allowed an accurate detection of the
free sulfhydryls after the reduction step (see Supporting Information).
(13) The addition of only one maleimide is thought to be the result of steric
hindrance.
(14) Unlike in the case of low-molecular weight amphiphiles where sonification
is often used to aid self-aggregation, this approach could not be used for
these molecules, since sonification destroys the enzyme.
(15) Yu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Eisenberg, A. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 1144-1154.
(16) The formation of the giant amphiphile was confirmed by SEC chroma-
tography, electrophoresis, and UV titrations (see Supporting Information).
(17) Calculations using the Israellachvilli’s rules predict for the assembly a
spherical micellar architecture (P ) 0.04). These calculations, however,
do not allow one to discriminate between spherical and rodlike micelles
because the precise volume of the polystyrene tail and the diameter of
the enzyme group are not known.
(18) According to simple calculations, if a hexagonal packing is assumed, seven
rods when assembled have only 40% of their surface area accessible to
substrate molecules. If larger assemblies are formed, this value drops
further. Hence, it is not unreasonable to assume that upon aggregation
the catalytic activity drops considerably.
JA017809B
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 16, 2002 4225