DIRECT PHOTODEGRADATION OF TRIAZINE HERBICIDES
503
REFERENCES
1. The Agrochemical Handbook (3rd edn). Royal Society of
Chemistry: Cambridge, 1994.
2. Hileman B. Chem. Eng. News 1996: 23.
3. Belluck DA, Benjamin SL, Dawson T. In Pesticide Transforma-
tion Products. Fate and Significance in the Environment,
Somasundaram L, Coats JR (Eds). American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 1991.
4. Bonnet MC, Welte B, Montiel A, Dore M. Environ. Technol. 1991;
12: 217.
5. de Laat J, Dore M, Suty H. Rev. Sci. Eau 1995; 8: 23.
6. Acero JL, Stemmler K, von Gunten U. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2000; 34: 591.
7. Arnold SM, Hickey WJ, Harris RF. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995;
29: 2083.
8. Larson RA, Schlauch MB, Marley KA. J. Agric. Food. Chem.
1991; 39: 2057.
9. Balmer ML, Sulzberger B. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999; 33: 2418.
10. He´quet V, Gonza´lez C, Le Cloirec P. Water Res. 2001; 35: 4253.
11. Pelizzetti W, Carlin V, Minero C, Gra¨tzel M. New J. Chem. 1991;
15: 351.
12. Hiskia A, Ecke M, Troupis A, Kokorakis A, Henig H,
Papaconstantinou E. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001; 35: 2358.
13. Cui H, Hwang H-M, Zeng K, Glover H, Yu H, Liu Y.
Chemosphere 2002; 991.
Scheme 3. Mechanism of photodegradation proposed for
compound 3
of the heterocyclic ring, thus facilitating a potential
dealkylation of the alkyl side-chains. Therefore, it is
possible that dealkylation is a relatively minor route with
this excitation source (254 nm), resulting from some
dissociative pathway ocurring at higher excitation
energies. Joint experimental and theoretical studies are
in progress in order to compare the effects of different
excitation wavelengths to test this and to analyse in detail
the reaction mechanism.
14. He´quet V, Cloirec PL, Gonza´lez C, Meunier B. Chemosphere
2000; 41: 379.
15. Angelini G, Bucci R, Carnevaletti F, Colosimo M. Radiat. Phys.
Chem. 2000; 59: 303.
16. Burrows H, Canle LM, Santaballa JA, Steenken S. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. B 2002; 67: 71.
17. Schmidt S, Mattusch J, Werner G. Z. Chem. 1989; 29: 239.
18. Torrents A, Anderson BG, Bilboulian S, Johnson WE, Hapeman
CJ. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997; 31: 1476.
19. Sanlaville Y, Schmitt P, Mansour M, Meallier P. Fresenius’
Environ. Bull. 1997; 6: 418.
CONCLUSION
20. Dean JR, Wade G, Barnabas IJ. J. Chromatogr. A 1996; 733: 295.
21. Lide DR (Ed). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: a Ready-
reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data. CRC Press: Boca
Raton, FL, 2000.
Compounds 1–3 undergo 254 nm-initiated photodegra-
dation, leading to 4 as one of the main photoproducts, as
shown by HPLC. Dealkylation products were also
observed by GC–MS in the case of 2, and 4-ethyl-
amino-6-isopropylamino-(1,3,5)-triazine in the case of 3.
An addition–elimination mechanism is proposed for 1–3,
leading to 4, which would subsequently undergo photo-
degradation. The observed order of reactivity upon
irradiation is 1 > 3 > 4 > 2, in accordance with the
electron availability at position C-2. No linear free
energy relationship was found between the observed rate
constants and substituents inductive or steric effect.
22. Schmitt P, Poiger T, Simon R, Freitag D, Kettrup A, Garrison AW.
Anal. Chem. 1997; 69: 2559.
23. Fahey RC, Newton GL. Methods Enzymol. 1987; 143: 85.
24. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA,
Cheeseman JR, Zakrzewski VG, Montgomery JA, Stratmann RE,
Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain
MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci
B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA,
Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck AD,
Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Ortiz JV, Stefanov
BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaroni I, Gomperts R,
Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY,
Nanayakkara A, Gonza´lez C, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson
BG, Chen W, Wong MW, Andre´s JL, Head-Gordon M, Replogle
ES, Pople JA. Gaussian 98. Gaussian: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
25. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Phys. Rev. B 1988; 37: 785.
26. Becke AD. J. Chem. Phys. 1993; 98: 5648.
Acknowledgements
27. Pape BE, Zabik J. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 1970; 18: 202.
28. Mason SF. J. Chem. Soc. 1959; 1240.
29. Marcheterre L, Choudhry GG, Webster GRB. Environ. Contam.
Toxicol. 1988; 103: 61.
30. Ferna´ndez Pe´rez MI. PhD Thesis, Departamento de Qu´ımica F´ısica
e Enxen˜er´ıa Qu´ımica I, Universidade da Corun˜a, 2002.
31. Martins LJA, Kemp TJ, Formosinho SJ, Branco JS, Fernandes
MM. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1991; 87: 3617.
32. Azenha MEDG, Burrows HD, Canle LM, Coimbra R, Ferna´ndez
MI, Rodr´ıgues AE, Santaballa JA, Steenken S. Chem. Commun.
2003; 112.
R.C. acknowledges an EU Socrates–Erasmus grant
received to stay in A Corun˜a. M.I.F. and M.A.P. worked
under contract within research projects PPQ2000-0449-
C02-01 and the Acciones Integradas bilateral program
HP1999-0078 of the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologı´a
(Spain) and PGIDTOOMAM10303PR of the Secretarı´a
Xeral de Investigacio´n e Desenvolvemento, Xunta de
Galicia (Spain), respectively. We also acknowledge the
Centro de Supercomputacio´n de Galicia for providing
computing facilities and Dr. F. Ferna´ndez for technical
support.
33. Kerr JA. Chem. Rev. 1966; 66: 465.
34. Barcelo´ D, Durand G, de Bertrand N, Albaige´s J. Sci. Total
Environ. 1993; 132: 283.
Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2003; 16: 498–503