T. Pigot et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 4047–4050
4049
inhomogeneous insertion of 4-BB in the host structure,
and, probably, remaining nonintercalated zones.
structure, some 4-BB is found in acetonitrile (5%)
contrary to the blank experiments. This exchange
is closely related to the initial concentration of sul-
fide, since with more concentrated DBS solutions
(10 mol L ), greater amounts of 4-BB are released
in solution (42%) upon irradiation. This can be
accounted for by surface exchange between 4-BB
and formed sulfate and sulfonate as suggested by
the XPS analysis of the irradiated 4-BB/HT1.
Photo-oxidation experiments are performed both in
solution and in the gas phase. In the first case, 10 mL of
ꢀ
1
ꢀ1
ꢀ
2
ꢀ1
1
.15 ꢁ 10 mol L
di n-dibutylsulfide (DBS) aceto-
nitrile solutions containing 30 mg of the solid photo-
catalyst and cyclododecane as internal standard in a
Pyrex reactor are used. The stirred slurry is continuously
bubbled with pure oxygen and irradiated with four
(3) Third, 4-BB/HT1 appears much more selective
towards sulfoxide formation and only minor
amounts of disulfide, sulfone and acidic compounds
are obtained. In both homogeneous and hetero-
geneous case, it may be noticed that sulfone is
mainly observed at long irradiation time. It is
known from previous studies that disulfides and
acids arise, respectively, from the dimerization or
from the oxidation by ground state oxygen of thiyl
â
fluorescent 350 nm lamps in a RAYONET device.
After filtration, the composition of the irradiated solu-
tion is determined by GC-FID for volatile compounds,
by ion exchange chromatography for acidic species and
by UV spectrometry in order to check the possible
presence of 4-BB in solution.
In the second case, preliminary attempts were performed
with a fluidized bed of 4-BB/HT1 in a 20 mL Pyrex
vertical reactor (500 mg of 4-BB/HT1). The gaseous
effluent (100 ppmv of dimethylsulfide (DMS)) is con-
tinuously introduced at a constant flow (250 mL/mn).
The gas flow at the outlet of the reactor is analyzed each
seven minutes with a GC-FID chromatograph with an
automatic injection loop.
2
radicals. Moreover, it has been shown that under
benzophenone sensitization, both electron transfer
Åþ
Åꢀ
(with formation of an ion-pair RSR , O ) and sin-
7
glet oxygen addition to sulfides are competitive.
Our results thus strongly suggest that the electron
transfer mechanism, which is only able to lead to
acidic products, is less favored with the lamellar
material. This may be tentatively accounted for by
Åþ
In acetonitrile solution, blank experiments without sul-
fide indicate that the lamellar structure is preserved
under irradiation in the presence of oxygen and that less
than 1% of 4-BB is released in the solution. We first
verified that with this amount of 4-BB in solution, no
oxidation of sulfide occurred under homogeneous con-
ditions. Second, we checked that DBS did not react
when HT0 (without 4-BB) was used. Comparative
photooxidation experiments were then performed with
the unfavorable formation of charged RSR
between the positive brucite sheets.
Finally we examined the turnover of 4-BB/HT1 for
sulfide oxidation. In these experiments, a slurry of the
photocatalyst was irradiated for 150 min. The clay was
then removed by filtration, and the filtrate analyzed.
After washing with acetonitrile, the clay was then re-
used in successive trials. Table 1 shows that 4-BB/HT1 is
active during at least three consecutive runs and that
sulfoxide is always the major product. The formation of
sulfone decreases from the first to the third trial. The
absence of other by-products and the stability of the
amount of 4-BB found in solution after irradiation (5%)
are also noteworthy. After the last run, the catalyst is
removed by filtration. After evaporation of acetonitrile,
the crude product is diluted in a chloroform solution,
washed with a carbonate aqueous solution to take off
the released 4-BB, and purified on a silicagel column.
The yield in isolated sulfoxide is 80% (eluent chloro-
form).
3
0 mg of the intercalated materials (corresponding to a
known amount of 4-BB deduced from the microanalysis
data) or with equivalent amounts of 4-benzoyl benzoic
acid (4-BBac) in homogeneous solution (Table 1). Three
main conclusions may be drawn from this table.
(
1) First, the intercalated material reacts more slug-
gishly than soluble 4-BBAc, since after 1 h irradia-
tion, 30% of the sulfide is not converted. This
probably results from the hindered diffusion of the
reactants inside the lamellar structure in the hetero-
geneous case, as already reported with phthalocya-
9
nines intercalated in LDH.
2) Second, although the XRD pattern of the irradiated
(
Some experiments have been attempted towards the gas
phase photo-oxidation of dimethylsulfide (DMS) with
4
-BB/HT1 is still characteristic of a preserved LDH
Table 1. Composition of the solutions after irradiation
b
b
b
b
b
c
Time (h)
1
2
3
4
5
4-BB released
a
4
4
4
4
4
-BBAc
-BB/HT1
1
58
76
74
81
88
2
1
12
1
5
1
0.5
0.1
Nd
Nd
Nd
––
4
a
2
d
d
d
d
d
d
-BB/HT1 (cycle 1)
-BB/HT1 (cycle 2)
-BB/HT1 (cycle 3)
2.5
2.5
2.5
10
6
0
Nd
Nd
Nd
5
0
5
5
0
5
a
b
c
Time for total consumption of sulfide.
%
%
Relative to the initial sulfide concentration.
Released in solution relative to the initial amount of inserted 4-BB.
d
Not determined.