D. D. Rossouw and L. Macheli
N, N0-bis(tert-butyloxycarbonyl)-3-tributylstannylbenzylguanidine reaction was scaled up twice under optimized conditions, a
(
bis-Boc-mTBSBG) 2
two-fold increase of all chemical and radiochemical ingredients
and solvents, including the quantity of water used for Sep-Pak
elutions, was implemented. The quantity of eluant used to elute
the product, however, was not adjusted accordingly.
Bis-Boc-mIBG (35 mg; 0.07 mmol) was dissolved in dry dioxane
(
2 ml). A stream of nitrogen was bubbled through the solution
for 1 min, and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium (8 mg) and
bis(tributyltin) (172 mg; 0.3 mmol) was added. The reaction vial
was again flushed with nitrogen and the mixture was heated in
an oil bath at 1151C for 3 h. The reaction mixture was
subsequently concentrated under a stream of nitrogen with
heating. The concentrated mixture was loaded onto a column
filled with silica gel in hexanes. The column was eluted with
approximately 35 ml hexanes, followed by 25 ml 10% (v/v) ethyl
acetate in hexanes. The product-containing fractions from the
latter eluate were combined and evaporated to dryness to yield
Conclusion
The described optimized method for the production of n.c.a.
123
[
I]mIBG proved to be reliable and results appear to be
reproducible. Radiochemical yields obtained from a Boc-
protected trimethylstannyl precursor were generally higher than
those obtained from its tributylstannyl counterpart. The
described Sep-Pak purification process appears to be robust
up to activity levels of at least 5.3 GBq. Certain features of the
procedure such as the chemical degradation of the precursor
and the selective elution of the degradation products from the
Sep-Pak make a chromatographic separation of the radiola-
belled product from its precursor unnecessary. The results of this
22 mg (47%) of an impure oily product. The latter was combined
with a product from another batch (18 mg) and subjected to
further silica gel purification, using 10% (v/v) ethyl acetate in
1
petroleum ether, to obtain a semi-pure product: H NMR (CDCl )
3
d: 0.86–0.9 (m, 9H, SnBu), 1.01–1.08 (m, 6H, SnBu), 1.26–1.36
123
study suggest that n.c.a [ I]mIBG could be synthesized on a
(
m, 15H, Boc, SnBu), 1.46–1.56 (m, 15H, Boc, SnBu), 5.17 (s, 2H),
GBq scale, using a relatively simple purification procedure. This
should enable medical scientists to embark on more extensive
clinical trials.
7.2–7.45 (m, 4H), 9.45 (br s, 2H). Additional HPLC purification was
carried out by injecting a solution of semi-pure 2 (500 mg) in
methanol (50 ml) on column B and using Method C to elute the
mixture. The product fraction (RT = 16.5 min) was collected
and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen and
slight heating. The residue (approximately 450–500 mg) was
re-dissolved in methanol (50 ml).
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank Messrs S. Dolley and S. Buwa who
assisted with the ICP analysis.
Radiochemistry
123
No-carrier-added [ I]iodine was locally produced by means of
the I(p,5n) Xe! I route, using a 66 MeV proton beam,
and recovered in 0.01 M NaOH. The latter solution was reduced
1
27
123
123
References
[1] W. H. Beierwaltes, Med. Ped. Oncol. 1987, 15, 163.
[2] A. J. McEwan, P. Wyeth, D. Ackery, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1986, 37, 765.
[3] G. Vaidyanathan, M. R. Zalutsky, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1993, 44,
621–628.
in volume approximately 10 times by means of evaporation,
therefore effectively rendering
approximately 0.1M.
a NaOH concentration of
A solution of the respective precursor (50–200 mg) in
methanol (20 ml) was added to glacial acetic acid (200 ml).
[4] G. Vaidyanathan, M. R. Zalutsky, Nucl. Med. Biol. 1995, 22,
1–64.
[5] D. H. Hunter, X. Zhu, J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 1999, 42,
53–661.
6
1
23
A solution of I in approximately 0.1M NaOH (50 ml) was added,
followed by a solution of NCS (100–2000 mg) in glacial acetic acid
6
[
6] M. Knickmeier, P. Matheja, T. Wichter, K. P. Sch a¨ fers, P. Kies, G.
1
23
(
50 ml). When 100 ml I was used, additional acetic acid (100 ml)
was added. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room
temperature and then quenched with a solution of Na
90–1800 mg) in water (45 ml). A small aliquot of the reaction
mixture was withdrawn for routine HPLC analysis. Neat TFA
100 ml) was then added and the mixture stirred and heated in a
Breithardt, O. Schober, M. Sch a¨ fers, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 27,
302–307.
[
7] S. Samnick, J. B. Bader, M. M u¨ ller, C. Chapot, S. Richter, A. Schaefer,
B. Sax, C.-M. Kirsch, Nucl. Med. Commun. 1999, 20, 537–545.
8] G. Vaidyanathan, D. J. Affleck, K. L. Alston, M. R. Zalutsky, J. Label.
Compd. Radiopharm. 2007, 50, 177–182. DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.1243.
2 2 5
S O
(
[
(
[9] H. J. Verberne, K. de Bruin, J. B. A. Habraken, G. Aernout Somsen,
J. L. H. Eersels, F. Moet, J. Booij, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, Eur. J. Nucl.
Med. Mol. Imaging 2006, 33, 483–490. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-
sealed vial at 1101C for 15 min. Another small aliquot was taken
for HPLC analysis, and the reaction mixture subsequently
neutralized with 5 M NaOH (1.1 ml). The mixture was loaded
onto a pre-conditioned Sep-Pak cartridge (500 mg C18) and
passed through, using vacuum. The empty reaction vial was
rinsed with water (4 ml), which was subsequently passed
through the cartridge. The latter was eluted with a further
0022-1.
[
10] G. Vaidyanathan, P. C. Welsh, K. C. Vitorello, S. Snyder,
H. S. Friedman, M. R. Zalutsky, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging
2
004, 31, 1362–1370. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1596-8.
11] G. Vaidyanathan, D. J. Affleck, M. R. Zalutsky, Appl. Radiat. Isot.
005, 62, 435–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.07.001.
[
[
2
12] O. James, R. E. Coleman, Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35(Suppl. 1),
S1:63–S1:76. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.06.002.
14 ml water, followed by a mixture of 0.1% H
3
PO
4
/absolute
ethanol = 75:25 (v/v) (1 ml). The cartridge was subsequently [13] A. C. Donovan, J. F. Valliant, Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35, 741–746.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.07.006.
eluted with a further four to five 1 ml portions of the same
[
[
14] S. M. Moerlein, H. H. Coenen, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 1985,
941–1947.
15] D. M. Wieland, J-L. Wu, L. E. Brown, T. J. Mangner, D. P. Swanson,
mixture. The activities in the individual fractions were counted
and those in the product-containing fractions were expressed as
percentages of the starting activity (decay-corrected). When the
1
W. H. Beierwaltes, J. Nucl. Med. 1980, 21, 349–353.
J. Label Compd. Radiopharm 2009, 52 499–503
Copyright r 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
www.jlcr.org