J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7407-7408
7407
Highly Effective Soluble Polymer-Supported
Catalysts for Asymmetric Hydrogenation
Qing-hua Fan, Chang-yu Ren, Chi-hung Yeung,
Wen-hao Hu, and Albert S. C. Chan*
Union Laboratory of Asymmetric Synthesis and
Department of Applied Biology and
Chemical Technology
Figure 1. The synthesis of chiral polyester-supported BINAP ligands.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniVersity
Hong Kong, China
mixture through the manipulation of several different solvents
including diethyl ether was still inconvenient. A disadvantage of
the use of poly(ethylene glycol) support was that it limited the
binding site of the ligand to the terminals of the polymer and
consequently limited the possible interactions of the polymer
support with the catalyst. In this study, we developed a new type
of polymer-supported catalysts which offered better rate of
reaction than the corresponding monomeric homogeneous catalyst
while retaining the high stereoselectivity. This new approach also
offered opportunities for the study of polymer-catalyst interaction
in the supported chiral phosphine-containing catalysts.9
In choosing a model ligand for this study, we noticed that
among all the known chiral phosphine ligands which had been
studied for asymmetric catalysis, BINAP was probably the most
versatile and effective.10 Both rhodium and ruthenium BINAP
complexes have been extensively studied and several commercial
processes based on these catalysts have been developed.11 An
innovative attempt to immobilize this class of catalysts was the
use of “supported aqueous-phase catalysis” in which the sul-
fonated form of the complex was dissolved in a thin ethylene
glycol film that was adhered to a high-surface-area hydrophilic
support.12 However, the system was restricted in the choice of
possible substrates and solvents, and the supported catalyst showed
lower catalytic activity in comparison to the corresponding “free”
catalyst. Recently, Vankelecom and co-workers13 reported another
approach to immobilized BINAP complexes via the occlusion of
the catalyst in a poly(dimethylsiloxane) membrane. The system,
however, was also restricted in the choice of possible substrates
and showed lower enantioselectivity and activity. In this paper,
we report the first example of the soluble polymer-supported chiral
phosphine-containing catalyst, which showed higher activity
than the corresponding “free” catalyst while retaining the high
stereoselectivity.
ReceiVed October 27, 1998
Homogeneous asymmetric catalysis is one of the most impor-
tant developments in modern chemistry over the past three
decades. Many chiral catalysts are known to exhibit high activities
and enantioselectivities.1 However, a major problem associated
with most homogeneous catalyst systems is the separation and
recycling of the expensive chiral catalyst. A possible solution to
this problem is to “heterogenize” a homogeneous catalyst, either
by anchoring the catalyst on a solid support or by using a liquid-
liquid two-phase system. Over the past two decades, the studies
of insoluble polymer-supported catalysts have attracted much
attention.2,3 Unfortunately, despite the advantage of easy separa-
tion, the use of insoluble polymer-supported catalysts suffered
from lowered catalytic activity and stereoselectivity due to the
restriction of the polymer matrix which resulted in limited mobility
and accessibility of the active sites. The leaching of the noble
metal catalyst from the polymer support was also a significant
problem. Recently, some progress on using polymer-supported
heterogeneous catalysts has been made in the areas such as
asymmetric dihydroxylation,4 epoxidation,5 and hydrogenation.6
However, the significant decline of catalytic activity and/or
enantioselectivity of the catalysts was still the major obstacle of
this approach. Thus the development of a novel polymeric catalyst
with high activity and enantioselectivity without leaching of
catalytic species is highly desirable. For this purpose, we have
designed and developed a highly effective polymer-supported
chiral catalyst by using the concept of “one-phase catalysis and
two-phase separation”. This class of catalysts combines the
advantages of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis: high
catalytic activity and stereoselectivity with easy separation and
convenient recycle of the polymer-supported catalyst from the
reaction mixture. Because of the possible positive influence of
the polymer support on the rate and/or stereoselectivity of the
catalyst, the successful use of soluble polymer as chiral catalyst
support may open up a new area for active research. Recently,
cinchona alkaloid-type ligands were anchored on soluble poly-
(ethylene glycol) and showed similar catalytic activity and
selectivity as compared to the corresponding free catalysts in the
osmium-catalyzed asymmetric dihydroxylation of unfunctional
olefins.7,8 This finding was highly interesting, even though the
separation of the polymer-supported ligands from the reaction
Since BINAP itself cannot be easily attached to a polymer
support, 5,5′-diamino-BINAP (1)14 was used for this study.
Polymer-supported BINAP ligands (2 or 3) were synthesized by
the polycondesation of (S)-1 or (R)-1, terephthaloyl chloride, and
(2S,4S)-pentanediol in the presence of pyridine in 1,2-dichloro-
ethane (Figure 1). A model compound of small molecule 4 (5,5′-
dibenzamido-BINAP) was also synthesized by reacting (S)-1 with
benzoyl chloride in the presence of pyridine in dichloromethane
for the purpose of comparison. The chiral polyester-supported
BINAP ligands (2 or 3) were soluble in common nonprotic organic
solvents such as toluene, THF, and dichrolomethane, but quan-
titatively precipitated upon the addition of methanol. The ligands
(1) Parshall, G. W.; Ittel S. D. Homogeneous catalysis, 2nd ed.; Wiley:
New York, 1992.
(2) Hartley, F. R. Supported metal complexes,; Ugo, R., James, B. R., Eds.;
Reidel: New York, 1985.
1
were characterized by H and 31P NMR. The molecular weights
(3) Shuttleworth, S. J.; Allin, S. M.; Sharma, P. K. Synthesis 1997, 1217-
of the polyester-supported ligands (2 or 3) were determined by
1239.
(4) Song, C. E.; Yang, J. W.; Ha, H. J.; Lee, S.-G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1996, 7, 645-648.
(5) (a) Minutolo, F.; Pini, D.; Petri, A.; Salvadori, P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2293-2302. (b) Minutolo, F.; Pini, D.; Salvadori, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3375-3378.
(9) Fan, Q. H.; Yeung, C. H.; Li, Y. C.; Chan, A. S. C. Abst. Pap. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 213, 219-Inor.
(10) Noyori, R.; Takaya, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 345-350.
(11) Noyori, R. Chemtech 1992, 360-367.
(6) Bayston, D. J.; Fraser, J. L.; Ashton, M. R.; Baxter, A. D.; Polywka,
M. E. C.; Moses, E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3137-3140.
(7) Han, H.; Janda, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7632-7633.
(8) Bolm, C.; Gerlach, A. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 741-
743.
(12) Wan, K. T.; Davis, M. E. Nature 1994, 370, 449-450.
(13) Vankelecom, Ivo. F. J.; Tas, D.; Parton, R. F.; Van de Vyver, V.;
Jacobs, P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1346-1348.
(14) Okano, T.; Kumobayashi, H.; Akutagawa, S.; Kiji, J.; Konishi, H.;
Fukuyama, K.; Shimano, Y. U.S. Patent 4 705 895, 1987
10.1021/ja9837497 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/30/1999