Paper
NJC
value is within 15% of the actual value taken. In addition, the diastereomeric derivatives that can be easily hydrolysed to the
precision determined at each concentration is within 15% of the native enantiomers without racemisation; (ii) for measuring the
coefficient of variation (CV). Regression equations were obtained by success of enantioseparation methods and the synthesis of
plotting graphs of the concentration of the diastereomeric deriva- diastereomers; (iii) for controlling the enantiomeric purity of
tive (x) against the peak area (y) and found to be y = 4.97x + 4721.4 chiral drugs in industrial and analytical laboratories (in particular,
2
2
(
r = 0.99) and y = 4.96x + 4723 (r = 0.99) for the first and second those associated with regulatory agencies); and (iv) for use in
eluted diastereomeric derivative, respectively. The slope, intercept, different stages of enantioselective synthesis as there is generally
relative standard deviation (RSD), recovery, and linearity were a chance of error in establishing the ee of a sample because a
determined using these regression equations.
purification step that employs conventional chromatography prior
The calculated RSD values for the (R,S)- and (S,S)-diastereomeric to loading the sample onto a chiral column may lead to unobserved
29
derivatives were 0.25–0.33% and 0.17–0.25%, respectively, for inter- enantiomeric enrichment.
day assay precision and 0.24–0.41% and 0.22–0.48%, respectively, Although the reported method represents an indirect
for intra-day assay precision. The solutions were considered stable approach to enantioseparation, it is simpler, as separation is
if the deviation from the nominal value was within ꢂ10.0%. The possible on an achiral C18 column with easy optimization of
calculated recoveries for the first and second eluted diastereomeric the chromatographic conditions, and the CR provides highly
derivatives were 99.4–100.6% and 99.2–100.1%, respectively, for the sensitive detector response in comparison with chiral columns,
inter-day assay and 99.4–102.3% and 99.3–102.7%, respectively, for which are highly expensive.
the intra-day assay, respectively (Table S2, given in the ESI†). The
method was inferred to be accurate owing to the very low RSD
values and high percentage recoveries.
Conflicts of interest
The limits of detection and quantification, i.e., the LOD and
LOQ, values were also determined to perform validation studies.
There are no conflicts to declare.
ꢀ
1
LOQs of 11.19 and 9.15 ng mL
3
and LODs of 3.69 and
ꢀ
1
.02 ng mL were found for the diastereomeric derivatives of
Acknowledgements
(R)- and (S)-Ket, respectively. Herein, the LODs are much lower
than the prescribed LOD (1%) in the pharmaceutical industry.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance
received from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research,
New Delhi, India, in the form of a senior research fellowship
4
. Novelty of the present work and
(to Poonam Malik).
conclusion
The enantioseparation of two commonly used drugs, namely,
References
(RS)-Ket and (RS)-Etd, has been achieved by both analytical and
preparative HPLC. Although a preparative HPLC setup may be
considered expensive in comparison with the preparative
separation by conventional open silica gel column chromato-
graphy, the latter is more cumbersome and time-consuming
because it requires verification/analysis of each fraction that is
collected manually.
The present method provides a successful approach for the
easy recovery of the native enantiomers of (RS)-Ket and (RS)-Etd
after their enantioseparation via derivatization. It does not
require a reference standard for comparison of the retention
times and is capable of establishing the true elution order. The
confirmation of the molecular asymmetry of the diastereomeric
derivatives, followed by the verification of the configuration of
the enantiomers recovered from the derivatives, makes this
method superior to those reported in literature in the area of
enantioseparation, where the use of a CR remains limited to
derivatization followed by separation of the diastereomeric
derivatives.
1 S. Alwera and R. Bhushan, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2016, 30,
1223–1233.
2 A. Dalal and R. Bhushan, J. Planar Chromatogr., 2016, 29,
366–371.
3 A. Macario and A. G. Lipman, Pain Med., 2001, 2, 336–351.
4 Modern Pharmacology with Clinical Applications, ed. R. Craig
and R. E. Stitzel, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia,
USA, 6th edn, 2004.
5 M. Lal and R. Bhushan, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2016, 30,
1526–1534.
6 (a) M. Singh and R. Bhushan, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2016, 30,
1728–1732; (b) M. Singh and R. Bhushan, J. Planar Chromatogr.,
2016, 29, 184–189; (c) M. Singh and R. Bhushan, Biomed.
Chromatogr., 2015, 29, 1330–1337.
7 K. S. S. Dossou, E. Farcas, A.-C. Servais, P. Chiap,
B. Chankvetadze, J. Crommen and M. Fillet, J. Chromatogr. A,
2012, 1234, 56–63.
8 I. Matarashvili, D. Ghughunishvili, L. Chankvetadze,
N. Takaishvili, T. Khatiashvili, M. Tsintsadze, T. Farkas
and B. Chankvetadze, J. Chromatogr. A, 2017, 1483, 86–92.
9 O. H. Ismail, A. Ciogli, C. Villani, M. D. Martino, M. Pierini,
A. Cavazzini, D. S. Bell and F. Gasparrini, J. Chromatogr. A,
2016, 1427, 55–68.
This method and approach are useful for both academic and
industrial scientists in all areas of chemical science. The
method is self-contained and comprehensive and also endorses
the future usefulness of the reagents involved. It opens up
areas (i) for the development of new CRs that would yield
New J. Chem.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2017