ChemComm
Communication
sensitivity of 2.78% at 20.0 1C was computed (Fig. 3B). This
value is substantially larger than previously reported fluorescent
ratiometric probes.17,31 The ratiometric response was reproducible
with small standard deviation calculated from ten runs. The
isoemissive point observed at 510 nm clearly reflects the two state
models that govern this system. In addition, the substantial
spectral shift in emission from 520 nm to 450 nm makes the
material ideal for implementation in microscopy imaging setups.
Light could be hence split into two imaging channels to accurately
map temperatures within diffraction limited spots. PPE-CO2 with a
longer polymer chain (108 repeating units) was also prepared
and tested, in complexation with PVP, over the same temperature
range. Upon plotting the ratiometric thermal response versus
temperature, a maximum relative sensitivity of 3.97% was obtained
at 20.0 1C (Fig. S3, ESI†). The results show that irrespective of
the polymer chain length, the PPE-CO2/PVP complex has an
excellent thermal sensitivity.
Fig. 4 Photographic images acquired using a DSLR Nikon 5100 camera
(shutter speed
= 40 ms) for a CPE solution prepared using PVP
(Mw = 55 000) at a 1 : 10 (PPE-CO2-7 : PVP) polymer ratio illuminated with
a UV lamp at 20 1C and 70 1C.
relative sensitivity of 2.78% at 20.0 1C. The shift in the fluorescence
emission was significant to allow practical microscopy imaging at
the nanoscale level. The probe signal was highly reproducible with
no hysteresis and most importantly an off–on signal response. We
believe that this strategy can be easily extended to other conjugated
polyelectrolyte systems. We are currently exploiting the effect of
different PVP molecular weights as well as the effect of the
conjugated polyelectrolyte length.
This work was supported by Lebanese National Council for
Scientific Research (LCNRS #102901) and the University
Research Board (URB #102848) at the American University of
Beirut (AUB). The authors are also thankful for the Kamal A.
Shair Central Research Science Lab (KAS CRSL) of the Faculty of
Arts and Sciences at AUB for providing access to their facilities.
A
common limitation in polymer-based thermometers
is hysteresis which adversely affects the probe performance;
different output signals could be recorded for the same
temperature value during a cycle of heating and cooling.32 In
our case, the ratiometric response was independent of the
cycling direction with a signal repeatability between 98.5%
and 99.8%, at 20.0 1C and 70.0 1C, respectively (Fig. S6, ESI†).
As shown in Fig. 3C, the solid lines are those obtained during
the heating run, and the dashed lines denote the spectra
obtained during the cooling run. A careful look reveals that
the emission intensity slightly increases for the 20.0, 30.0, 40.0
and 50.0 1C during the cooling run possibly due to polymer–CPE
restructuring, but the ratiometric nature of the probe minimizes
the adversity of this effect (Fig. S6, ESI†). At 60.0 1C, the cooling
and heating runs overlap.
Notes and references
1 H. C. Bolton, Evolution of the Thermometer, 1592–1743, The Chemical
Publishing Co., 1900.
2 J. M. Sanchez-Ruiz, Biophys. Chem., 2010, 148, 1–15.
3 S. V. Kumar and P. A. Wigge, Cell, 2010, 140, 136–147.
4 E. M. Lucchetta, J. H. Lee, L. A. Fu, N. H. Patel and R. F. Ismagilov,
Nature, 2005, 434, 1134–1138.
We next investigated the probe stability by performing
multiple testing runs. We recorded spectra at 20.0 1C and
55.0 1C (Fig. 3D). Over the 14 cycles, the probe ratiometric
response showed high reversibility with only 2.5% deviation
from the average at 20.0 1C and 2.1% at 55.0 1C revealing the
lack of hysteresis and a great stability over the two hours and
half of the experiment.
´
5 C. D. Brites, P. P. Lima, N. J. Silva, A. Millan, V. S. Amaral, F. Palacio
and L. D. Carlos, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 4799–4829.
6 Y. Yue and X. Wang, Nano Rev., 2012, 3, 11586.
7 J. Lee and N. A. Kotov, Nano Today, 2007, 2, 48–51.
8 A. I. Hochbaum, R. Chen, R. D. Delgado, W. Liang, E. C. Garnett,
M. Najarian, A. Majumdar and P. Yang, Nature, 2008, 451, 163–167.
9 J.-M. Yang, H. Yang and L. Lin, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 5067–5071.
The signal of most previously reported fluorescent-based
nanothermoeters decreases with the increase of temperature.7,16,23 10 G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, N. Y. Yao, M. Kubo, H. J. Noh, P. K. Lo,
H. Park and M. D. Lukin, Nature, 2013, 500, 54–58.
In sensing, these probes are generally undesirable as the photo-
´
11 F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, A. Zamarron, A. Juarranz de la Fuente, F. Sanz-
destruction of the probe over time might be mistaken for an
increase in temperature. In our case, the ratiometric signal
increases with temperature providing an off–on like sensor. It is
worth mentioning that the addition of PVP provided an enhanced
photostability when compared to pristine PPE-CO2-7 (Fig. S7, ESI†)
and retained its sensitivity even after losing 30% of its original
intensity (Fig. S8 and S9, ESI†). This makes the prepared system
appealing for long term imaging applications.
The change in fluorescence emission was even visible to the
naked eye when the sample was observed under a UV lamp at
20.0 1C and 70.0 1C (Fig. 4).
In conclusion, we have successfully prepared a fluorescent-
based temperature probe that shows a self-referenced ratiometric
´
´
Rodrıguez, L. Martinez Maestro, E. Martın Rodriguez, D. Jaque,
´
´
J. Garcıa Sole and J. A. Capobianco, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 3254–3258.
12 X.-D. Wang, O. S. Wolfbeis and R. J. Meier, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42,
7834–7869.
13 C. Gota, K. Okabe, T. Funatsu, Y. Harada and S. Uchiyama, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 2766–2767.
14 K. Okabe, N. Inada, C. Gota, Y. Harada, T. Funatsu and S. Uchiyama,
Nat. Commun., 2012, 3, 705.
15 J. S. Donner, S. A. Thompson, M. P. Kreuzer, G. Baffou and
R. Quidant, Nano Lett., 2012, 12, 2107–2111.
16 F. Ye, C. Wu, Y. Jin, Y.-H. Chan, X. Zhang and D. T. Chiu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 8146–8149.
17 C.-Y. Chen and C.-T. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 994–996.
18 N. Chandrasekharan and L. A. Kelly, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
9898–9899.
19 A. T. Ngo, P. Karam and G. Cosa, Pure Appl. Chem., 2010, 83, 43–55.
20 K. Li and B. Liu, Polym. Chem., 2010, 1, 252–259.
change in intensity between 20.0 1C and 70.0 1C with a maximum 21 K.-Y. Pu and B. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 3408–3423.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Chem. Commun.