2606
J. Pavlinac et al.
PAPER
tures were analyzed by TLC and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Pure sam-
ples of products were isolated by column chromatography (SiO2;
CH2Cl2 for 1a–6a; 1% EtOH in CH2Cl2 for 7a–12a), followed by
crystallization in the case of solid products, and were identified on
the basis of comparison of their spectroscopic data with the
literature5b,6b,23 or characterized by standard methods.
lent of the reagent. However, conversion to 2,2-diiodo-1-
(1,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-ethanone was not complete and
14% of monoiodinated product 8a was still present in the
reaction mixture after 18 hours at 50 °C in water. More-
over, difficulties during the purification process were en-
countered.
After
two
consecutive
column
chromatographies (SiO2, 1% EtOH in CH2Cl2), 10% of
monoiodinated product 8a was still present along with the
major diiodinated product.
1-(2,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-2-iodoethanone (10a)
Yield: 76%; white crystals (MeOH); mp 48.5–49.5 °C.
IR (KBr): 2995, 2940, 1660, 1490, 1460, 1405, 1325, 1280, 1250,
1220, 1100, 1040, 1010, 880, 840, 815, 730 cm–1.
In conclusion, we feel that several aspects of the method
presented for mild and efficient iodination of dimethoxy-
and trimethoxybenzenes, as well as dimethoxy- and tri-
methoxy-substituted acetophenones, should be stressed.
Firstly, water proved to be suitable for these transforma-
tions. Moreover, the reactivity of otherwise poorly reac-
tive iodine was considerably enchanced by the use of a
30% aqueous solution of H2O2, widely recognized as a
green oxidant, thus avoiding toxic waste as a side-product
of the reaction. Only a catalytic amount of H2SO4 was
needed to activate the oxidizing power of H2O2. In most
cases a high atom efficiency for iodine was observed since
only 0.5 equivalents of elemental iodine was needed for
efficient transformation. Therefore, comparing the I2/
H2O2/H+ system in water with other previously reported
methods, which either employ large amounts of strong ac-
ids or heavy metal salts for enhancing the reactivity of io-
dine, we believe that the presented method makes a
substantial contribution from the green chemistry point of
view.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 3.80 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 3 H,
OCH3), 4.51 (s, 2 H, CH2I), 6.94 (d, J = 9.0, 1 H, Ar), 7.08 (dd,
J = 9.0 Hz, 3.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.37 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar).
13C (76 MHz, CDCl3): d = 9.5, 55.8, 56.1, 113.0, 114.6, 121.7,
124.2, 153.2, 153.5, 193.4.
MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 306 (M+, 55), 165 (100), 151 (7), 121
(18), 107 (10), 92 (12), 77 (20).
Anal. Calcd for C10H11IO3: C, 39.24; H, 3.62. Found: C, 39.18; H,
3.62.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to A. Podgoršek and A. Gačeša for assi-
stance in recording NMR spectra, to T. Stipanovič and Prof. B. Sta-
novnik for elemental combustion analysis, to B. Kralj and D. Žigon
for MS, and to the Slovenian Research Agency for financial sup-
port.
References
(1) (a) Merkushev, E. B. Synthesis 1988, 923. (b) Sasson, Y. In
The Chemistry of Functional Groups,: The Chemistry of
Halides, Pseudo Halides and Azides, Supplement D2, Part 2;
Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, 1995, 535–
620.
(2) Diederich, F.; Stang, P. J. Metal-Catalysed Cross-Coupling
Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998.
(3) (a) Seevers, R. H.; Counsell, R. E. Chem. Rev. 1982, 82,
575. (b) Sovak, M. Radiocontrast Agents, In Handbook of
Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 73; Springer: Berlin,
1993.
(4) (a) Kraszkiewicz, L.; Sosnowski, M.; Skulski, L.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9113. (b) Suzuki, H.; Nakamura, K.;
Goto, R. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1966, 39, 128. (c) Patil, B.
R.; Bhusare, S. R.; Pawar, R. P.; Vibhute, Y. B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 7179. (d) Olah, G. A.; Qi, W.; Sandford, G.;
Prakash, G. K. S. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3194.
(5) (a) Bachki, A.; Foubelo, F.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron 1994, 50,
5139. (b) Orito, K.; Hatakeyama, T.; Takeo, M.; Suginome,
H. Synthesis 1995, 1273. (c) Sy, W.-W.; Lodge, B. A.; By,
A. W. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 877. (d) Sy, W.-W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6223. (e) Krassowska-
Swiebocka, B.; Luliꢀski, P.; Skulski, L. Synthesis 1995, 926.
(6) (a) Zupan, M.; Iskra, J.; Stavber, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 6305. (b) Jereb, M.; Stavber, S.; Zupan, M. Synthesis
2003, 853.
Iodine was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received. A
30% aq solution of H2O2 was purchased from Merck; the precise
content of active H2O2 was determined by the iodometric method;
H2O2 was reacted with an acidic solution of a known, precisely
weighed amount of KI, the amount of iodine released was calculat-
ed by titration with Na2S2O3. Substrates were purchased from Sig-
ma Aldrich and used as received, other chemicals (Na2SO4,
Na2S2O3, CH2Cl2) were purchased from Merck. Mps were deter-
mined on a Büchi apparatus. 1H NMR spectra of crude reaction mix-
tures were recorded on a Varian EM 360L spectrometer at 60 MHz
and spectra of purified products on a Varian INOVA 300 spectrom-
eter at 300 MHz and 13C NMR spectra on the same instrument at 76
MHz. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm from TMS as the internal
standard. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin–Elmer 1310 spec-
trometer. Standard KBr pellet procedures were used to obtain IR
spectra of solids, while a film of neat material was used to obtain IR
spectra of liquid products. MS were obtained on an Autospec Q in-
strument under EI conditions at 70 eV. Elemental analyses were
carried out on a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN analyzer.
General Procedure
Substrate (1 mmol) was added to H2O (10 mL), followed by the ad-
dition of finely powdered I2 (127 mg, 0.5 mmol; 254 mg, 1.0 mmol;
381 mg, 1.5 mmol; see Tables 1 and 2). After the mixture was
stirred at 50 °C for a few minutes a 30% aq solution of H2O2 (con-
taining 0.6 mmol, 20.4 mg or 1 mmol, 34.0 mg of active oxidant, see
Tables 1 and 2) and a drop of 40% H2SO4 were added. The reaction
mixture was vigorously stirred at 50 °C for various times (2–27 h,
see Tables 1 and 2). When the reaction was complete the product
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL), the organic phase was washed
an aq solution of Na2S2O3 (10%, 20 mL), H2O (20 mL), dried over
anhyd Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude reaction mix-
(7) Hubig, S. M.; Jung, W.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
6233.
(8) Carreño, M. C.; Ruano, J. L. G.; Sanz, G.; Toledo, M. A.;
Urbano, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4081.
(9) Edgar, K. J.; Falling, S. N. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5287.
(10) Kryska, A.; Skulski, L. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1999, 590.
Synthesis 2006, No. 15, 2603–2607 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York