Scheme 6
Scheme 4
to the hydroxymethyl group and thus, no transesterification could
occur. The difference of regioselectivity in the oxidative cyclome-
talation of propiolates to nickel and cobalt complexes should
account for these results. A tail–tail (pentyl group R4) oxidative
cyclometalation of pentyl propiolate 4a with the nickel complexes
to give intermediate 12 is known.1,2,5,6 We have observed the
same type of regioselective products in our pervious nickel-
catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition of propiolates and allenes.5
In conclusion, we have developed a cobalt-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2]
cyclotrimerization of alkynyl alcohols with propiolates. The
reaction is highly regio- and chemoselective affording benzolactone
derivatives in good to excellent yields. Further extension of this
cycloaddition product was observed and the structure was
confirmed by NOE studies. In all of these reactions, the homo
cyclotrimerization products of propiolates were observed in 5–20%
yields.
In addition to propargyl alcohols, the reaction was further
extended into propargyl amines (Scheme 4). The reaction of
propiolate 4c with N-propargyl p-toluenesulfoneamide 6a in the
presence of CoI2(dppe)/Zn afforded benzolactam derivative 7a in
75% yield. Under similar reaction conditions, propargyl amine 6b
also underwent [2 + 2 + 2] cocyclotrimerization with 4c, but the
expected product appears to react further with a propiolate
molecule to give 7b in 72% yield.
work into partially intermolecular version and
mechanistic study is underway.
a detailed
The regioselectivity of propargyl alcohol 1a in the present
cobalt-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition was demonstrated with
unsymmetrical diyne 8 under the standard reaction conditions
affording phthalide derivative 9 in 79% yield as the exclusive
product. The other possible product 10 was not detected in the 1H
NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture indicating excellent
regioselectivity of 1a in the reaction (Scheme 5).
We thank the National Science Council of Republic of China
(NSC-93-2113-M-007-033) for support this research.
Notes and references
1 (a) K. P. C. Vollhardt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1984, 23, 539; (b)
N. E. Schore, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 1081; S. Saito and Y. Yamamoto,
Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 2901; (c) S. Ikeda, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 511;
(d) J. A. Varela and C. Saa, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3787.
2 (a) S. Kotha and E. Brahmachary, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 3561; (b)
A. Jeevanandam, R. P. Korivi, I.-W. Huang and C.-H. Cheng, Org.
Lett., 2002, 5, 807; (c) M. Shanmugasundaram, M.-S. Wu,
M. Jeganmohan, C.-W. Huang and C.-H. Cheng, J. Org. Chem., 2002,
67, 7724; (d) M.-S. Wu, M. Shanmugasundaram and C.-H. Cheng,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 718.
3 (a) J. C. Sauer and T. L. Cairns, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 2659; (b)
L. S. Meriwether, E. C. Colthup, G. W. Kennerly and R. N. Reusch,
J. Org. Chem., 1961, 26, 5155; (c) A. F. Donda and G. Moretti, J. Org.
Chem., 1966, 31, 985; (d) Y. Wakatsuki, T. Kuramitsu and H. Yamazaki,
Tetrahedron. Lett., 1974, 4549.
The origin of formation of benzolactones 3, 5 and lactams 7
from the present cobalt-catalyzed cycloaddition of alkynyl
alcohols or amines 1 or 6 with propiolates 2 or 4 is likely from
the regioselective head to head (R4) oxidative cyclometalation of
propiolates to give cobaltacyclopentadiene intermediate 11.1
Insertion of a molecule of alkynyl alcohol (or amine) into a
Co–carbon bond of 11 in which the two ester groups are next to
the metal center, followed by reductive elimination and trans-
esterification afforded the final product 3, 5 or 7.
It is known that nickel complexes also catalyze the [2 + 2 + 2]
cycloaddition of alkynes. To compare the regioselectivity in the
nickel- and cobalt-catalyzed reaction, the cycloaddition of 1a with
4a catalyzed by the NiBr2(dppe)/Zn system was studied. As shown
in Scheme 6, an entirely different product 13 in 62% yield was
observed. In this product, the two ester groups are meta and para
4 (a) S. Ikeda, H. Watanabe and Y. Sato, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7026; (b)
Y. Yamamoto, H. Kitahara, R. Ogawa and K. Itoh, J. Org. Chem., 1998,
63, 9610; (c) B. Witulski and C. Alayrac, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002,
41, 3281; (d) R. Takeuchi and Y. Nakaya, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 3659; (e)
D. Pena, D. Perez, E. Guitian and L. Castedo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999,
121, 5827.
5 M. Shanmugasundaram, M.-S. Wu and C.-H. Cheng, Org. Lett., 2001, 3,
4233.
6 (a) D.-J. Huang, T. Sambaiah and C.-H. Cheng, New J. Chem., 1998, 22,
1147; (b) T. Sambaiah, L.-P. Li, D.-J. Huang, C.-H. Lin,
D. K. Rayabarapu and C.-H. Cheng, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 3663;
(c) M.-S. Wu, D. K. Rayabarapu and C.-H. Cheng, Tetrahedron., 2004,
60, 10005; (d) T. T. Jayanth, M. Jeganmohan and C.-H. Cheng, J. Org.
Chem., 2004, 69, 8445; (e) J.-C. Hsieh, D. K. Rayabarapu and
C.-H. Cheng, Chem. Commun., 2004, 532.
7 (a) T. Aoki, T. Furusho, T. Kimura, S. Satake and S. Funayama, Jpn.
Pat., 7324724, 1973 (Chem. Abstr., 1974, 80, 129246); (b) M. Lacova,
Chem. Zvesti., 1973, 27, 525, Chem. Abstr., 1974, 80, 59757; (c)
R. C. Elderfield, Hetrocyclic Compounds., Wiley, New York, 1951,
vol. 2, ch. 2.
Scheme 5
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 4955–4957 | 4957