4388
Balfour, Qian, and Zhou: Electronic spectroscopy of CrN
observed CrN A state energy pattern mirrors that of the de-
perturbed VO B state. The uneven pattern can be associated
with off-diagonal matrix elements with the higher ⌸ state,
9 B. Simard, C. Masoni, and P. A. Hackett, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 136, 44
͑1989͒.
10 S. L. Peter and T. M. Dunn, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5333 ͑1989͒.
11 W. J. Balfour, A. J. Merer, H. Niki, B. Simard, and P. A. Hackett, J.
Chem. Phys. 99, 3288 ͑1993͒.
2
as in the case of VO B state. The deviation from a case ͑a͒
Hamiltonian may be due to weak perturbations from the 2⌺ϩ
12 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 165, 97 ͑1994͒.
13 J. K. Bates and T. M. Dunn, Can. J. Phys. 54, 1216 ͑1976͒.
14 H. Li, C. M-T. Chan, and A. S-C. Cheung, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 176, 219
͑1996͒.
2
state. Another possible perturber is the ⌬ state from the 1␦3
configuration not included in Fig. 3. A sensible deperturba-
tion analysis must await the availability of a high resolution
spectrum.
15 T. M. Dunn and M. K. Rao, Nature ͑London͒ 222, 266 ͑1969͒.
16
´
´
´
J. L. Femenias, C. Athenour, and T. M. Dunn, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 2861
͑1975͒.
The magnitude of the observed ⌳-doubling parameters is
somewhat smaller than that in MoN. This is consistent with
the smaller spin-orbit interaction in CrN. A direct compari-
son with VO is not meaningful since we did not use the full
matrix employed in the VO analysis in our least squares fit.
In the present study we have concentrated on the de-
17 E. A. Pazyuk, E. N. Moskvitina, and Y. Y. Kuzyakov, Spectrosc. Lett. 19,
627 ͑1986͒.
18
´
´
´
J. L. Femenias, C. Athenour, K. M. Rao, and T. M. Dunn, J. Mol. Spec-
trosc. 130, 269 ͑1988͒.
19 Y. Azuma, J. A. Barry, M. P. J. Lyne, A. J. Merer, J. O. Schroder, and J.
´
´
L. Femenias, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 1 ͑1989͒.
20 Y. Azuma, G. Huang, M. P. J. Lyne, A. J. Merer, and V. I. Srdanov, J.
Chem. Phys. 100, 4138 ͑1994͒.
4
4
tailed analysis of the A ⌸r←X ⌺Ϫ transition. Evidence
for two other electronic transitions has been noted. Although
rotational analyses have not yet been carried out for these
systems, the nature of the transitions involved can be in-
ferred. It is reasonable to assume that all observed bands
21 R. C. Carlson, J. K. Bates, and T. M. Dunn, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 110, 215
͑1985͒.
22 E. A. Pazyuk, E. N. Moskvitina, and Y. Y. Kuzyakov, Spectrosc. Lett. 21,
447 ͑1988͒.
23 D. A. Fletcher, K. J. Jung, and T. C. Steimle, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 901
͑1993͒.
4
with the jet-cooled source have X ⌺Ϫ as the lower state.
1
Two low-lying doublet states arise from the 1␦29 configu-
24 K. J. Jung, D. A. Fletcher, and T. C. Steimle, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 165, 448
͑1994͒.
ration ͑see Fig. 3͒ but they are expected to be several thou-
sands of cmϪ1 above the ground state and should be depopu-
lated in the supersonic cooling. The ͑0Ϫ1͒ bands, with lower
state about 1000 cmϪ1 above the ground state, have very
weak signals in our experiments. Case ͑a͒ allowed upper
25 N. S-K. Sze and A. S-C. Cheung, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 173, 194 ͑1995͒.
26 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 11B, 225 ͑1994͒.
27 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, W. J. Balfour, J. Cao, C. X. W. Qian, and S.
J. Rixon, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 168, 350 ͑1994͒.
28 A. J. Marr, M. E. Flores, and T. C. Steimle, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 8183
͑1996͒.
4
4
states are then the B ⌺Ϫ and A ⌸r , as indicated in Fig. 3.
Several other excited doublet states can mix with these two
bright states through spin-orbit coupling and transitions to
them can become weakly allowed. The most plausible as-
signment for the observed systems is that the two transitions
29 E. J. Friedman-Hill and R. W. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6141 ͑1994͒.
30 K. Y. Jung, T. C. Steimle, D. Dai, and K. Balasubramanian, J. Chem.
Phys. 102, 643 ͑1995͒.
31 K. L. Kunze and J. F. Harrison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 3812 ͑1990͒.
32 C. W. Bauschlicher, Chem. Phys. Lett. 100, 515 ͑1983͒.
33 S. M. Mattar, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 3171 ͑1993͒.
4
2
involve B ⌺Ϫ, and ⌸͑1␦24͒ upper states. This conjecture
34 S. M. Mattar and B. J. Doleman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 216, 369 ͑1993͒.
35 J. F. Harrison, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3513 ͑1996͒.
36 M. R. A. Bloomberg and P. E. M. Siegbahn, Theor. Chim. Acta 81, 365
͑1992͒.
is currently being explored.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
37 I. Shim and K. A. Gingerich, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 46, 145 ͑1993͒.
38 P. W. Langhoff and C. W. Bauschlicher, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 143, 169
͑1990͒.
We thank Professors M. D. Morse, A. J. Merer, and A.
4
4
S.-C. Cheung for helpful comments regarding the ⌸← ⌺Ϫ
transitions, Professor D. Berg for useful information about
the triple bond in metal nitrides, and J. Cao for technical
assistance. Financial support from the University of Victoria
and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
of Canada to W.J.B. and C.Q. is acknowledged.
39 J. N. Allison and W. A. Goddard, Chem. Phys. 81, 263 ͑1983͒.
40 D. Dai and K. Balasubramanian, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 172, 421 ͑1995͒.
41 A. J. Merer, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 407 ͑1988͒.
42 M. C. McCarthy and R. W. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6347 ͑1994͒.
43 W. J. Balfour, J. Cao, C. V. V. Prasad, and C. X. W. Qian, J. Chem. Phys.
101, 10 343 ͑1994͒.
44 D. Proch and T. Trickl, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 713 ͑1989͒.
45 C. E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels ͑Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser., Natl. Bur.
Stand. Circular No. 35, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,
D.C. 1971͒, Vol. II.
1 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6344 ͑1992͒.
2 T. M. Dunn, L. K. Hanson, and K. A. Rubinson, Can. J. Phys. 48, 1657
͑1970͒.
46 G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure: Vol. I-Spectra
of Diatomic Molecules ͑Krieger, Malabar, Reprint Edition, 1989͒.
47 T. E. Nevin, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 237, 471 ͑1938͒.
48 A. S-C. Cheung, A. W. Taylor, and A. J. Merer, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 92, 391
͑1982͒.
3 J. K. Bates, N. L. Raniri, and T. M. Dunn, Can. J. Phys. 54, 915 ͑1976͒.
4 A. E. Douglas and P. M. Veillette, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 5378 ͑1980͒.
5
´
´ ´
C. Athenour, J. L. Femenias, and T. M. Dunn, Can. J. Phys. 60, 109
͑1982͒.
49 W. J. Balfour, C. X. W. Qian, and C. Zhou ͑unpublished͒.
50 H. Lefebvre-Brion and R. W. Field, Perturbations in the Spectra of Di-
atomic Molecules ͑Academic, Orlando, 1986͒.
6 K. Brabaharan, J. A. Coxon, and A. B. Yamashita, Can. J. Phys. 63, 997
͑1985͒.
7 B. Simard, H. Niki, and P. A. Hackett, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 7012 ͑1990͒.
8 D. A. Fletcher, K. J. Jung, and T. C. Steimle, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4288
͑1993͒.
51 A. S-C. Cheung, P. G. Hajigeorgiou, G. Huang, S.-Z. Huang, and A. J.
Merer, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 163, 443 ͑1994͒.
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 106, No. 11, 15 March 1997
129.49.170.188 On: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:16:05