Macromolecules
Article
2
5
functionalize polyolefin is rarely reported. In this contribu-
tion, a series of iPPs containing pendent anthryl groups were
efficiently synthesized by copolymerization of propylene and 9-
hexenylathracene (HA) for the first time. As expected, maleic
anhydride functionalized iPP (MAPP) and some other
functionalized iPPs were synthesized by D−A reaction between
the pendent anthryl groups of poly(propylene-co-HA) and
dienophiles without any side reaction. Unique fluorescent
properties brought by the pendent anthryl groups of iPP chains
were studied.
mL of anhydrous toluene was slowly added to the Grignard reagent
solution. The mixture was kept at room temperature for 8 h. After that
the mixture was acidified with hydrochloric acid (10 vol %), the
organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with
diethyl ether (2 × 100 mL). The combined organic layer was washed
with water and dried by MgSO , and the solvent was evaporated under
4
vacuum to give the crude product. 46 g of P O and 200 mL of
4
10
toluene were added to the crude product, and the mixture was stirred
for 6 h at room temperature. Then the solid residue was filtered off,
and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The crude product was
purified by column chromatography using hexane to give 33.4 g of
pure HA as yellow oily solid (yield 54%). IR (KBr): ν = 3047, 2945,
−
1 1
1
620, 1444, 729 cm . H NMR (400 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl ): 8.32 (s,
3
2
. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
1
H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.00 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.52−7.42 (m,
2
.1. Materials and Instrumentation. All moisture and/or oxygen
4H), 5.85 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.07−4.94 (m, 2H), 3.64−
3.58 (m, 2H), 2.18 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.84 (ddd, J = 11.7, 9.4, 6.3 Hz,
sensitive manipulations were operated using standard Schlenk
techniques or in an MBraun glovebox under a dry nitrogen
atmosphere. Anhydrous solvents used in this work were purified by
a solvent purification system purchased from Mbraun. rac-Et-
13
2H), 1.73−1.64 (m, 2H). C NMR (101 MHz, δ, ppm, C Cl D ):
2 4 2
139.09 (s, 1C), 135.48 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1C), 131.69 (s, 2C), 129.61 (s,
2C), 129.37 (s, 2C), 125.71 (s, 3C), 125.17 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2C), 124.65
(s, 2 C), 114.93 (s, 1 C).
[
Ind] ZrCl2 and dimethyl(pyridylamido)hafnium precatalyst were
2
26,27
sysnthesized using the modified procedures.
Commercial
2.3. Typical Copolymerization Procedure. Copolymerizations
of propylene and HA were performed under atmospheric pressure in a
150 mL glass reactor equipped with a mechanical stirring bar. The
reactor was charged with prescribed volume of toluene and
propylene was used directly for polymerization without further
purification. Modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO, 10 wt % in
toluene), Al Bu , [Ph C][B(C F ) ], 6-bromo-1-hexene, P O ,
anthrone, methyl propiolate, vinylene carbonate, N-cyclohexyl-
maleimide, phenyl vinyl sulfone, fumaronitrile, 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazo-
line-3,5-dione, and fullerene were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and
used as received. 9-Vinylanthracene, 9-allylanthracene, and 9-
i
3
3
6
5
4
4
10
comonomer under a nitrogen atmosphere, and then the propylene
i
gas feed was started, followed by the addition of Al Bu
or MMAO.
3
After equilibration at the desired polymerization temperature for 5
min, the polymerization reaction was initiated by adding the prescribed
amount of catalyst and cocatalyst. After a desired period, the reactor
was vented. The resulting copolymers were precipitated from
hydrochloric acid/ethanol (2 vol %), filtered, washed three times
with ethanol, then marinated in acetone for 12 h to remove the
unreacted comonomer, and then dried under vacuum at 40 °C to
constant weight.
2.4. Diels−Alder Functionalization of Poly(propylene-co-
HA). In a typical reaction, 0.2 g of poly(propylene-co-HA) copolymer
was dissolved in 20 mL of toluene at 100 °C under nitrogen in a 100
mL flask with a magnetic stirrer. After cooling the system to 80 °C, an
appropriate amount of functional dienophile was added to the reactor,
and the reaction was stirred for another 6 h at the temperature before
precipitating the reaction mixture in 200 mL of acetone. The resulting
grafting copolymer was isolated by filtration, purified by two
dissolving−precipitating cycles, and dried under vacuum at 40 °C
for 24 h.
2
8
butenylanthracene were synthesized according to the literature.
Maleic anhydride was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and purified by
sublimation before use. All high-temperature NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker AM-400 instrument in 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane-
d2 at 120 °C. The melting and crystallization temperatures of the
polymers were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC,
TA Instruments, Model Q2000) with a heating and cooling rate of 10
°
C/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out under a
nitrogen atmosphere using thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instru-
ments, Model Q50) with a heat rate of 20 °C/min. The molecular
weights and molecular weight distributions of the polymer samples
were determined at 150 °C by a PL-GPC 220 type high-temperature
gel permeation chromatograph (GPC). 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
TCB) was employed as elute solvent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min,
and the calibration was made by polystyrene standard Easi-Cal PS-1
PL Ltd.). The FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Bio-Rad FTS-135
(
(
spectrophotometer using polymer thin films. Polarizing optical
microscopy (POM) observation was done on an Olympus BX51
polarizing optical microscopy equipped with a LTS 350 hot stage and
a TMS 94 temperature programmer (Linkam). The water contact
angel experiment was conducted on a Kruess G10/DSA10 contact
angle analyzer. UV−vis spectroscopy was conducted with a
SHIMADZU UV-1600PC. A slit of 2 nm was applied, and the
absorption was recorded by 0.1 nm at a scan rate of 200 nm/min.
Excitation spectra and emission spectra were obtained on a
PerkinElmer LS 50B luminescence spectrometer with xenon discharge
lamp excitation. Cyclic voltammetry was performed on a CHI600E
electrochemical workstation in a standard three-electrode cell under a
blanket of argon in a 0.1 M solution of 0.1 M n-Bu NPF at room
3
. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
.1. Synthesis of Poly(propylene-co-HA). Since the
3
dimethyl(pyridylamido)hafnium complex (Cat. Hf) and the
classical metallocene catalyst rac-Et[Ind] ZrCl2 (Cat. Zr)
displayed excellent performance in the copolymerization of
propylene with 4-phenyl-1-butene and p-(3-butenyl)styrene,
2
18
these two catalysts were both adopted for the copolymeriza-
tions. To achieve an effective incorporation of anthracene-
containing comonomer and avoid depression of catalytic
activity caused by the bulky and conjugated functional group,
selecting a promising comonomer is also a matter of great
concern. To find out an optimal comonomer candidate, as
shown in Scheme 1, a series of 9-substituted anthracene
comonomers with different olefin substitutions, including 9-
vinylanthracene (VA), 9-allylanthracene (AA), 9-butenyl-
anthracene (BA), and 9-hexenylanthracene (HA), were
synthesized according to the similar synthetic route reported
4
6
temperature. Measurement was carried out with platinum working and
platinum counter electrodes and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode; the
reduction potential was recorded at a scan rate of 100 mV/s and
reported with reference to the ferrocene/ferrocenium redox couple.
2
.2. Synthesis of 9-Hexenylanthracene (HA). Freshly cut
magnesium pieces (7.36 g) were suspended in 200 mL of dry
tetrahydrofuran. A few drops of 6-bromo-1-hexene and a pellet of
iodine were added into the flask and stirred for 10 min to initiate the
reaction. After the color of iodine faded, a total amount of 49 g of 6-
bromo-1-hexene was added dropwise into the flask at 0 °C. The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. Then the system was
heated to reflux for another 4 h. Subsequently, the system was cooled
to 0 °C again, and a solution of anthrone (38.9 g, 200 mmol) in 100
28
in the literature and being screened in the copolymerizations.
Homopolymerizations of all these synthesized anthracene-
containing monomers were tried first but no polymer or
oligomer can be obtained. As observed, both Cat. Hf and Cat.
Zr failed to efficiently incorporate the anthryl comonomers
B
Macromolecules XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX