those which lead to DHP’s with 3,4-cis relative stereochem-
istry and those which culminate in a 3,4-trans arrangement
of hydroxy groups. Our mandate was to devise a reaction
sequence which would permit the stereospecific synthesis
of each isomer.
By selection of the appropriate pentose sugar (Table 1), it
ought to be possible to prepare any isomer of DHP.
Table 1. Dihydroxyprolines from Pentoses
We have recently reported a synthesis of an L-2,3-trans-
3,4-cis-DHP (5) from D-gulonolactone (4; Scheme 1)7 by
DHP isomer
pentose precursor
L-2,3-cis-3,4-cis
L-ribose
L-2,3-cis-3,4-trans
L-2,3-trans-3,4-cis
L-2,3-trans-3,4-trans
D-2,3-cis-3,4-cis
L-arabinose
L-lyxose
L-xylose
Scheme 1
D-ribose
D-2,3-cis-3,4-trans
D-2,3-trans-3,4-cis
D-2,3-trans-3,4-trans
D-arabinose
D-lyxose
D-xylose
We chose D-2,3-cis-3,4-cis-DHP as our test case, because
D-ribonolactone is commercially available. The synthesis of
protected amino acid 13 is outlined in Scheme 3.10 The
primary alcohol of compound 6 was protected as its
triphenylmethyl (trityl) ether.11 Formation of tert-butyldi-
methylsilyl ethers from the two secondary alcohols, at C2
and C3, was accomplished under standard conditions12 to
give 7.
adapting the methodology of Fleet et al.8 This first-generation
approach has two drawbacks: it involves the excision of one
carbon atom with concomitant destruction of a stereogenic
center, and the use of an acetonide (or indeed, any cyclic
protecting group) limits the strategy to DHP’s with a 3,4-
cis relative stereochemistry.
To overcome these limitations, we decided to use the
pentose family of sugars as our source of chirality. Protection
of the 1,2-diol required the use of “independent” protecting
groups for each secondary alcohol. Our retrosynthetic
analysis, as outlined in Scheme 2, does not specify stereo-
Fleet and Son have previously reported that reductive
opening of silyl-protected hydroxylactones with LiAlH4 can
be accompanied by silyl migration.12b On the basis of their
experience, we employed LiBH4, which effected reduction
slowly but cleanly to give compound 8 as the sole product.
Diol 8 was converted to bis(mesylate) 9 by adding a
solution of the diol in pyridine, dropwise, to a premixed
solution of methanesulfonyl chloride and catalytic DMAP
in pyridine. Heating bis(mesylate) 9 in neat benzylamine (1.5
mL of benzylamine/g of substrate), at 80 °C for 60 h, led to
formation of pyrrolidine 10.
Scheme 2
Replacement of the N-benzyl substituent by the Fmoc
group (Fmoc ) (fluorenylmethoxy)carbonyl) was performed
for two reasons: to increase stabilility toward oxidation (vide
supra) and to provide a suitable protecting group for
downstream applications in peptide chemistry. Hydrogenoly-
sis of 10 gave the corresponding secondary amine.
Significantly, the trityl group was stable to these reaction
conditions.13 The crude amine was treated directly with
fluorenylmethyl chloroformate in toluene to give 11 in an
efficient manner.
chemistry intentionally. We believe that the disconnections
apply regardless. P1, P2, and P3 are protecting groups.
Pyrrolidine I can be envisaged to arise from the suitably
functionalized precursor II, using the double-displacement
chemistry of Fleet. Compound II can be derived from
appropriately protected γ-lactone III via a reductive ring
opening. Lactones of general structure III (P2 ) P3 ) H)
can be obtained by bromine oxidation of aldopentoses,9
represented by the generic structure IV.
Bessodes et al. had previously reported the selective
cleavage of a trityl ether in the presence of tert-butyldi-
(10) All new compounds in Scheme 3 gave satisfactory 1H and 13C NMR
and HRMS data.
(11) Ireland, R. E.; Anderson, R. C.; Badoud, R.; Fitzsimmons, B. J.;
McGarvey, G. J.; Thaisrivongs, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
105, 1988-2006.
(12) (a) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. ProtectiVe Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1991; Chapter 2, p 77.
(b) Fleet, G. W. J.; Son, J. C. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 2637-2647.
(13) Hydrogenolysis of trityl ethers has been reported: Mirrington, R.
N.; Schmalzl, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2877-2881. However, others
have described the selective cleavage of a benzylamine in the presence of
a trityl ether: Thompson, D. K.; Hubert, C. N.; Wightman, R. H.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 3827-3840.
(7) Weir, C. A.; Taylor, C. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1554-1558.
(8) Fleet, G. W. J.; Son, J. C.; Green, D. St. C.; di Bello, I. C.; Winchester,
B. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 2649-2655.
(9) See: (a) Bouchez, V.; Stasik, I.; Beaupe`re, D.; Uzan, R. Carbohydr.
Res. 1997, 300, 139-143. (b) Han, S. Y.; Joullie´, M. M.; Fokin, V. V.;
Petasis, N. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 2535-2562 and references
therein.
788
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 5, 1999