G. Mehta et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 5116–5119
5119
(M+Na)+: 241.1204; found: 241.1202; compound 14: mp 122–123 °C IR (thin
film)
max = 3436, 2968, 2926, 1675, 1502, 1466, 1210, 1044, 885 cmÀ1 1H
Acknowledgements
m
;
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d = 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 5.89 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.88
(d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 5.79 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d, J = 3 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (br s, 1H),
3.72 (s, 3H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.98 (d, J = 18 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 2.12 (s,
3H), 1.97 (dd, J = 18, 7 Hz, 1H), 1.83 (s, 3H), 1.52 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.36 (s, 3H),
1.34 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d = 200.62, 198.60, 151.19,
149.90, 147.55, 138.33, 136.14, 133.69, 128.91, 126.64, 126.00, 121.56, 113.79
(2C), 70.85, 57.59, 55.46, 55.32, 48.97, 40.48, 29.86, 29.62, 25.36, 23.40, 16.08,
15.63 ppm; HRMS (ES) m/z calcd for C26H32O5Na (M+Na)+: 447.2147; found:
T.B.K. and Y.C.S.K. thank UGC for support through a Dr. D. S. Kot-
hari post-doctoral fellowship. X-ray data were collected at the CCD
facility at IISc, supported by DST, India, and we thank Mr. Saikat
Sen for solving the structure. G.M. is grateful to CSIR for the award
of a Bhatnagar Fellowship.
447.2145; compound 15 mp 142–143 °C IR (thin film)
mmax = 3448, 2966, 2926,
1685, 1507, 1466, 1208, 1045, 865 cmÀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d = 6.62 (s,
;
References and notes
1H), 6.52 (s, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (s, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 5.30
(d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (s, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.35 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1H),
2.33 (br s, 2H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 1.95 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H), 1.75 (s, 3H), 1.01 (s, 3H),
0.94 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d = 201.23, 198.96, 151.53,
150.97, 146.27, 139.10, 135.72, 131.17, 127.27, 126.91, 126.10, 123.55, 114.06,
113.27, 70.28, 60.37, 56.69, 56.26, 56.24, 48.41, 29.65, 28.96, 28.83, 23.06,
16.05, 15.87 ppm; HRMS (ES) m/z calcd for C26H32O5Na (M+Na)+: 447.2147;
1. For a recent review, see: Guo, B.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Appl. Biochem.
Microbiol. 2008, 44, 136–142.
2. For example, see: (a) Gehrt, A.; Erkel, G.; Anke, T.; Sterner, O. Nat. Prod. Res.
2000, 14, 281–284; (b) Gatenbay, W. A.; Munday-Finch, S. C.; Wilkins, A. L.;
Miles, C. O. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1092–1097; (c) Mussaif, M.; Jacques,
P.; Schaarwachter, P.; Budzikiewicz, H.; Thonart, P. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
1997, 63, 1739–1743.
3. (a) Assante, G.; Dallavalle, S.; Malpezzi, L.; Nasini, G.; Burruano, S.; Torta, L.
Tetrahedron 2005, 6, 7686–7692; (b) Arnone, A.; Nasini, G.; Panzeri, W.; Vajna
de Pava, O.; Malpezzi, L. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 146–149; (c) Arnone, A.; Assante,
G.; Bava, A.; Dallavalle, S.; Nasini, G. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 786–791.
4. Yamamurs, S.; Simpol, L. R.; Ozawa, K.; Ohtani, K.; Otsuka, H.; Kasai, R.;
Yamasaki, K.; Padolina, W. G. Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 105–110.
5. For selected recent examples of biomimetic/bioinspired Diels–Alder reactions
in natural product synthesis, see: (a) Heckrodt, T. J.; Mulzer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 4680–4681; (b) Vanderwal, C. D.; Vosburg, D. A.; Weiler, S.;
Sorensen, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5393–5407; (c) Mehta, G.; Pan, S. C.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3985–3988; (d) Mehta, G.; Ramesh, S. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 1985–1987; (e) Dong, S.; Zhu, J.; Porco, J. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 2738–2739; (f) Mehta, G.; Roy, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1458–1460;
(g) Arkoudis, E.; Stratakis, M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4484–4490.
found: 447.2131; ( )-acremine G (1) mp 132–133 °C IR (thin film)
mmax = 3370,
2925, 1674, 1420, 1264, 1018, 738 cmÀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d = 6.51 (s,
;
2H), 6.36 (q, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.76 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 5.63 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 5.62
(d, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 5.03 (br s, 1H, OH), 3.75 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 19 Hz 1H),
2.47 (d, J = 19 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.64 (br s, 1H, OH),
1.21 (s, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d = 196.05, 194.09, 150.00,
148.22, 144.35, 142.82, 135.15, 131.29, 124.85, 123.64, 122.51, 121.90, 118.67,
113.57, 80.59, 70.85, 54.85, 38.45, 36.15, 29.60 (2C), 22.6, 16.88, 15.72 ppm;
HRMS (ES) m/z calcd for C24H26O5Na (M+Na)+: 417.1678; found: 417.1621.
11. (a) Veselovsky, V. V.; Gybin, A. S.; Lozanova, A. V.; Moiseenkov, A. M.; Smit, W.
A.; Caple, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 175–178; (b) Coperet, C.; Chabanas, M.;
Saint-Arroman, R. P.; Basst, J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 156–181.
12. Single crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Bruker AXS SMART
APEX CCD diffractometer at 291 K using graphite monochromated MoK
a
radiation (k = 0.7107 Å). The X-ray generator was operated at 50 KV and 35 mA.
6. A manuscript describing the first total syntheses of acremines A, B and I is
under the consideration of the Editor for publication in Tetrahedron Letters.
7. While the present research towards acremine G was underway, a biomimetic
Diels–Alder-based total synthesis of acremine G appeared in the literature.
Although there is convergence in the last step of the synthesis,8 our approach
to acremine G is noteworthy for its brevity and simplicity and the remarkable
acceleration of the key Diels–Alder cycloaddition.
The data were collected with an
set were collected using SMART in three different settings of
x
scan width of 0.3°. A total of 606 frames per
(0°, 90°, 180°
u
and 270°) keeping the sample at a detector distance of 6.062 cm and the 2h
value fixed at À28°. The data were reduced by SAINTPLUS; an empirical
absorption correction was applied using the package SADABS and XPREP was
used to determine the space group. The crystal structures were solved by direct
methods using SIR92 and refined by full-matrix least-squares method on F2
using SHELXL97. CCDC 783610 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this Letter. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
8. Arkoudis, E.; Lykakis, I. N.; Gryparis, C.; Stratakis, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2988–
2991.
9. It was found that methylhydroquinone was not amenable to direct Vilsmeier–
Haack formylation and therefore required phenolic group protection.
10. All new compounds reported here are racemic and characterized on the basis
of spectroscopic data (IR, 1H, 13C NMR and mass). Spectral data for some of the
ꢀ
Crystal data for 14:
b = 18.195(7), c = 20.491(7) Å,
V = 4894(3) Å3, Z = 8, calcd = 1.152 g/cm3, 39564 reflections measured, 19755
C
26H32O5, M = 424.52, triclinic, P1, a = 15.600(6),
a
= 115.182(7), b = 104.376(7), c = 98.049(7)°,
q
key compounds are as follows: compound 4b: IR (neat)
m
max = 1506, 1463, 1401,
unique (Rint = 0.071), R1 = 0.0858 and wR2 = 0.1725 for 7188 observed
reflections.
1210, 1045, 971, 872 cmÀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d = 6.97 (s, 1H), 6.88 (d,
;
J = 16 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 5.04 (s, 1H), 3.83
(s, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 1.99 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
d = 151.88, 150.8, 142.74, 130.97, 127.12, 124.09, 123.36, 116.41, 114.52,
107.89, 56.33, 55.92, 18.70, 16.41 ppm; HRMS (ES) m/z calcd for C14H18O2Na
13. For a discussion on stereoelectronic control of Diels–Alder reactions, see: (a)
Mehta, G.; Uma, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 278–286; (b) Brocksom, T. J.;
Nakamura, J.; Ferreira, M. L.; Brocksom, U. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12, 597–622.
14. Refluxing toluene (110 °C) for 24 h.8