Q. Tian et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 6807–6809
6809
Na2CO3 at 60°C for 4–5 h to produce the lactam ester
3 in an overall yield of 40% from 5. In an alternative
procedure, 7 was converted to 3 in a yield of 80% by
employing the combination of NaBH4 and CoCl2.6
Marakovits, J. T.; Fuhrman, S. A.; Patick, A. K.;
Matthews, D. A.; Lee, C. A.; Ford, C. E.; Burke, B. J.;
Rejto, P. A.; Hendrickson, T. F.; Tuntland, T.; Brown, E.
L.; Meador, III, J. W.; Ferre, R. A.; Harr, J. E. V.; Kosa,
M. B.; Worland, S. L. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1213–1224.
2. Murray, P. J.; Starkey, I. D.; Davies, J. E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 6712–6714.
3. Hanessian, S.; Margarita, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
5887–5890.
4. Representative procedure: To a solution of N-Boc-L-(+)-
The next step was to reduce the ester group selectively
to the corresponding alcohol 9 in the presence of the
lactam. We examined both NaBH4 and LiBH4 for this
transformation and both reagents proved equally effec-
tive.7 In the case of NaBH4, the reaction afforded 9 in
an 89% yield versus an 81% yield for LiBH4. Since
NaBH4 is easier to handle during scale-up, we chose
NaBH4 over LiBH4 as the reducing agent.
glutamic acid dimethyl ester (5, 600 g, 2.18 mol, 1 equiv.)
in THF (6.0 L) was added dropwise a solution of LiH-
MDS in THF (4.7 L, 1 M, 4.7 mol, 2.16 equiv.) at −78°C
under an argon atmosphere. The resulting dark mixture
was stirred at −78°C for 1 h. At the same time, bromoace-
tonitrile (400 g) was stirred with basic aluminum oxide (70
g) for 2 h and then filtered. The freshly filtered bromoace-
tonitrile (280 g, 2.33 mol, 1.07 equiv.) was added dropwise
to the dianion solution over a period of 1 h while main-
taining the temperature below −70°C. The reaction mix-
ture was stirred at −78°C for additional 1–2 h and the
disappearance of the starting material (5) was confirmed
by TLC analysis. The reaction was quenched with pre-
cooled methanol (300 ml) in one portion and stirred for 30
min. The resulting methoxide was then quenched with a
pre-cooled acetic acid in THF solution (270 ml HOAc/2 L
THF) in one portion. After stirring for 30 min, the cooling
bath was removed and replaced with water bath. The
reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to 0 5°C and
then poured into a brine solution (250 g of NaCl in 4 L of
water) in a 50 L extractor. The layers were separated, and
the organic layer was concentrated to afford a dark brown
oil (ꢀ850 g). Silica gel (800 g), activated carbon (200 g)
and methylene chloride (2 L) were added to the Rotovap
flask and spun on a Rotovap for 1 h without heat and
vacuum. The slurry was then filtered and washed with
another 2 L of methylene chloride. The light brown filtrate
was concentrated to afford a light brown oil (7, 620 g, 90%
crude yield). The crude product 7 was used in the next step
Completion of the synthesis required lactam alcohol 9
to be oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde followed
by Wittig olefination. Initial studies indicated that the
a-amino aldehyde intermediate resulting from the oxi-
dation of 9 was highly water soluble and prone to
epimerization. With this in mind, and also to make the
process efficient and simple, we combined these two
reactions (oxidation/olefination) in a single reaction
vessel.8 Thus, 9 was oxidized with pyridine·SO3 in
DMSO and then treated with the Wittig reagent (gener-
ated from triethylphosphine and ethyl bromoacetate) to
afford crude 2 which was further purified through a
trituration procedure. According to chiral HPLC analy-
sis, compound 2 from this new route had a purity of
97% and a de of 98%. More importantly, this product is
exclusively the E isomer as indicated by HPLC and
proton NMR spectral analyses. The yield of 2 from 9
was 85%.
In summary, a new synthetic route to the key interme-
diate 2 via asymmetric dianionic cyanomethylation has
been developed and could be scaled up to the multi-
kilogram level. This route is highly efficient (4 steps and
30% overall yield), highly stereoselective (98% de and
100% E isomer), utilizes inexpensive starting materials
and requires no chromatographic purification.
1
without further purification. H NMR (CDCl3): l 1.46 (s,
9H), 2.12–2.24 (m, 2H), 2.77–2.82 (m, 2H), 2.85–2.91 (m,
1H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 4.32–4.49 (m, 1H), 5.13 (d,
J=6.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): l 19.4, 28.6, 34.3,
38.6, 49.8, 53.1, 80.9, 117.5, 155.9, 172.4, 172.8; HRMS:
m/z 314.1481 (calcd for C12H22N2O4: 314.1486).
5. Secrist, III, J. A.; Logue, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37,
335–336.
6. Reddy, P. A.; Hsiang, B. C. H.; Latifi, T. N.; Hill, M. W.;
Woodward, K. E.; Rothman, S. M.; Ferrendelli, J. A.;
Covey, D. F. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1898–1906.
7. Huang, S.-B.; Nelson, J. S.; Weller, D. D. Synth. Commun.
1989, 3485–3496.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for many helpful discussions through-
out the course of this work with Dr. Kim Albizati, Dr.
Ben Borer and Dr. David Kucera. We also thank Ms.
Laura Kuhn, Mr. Michael Mohajeri and Mr. Jason
Ewanicki for providing HPLC data.
References
8. Hamada, Y.; Shibata, M.; Sugiura, T.; Hato, S.; Shioiri, T.
J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52 (7), 1252–1255.
1. Dragovich, P. S.; Prins, T. J.; Zhou, R.; Webber, S. E.;