Page 5 of 9
Journal of the American Chemical Society
the electrophilic sulfhydryl group of azidothiol intermedi-
1
2
′
ate 3 and is also consistent with the high homophilicity of
sulfur. The calculated PES indicates that the second nucle-
ophilic attack is the rate-determining step with an overall
activation enthalpy of 16.2 kcal/mol, which is in good
agreement with the experimentally-measured H‡ of
13.8(5) kcal/mol. No significant difference in the relative
energies was observed when comparing the results be-
tween the DFT functionals and basis sets, highlighting the
robust energy landscape derived from these computation
studies. Although one would expect diffuse functions and
dispersion forces to play an important role in this trans-
formation, they have little impact on the thermochemistry
of this PES (Figure S8). Significant efforts to locate transi-
tion state structures corresponding to the 3- or 4-
membered transitions states required in Mechanism I
were unsuccessful.
[
][
]
푘
ArN H S
3
2
′
1
−
[
]
(
푘
rate = 푘3 HS
)
(3)
−
]
[
HS +푘
3
−1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
In the limiting case in which k3[HS–] << k’–1, which
would result at low sulfide concentrations or if the uni-
molecular disassociation of azidothiol intermediate 3 is
very fast, the rate law would condense to (4). However,
under the conditions in which k3[HS–] >> k’–1, which
would occur at higher [HS–] the rate law condenses to (5).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
′
푘
′
1
[
][ −][
]
rate = 푘 푘3 ArN3 HS H2S
(4)
(5)
−1
′
[
][
]
rate = 푘1 ArN3 H2S
Mechanistic Insights. The experimental and computa-
tional investigations outlined above provide a cohesive
mechanism for sulfide-mediated reduction of aryl azides. A
number of key points are highlighted below. First, the
mechanistic studies establish that HS–, rather than H2S, is
the active species responsible for sulfide-mediated azide
reduction. Because HS– is the dominant species under
physiological conditions, these results highlight that the
azide-reduction method reports on the most prevalent
form of available sulfide. Additionally, the initial addition
of HS– to the azide is reversible, suggesting that generation
of the important azidothiol intermediate may be difficult
under conditions in which sulfide concentrations are very
low. Additionally, it is possible that other sulfhydryl-
containing biomolecules, such as GSH, may participate in
the reaction after the initial attack by the more-
nucleophilic hydrosulfide anion. Furthermore, the mecha-
nistic insights suggest that protonation of the azidothiolate
intermediate is an important step for the reaction. One
would expect that addition of functional groups that could
make this intermediate more basic and favor protonation
would help to drive the reaction, thus facilitating nucleo-
philic attack in the subsequent and rate-limiting step. Ad-
ditionally, these mechanistic studies show that sulfide, and
likely one equivalent of thiol, are consumed during each
reduction of an aryl azide, highlighting that such sensing
methods perturb sulfide levels and the redox state of the
system. Based on the growing importance of the reduction-
labile sulfane sulfur pool, such reaction-based detection
methods may inadvertently disturb the distribution of sul-
fide between the bound and free pool, thus opening new
questions related to how H2S sensor impact redox homeo-
stasis. With the absence of reversible H2S sensing mecha-
nisms that operate under physiological conditions, such
perturbations remain a reality of reaction-based sensors,
and need to be considered for biological inquiries in which
irreversible, reaction-based reporters are used.
Under the experimental reaction conditions, we ob-
serve a 1st-order dependence in both [ArN3] and in [HS–],
which would be expected when [HS–] in in excess and is
consistent with (5). Our attempts to shift the reaction to
the other regime in which a 2nd-order dependence on sul-
fide is observed, including using C7-Az as the flooding sub-
strate, have maintained a 1st-order sulfide dependence,
suggesting that we are experimentally unable to access the
other limiting condition. However, when taken in combina-
tion with the reaction stoichiometry data and trapping of
–
the HS2 reaction product (vide supra), and DFT reaction
coordinate calculations (vide infra) these kinetic data sup-
port the proposed mechanisms for sulfide-mediate aryl
azide reduction.
DFT Calculations. To provide added insights into the
feasibility and energetics of the mechanism proposed in
Scheme 2, we also conducted a full conformational search
of each reactant, product, and intermediate and located
each transition state using Gaussian 09 at the B3LYP/6-
31G(d,p), B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p), M06/TZVP, and
M06/def2-TZVPD levels of theory applying the IEF-PCM
water and MeCN solvation models. The calculated poten-
tial energy surface (PES) for the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)
and M06/def2-TZVPD levels of theory with the water solv-
ation model is shown in Figure 6. Starting from C7-Az (1),
the transition state of the first nucleophilic attack TS12 was
located with a calculated energy barrier of 8.8 kcal/mol
and proceeds to generate anionic azidothiol intermediate
2, with an overall endothermicity of 4.1 kcal/mol. Attempts
to locate transition state structures derived from the attack
of HS– on anionic 2 were unsuccessful, whereas protona-
tion of 2 to form neutral azidothiol intermediate 3 pro-
ceeds with a modest enthalpic penalty of 3.0 kcal/mol.23
Subsequent nucleophilic attack by HS– on 3 proceeds
through transition state TS34, which has a local energy bar-
rier of 8.6 kcal/mol to generate the deprotonated amine
which is then protonated to generate the highly thermody-
namically-favored C7-NH2 product (-58.9 kcal/mol). This
second nucleophilic attack proceeds with the HS– attacking
ACS Paragon Plus Environment