Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
the syn/anti-configured stereotriade. At the outset we faced
massive reproducibility issues, which could ultimately be
traced back to the catalyst preparation. Gratifyingly, it was
found that samples of complex 11 prepared in a separate step
by condensation of diphenylprolinol and phenylboronic
cleavage of the TES-ether. Subsequent Sonogashira cou-
[39]
pling
of 15b with trimethylsilylacetylene followed by
selective cleavage of the CÀSi bond gave the 1,3-enyne 16
as required for the assembly of the “B-series”. Equally facile
was the elaboration of 15a into 17 by a copper-mediated
[33]
[30]
[40]
acid (rather than from PhBCl2) in a Dean–Stark trap
followed by activation of the resulting oxazaborolidine with
TfOH at low temperature led to good results, consistently
furnishing compound 7 in 69% yield (over two steps, dr=
coupling with lithiated trimethylsilylpropyne; importantly,
no trace of allene was observed in the crude mixture under
these conditions nor after desilylation with K CO /MeOH.
2
3
The skipped enyne 17 was deprotonated with nBuLi and
the resulting lithio-acetylide added to ketone 8 in the
[34,35]
8
9:11, C6-epimers, > 10 g scale).
With access to decagram quantities of this key building
presence of LaCl ·2LiCl to reduce the basicity of the reagent
3
[41,42]
block in only five operations, a solid basis was reached from
which the project could branch out toward the two different
product series. To this end, 7 was PMB-protected; only the
(Scheme 4).
Unsurprisingly perhaps, the remote stereo-
centers in 8 (drꢀ 90:10) had no significant impact on the
stereochemical course of the reaction. Because the two
[36]
[43]
quinolone ether 10 worked well, whereas more traditional
isomers were separable at this stage, no effort was made
[44]
methods gave complex mixtures. The subsequent Tsuji/
to impose better control over the addition process; rather,
we were pressing forward to check the feasibility of the
subsequent key steps en route to aldgamycin N (1) and its
cousins of the “A-series”. Whereas the selective deprotection
of the TES-ether of adduct 18 proceeded smoothly in acidic
medium under carefully controlled conditions without dam-
aging the acid-sensitive tertiary alcohol, all attempts to cleave
the methyl ester of 19 and release the seco-acid in readiness
for macrolactonization were met with poor yields or even
Wacker oxidation with catalytic PdCl , CuCl as co-catalyst,
2
and oxygen as the terminal oxidant furnished the required
[22]
methyl ketone 8 in high yield.
The necessary alkyne modules of type C and F could also
be accessed by a uniform strategy (Scheme 3). Thus, Sharpless
epoxidation of the homologous Z-alkenes 12a,b followed by
opening of the resulting oxirane derivatives 13a,b with
lithium acetylide ethylenediamine complex proved practi-
[37]
[45]
cal: although the attack of the nucleophile is not overly
regioselective, the undesired isomer—which is a 1,2- rather
than 1,3-diol—is readily discarded by an oxidative work-up
complete failure. Rather than opting for a re-launch of the
project with a more orthogonal ester, we explored the
possibility of forging the large ring by transesterification.
Gratifyingly, stannoxane 25a proved adequate in that it
allowed lactone 20 to be formed in 68% yield on a decent
[
37]
with NaIO4. After appropriate differential protection, the
terminal alkyne was subjected to hydrozirconation/iodina-
[
38]
[46]
tion; the procedure had to be modified in that 2,6-lutidine
was introduced prior to the addition of iodine to avoid
scale (> 400 mg, single largest batch). The isomeric addi-
tion product 8-epi-18 was processed analogously to the
corresponding epimeric lactone (see the SI); it was at this
stage that the configuration of the C8-stereocenter could be
tentatively assigned, which was later confirmed by the total
[
47]
synthesis of aldgamycin N. In the end, this transesterifica-
tion saved a step in the longest linear sequence as it rendered
the formation of the seco-acid obsolete. It is also notable that
this example seems to be only the second successful applica-
tion of this methodology to the synthesis of a macrolide
[48–51]
natural product.
With the macrocyclic frame closed, we faced the challenge
of transforming the propargylic entity of 20 into the acyloin
motif characteristic of aldgamycin N (1) by regioselective
hydration of the triple bond at the more hindered site. This
goal was reached by resorting to a method previously
[52]
developed in our laboratory, which was slightly modified
and further improved for this particular application. Specif-
ically, 20 was subjected to a ruthenium catalyzed trans-
hydrostannation, because this reaction faithfully delivers the
Scheme 3. a) Cumene hydroperoxide, Ti(OiPr) , L-diisopropyl tartrate,
4
CH Cl , À208C, 54% (13a, 92% ee), 73% (13b, 87% ee); b) (i)
2
2
[
2
HCꢁCLi]·eda, THF, 08C ! RT; (ii) NaIO , CH Cl /H O, 42% (14a),
4
2
2
2
-
SnBu moiety to the position proximal to the -OH substitu-
3
9% (14b, 97% ee after recrystallization); c) TBDPSCl, imidazole,
[53,54]
ent.
This regioselective outcome is rooted in a highly
CH Cl , 83% (R=H); d) TESOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH Cl , 08C ! RT, 96%
2
2
2
2
ordered transition state, in which the polarized [RuÀCl] unit
(
R=H), 91% (R=Me, over both steps); e) (i) Cp ZrCl , Dibal-H, THF,
2 2
0
8C ! RT; (ii) I , 2,6-lutidine, THF, À788C, 65% (15a), 74% (15b);
of the catalyst [Cp*RuCl] locks the substrate in place by
2
f) 15b, TMSCꢁCH, [(PPh ) PdCl ] (2.5 mol%), CuI, Et N; g) K CO ,
3
2
2
3
2
3
interligand hydrogen bonding; at the same time, the chloride
MeOH, THF, 96% (over two steps); h) TMSCꢁCMe, nBuLi, THF,
À788C, then 15a, CuI, DMAP, 08C ! RT; i) K CO , MeOH, THF, 84%
[54,55]
ligand steers the incoming stannane as shown in H.
As
2
3
expected, this directing effect was also operative in the
present case in that alkenylstannane 21 was formed in good
yield as a single regio- and stereoisomer. This compound was
then subjected to a Chan-Lam-type coupling: rather than
(
over two steps); Cp=cyclopentadienyl; Dibal-H=diisobutylaluminum
hydride; DMAP=4-dimethylamino-pyridine; eda=ethylene-
,2-diamine; TBDPS=tert-butyldiphenylsilyl; TES=triethylsilyl;
1
TMS=trimethylsilyl.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7893 – 7899
ꢀ 2021 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH www.angewandte.org
7895