20
W. Wu et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 219 (2014) 18–27
heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC), rotating-frame
overhauser effect spectroscopy (ROESY) and nuclear overhauser
effect spectroscopy (NOESY)) were recorded on a Bruker AV-500
(Bruker, Newark, Germany) using tetramethylsilane as the internal
standard. Chemical shifts were expressed in d (ppm) and coupling
constants (J) were reported in Hertz (Hz).
Afterwards, the stock solutions of the glucuronides at known
concentrations were diluted with DMSO to obtain working solu-
tions at serial concentrations. Two microliters of each working
solution were mixed with the in vitro reaction system, respectively,
and processed in the same manner as described in Section 2.3
before subjected to LC–MS/MS analysis. The calibration curves
were constructed by plotting the peak area ratios of the analyte
to the internal standard versus nominal concentrations of the
analyte. All glucuronides exhibited good linearity (R2 > 0.99)
within the concentration ranges tested (DG, 1.3–652 nM; AEG1,
1.9–972 nM; AEG2, 1.2–597 nM; EG3, 3.9–4020 nM; CG1, 1.4–
367 nM; CG2, 0.7–371 nM; PG1, 0.6–154 nM; PG2, 1.0–251 nM)
except for EG3, of which the calibration curve fitted a quadratic
equation with a regression coefficient higher than 0.99 within
3.9–4020 nM (data not shown).
2.6. Identification of the conjugation sites of the glucuronides of
physcion and chrysophanol
To determine the conjugation sites of the glucuronides of phys-
cion (PG1 and PG2), physcion-8-glucoside (P-8-G, 50 lM) was incu-
bated with 0.5 mg protein/mL RLMs in the presence of 1 mM
UDPGA for 2 h. The glucuronide of P-8-G (PGG) formed was isolated
using an analytical column (Alltech Alltima™ C18 column, 5 lm,
250 mm ꢁ 4.6 mm), and then hydrolyzed by incubating with HCl
(0.1 M) and ascorbic acid (5 mg/mL) at 60 °C for 15 min. The hydro-
lytic mixture containing P-8-G and physcion-1-O-glucuronide was
analyzed before and after spiking with the separated PG1 or PG2
using LC–MS/MS on the analytical column (Alltech Alltima™ C18
2.8. HPLC–MS/MS analysis
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on an ABI 4000 Q-
Trap™ hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) interfaced online with an HP
1200 series binary pump SL system. Data acquisition and processing
were conducted using Analyst (version 1.5.1, Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA). Analytes were eluted on an Agilent XDB C18 column
column, 5
l
m, 250 mm ꢁ 4.6 mm). The identities of PG1 and PG2
were assigned by comparing their retention times and mass spectra
with those of physcion-1-O-glucuronide in the mixture.
Chrysophanol-8-glucoside (C-8-G, 50 lM) was processed in the
(3.5
l
m, 100 mm ꢁ 2.1 mm). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1%
same manner as described above. Chrysophanol-1-O-glucuronide
formed in the mixture was used for determination of the conjuga-
tion sites of CG1 and CG2.
aqueous formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) and eluted in a gradient
mode: 0–5 min,10–30% B, 0.3 mL/min; 5–10 min, 30–60% B, 0.3 mL/
min; 10–12 min, 60–100% B, 0.4 mL/min, 12–13 min, 100–10%,
0.4 mL/min, re-equilibration 10% B, 0.3 mL/min, 13–18 min. Elec-
trospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis was operated in
negative ion mode under the following conditions: dry gas N2 8 L/
min, dry temperature 350 °C, nebulizer pressure 40 psi, capillary
voltage ꢂ3500 V. Structural identification was performed at a mass
range of m/z 100–700 for the glucuronides of C-8-G (CGG) and P-8-G
(PGG), and m/z 100–600 for all aglycones and their glucuronides.
Quantitative analysis was performed in multiple reaction
monitoring (MRM) mode. The aglycones and the respective
mono-glucuronides were monitored at the selected precursor/frag-
ment ion pairs: m/z 238.9/211.1 (danthron), 414.9/238.9 (DG),
268.9/239.1 (aloe-emodin), 444.9/268.9 (AEG1, AEG2), 283.1/
238.9 (rhein), 459.1/282.9 (RG1, RG2, RG3), 268.9/224.9 (emodin),
444.8/268.9 (EG1, EG2, EG3), 252.9/224.9 (chrysophanol), 428.9/
252.8 (CG1, CG2), 282.9/239.8 (physcion), 458.9/282.8 (PG1,
PG2). For all analytes, enhanced potential was ꢂ10 V with excep-
tion of ꢂ4.5 V for AEG1 and AEG2, collision cell potential was ꢂ5
to ꢂ10 V, declustering potential was ꢂ40 to ꢂ80 V and collision
energy was ꢂ21 to ꢂ45 V.
2.7. Construction of calibration curves of rhubarb anthraquinones and
their glucuronides
Calibration curves of anthraquinones (aglycones) were con-
structed using HPLC–UV analysis. Five microliters of stock solutions
of each anthraquinone at serial concentrations were added to 95
lL
of methanol, respectively, and 10 L of the solution were then sub-
l
jected to HPLC–UV analysis. The calibration curve of each aglycone
was obtained by plotting peak area measured at 268 nm versus
nominal concentrations of the analyte. Good linearity (r2 P 0.999)
was observed for each aglycone over tested concentration range
(emodin 250–1000 lM, other anthraquinones 50–500 lM).
Anthraquinone glucuronides generated in the in vitro incuba-
tion system were quantitatively determined with the metabolites
isolated (DG, AEG1, AEG2, EG3, CG1, CG2, PG1 and PG2), except
for rhein glucuronides which were semi-quantitated with mass
responses (RG1, RG2, RG3), using HPLC–MS/MS analysis. Each
anthraquinone glucuronide was dissolved in DMSO to make a stock
solution, respectively. Since the amounts of anthraquinone glucu-
ronides isolated from the in vitro study were too low to be weighed
accurately, the concentrations of the stock solutions were deter-
mined from the calibration curve of respective aglycone with a
UV conversion factor (K) between each aglycone and the respective
glucuronide at equal molar concentration. The K value was deter-
2.9. Data analysis
The glucuronidation activity of each anthraquinone was
calculated from the formations of all its mono-glucuronides with
exceptions of rhein and emodin. Glucuronidation of emodin was
approximately measured from the formation of the major glucuro-
nide EG3, which accounted for >95% of all three glucuronides
generated. The elimination of rhein was roughly estimated from
substrate loss due to minor formations and the unavailability of
the pure glucuronides. Data were presented as means standard
deviation (S.D) from triplicate reactions.
mined as follows: (1) 5
lL of stock solution of each glucuronide
was added to 95 L of the aqueous ascorbic acid (5 mg/mL) alone
l
or aqueous ascorbic acid (5 mg/mL) containing b-glucuronidase
(100 U/mL), respectively. The mixed solutions were incubated at
37 °C for 1 h before 100 lL of methanol was added to terminate
the reactions. After centrifugation, the supernatants were analyzed
by HPLC–UV at 268 nm. (2) The differences between the peak area
of the glucuronide (
cone ( Peak area A) in samples obtained before and after the
hydrolysis treatment were calculated. K value was the ratio of
Peak area A to Peak area G (K = Peak area A/ Peak area G).
DPeak area G) and that of the respective agly-
D
3. Results
D
D
D
D
3.1. Metabolism of anthraquinones in rat and human microsomes
The conversion factors (K) of DG, AEG1, AEG2, EG3, CG1, CG2,
PG1 and PG2 from their respective parent compounds were within
0.82–0.94.
When incubated with liver or intestinal microsomes from rats
or humans, all tested anthraquinones were metabolized to their